Repository navigation
Record five changed answers the breaking changes missed - #1914
Merged
Rafael-SOWNet merged 3 commits intoOct 16, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Measured on the 2.5.0 package and on master: pi and an exponential evaluated at a higher precision after a lower one (#1368), the parse cache across the downcasting setting (#1517), and a difference of a negated term in a solution and in LaTeX (#1397). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012sonx8iAspMiwRwokT1Ura
Measured: e^(-i x) cos(x) is NaN + C on 2.5.0, x/2 + e^(-2 i x)/(-4 i) on master. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012sonx8iAspMiwRwokT1Ura
Rafael-SOWNet
changed the title
Measured with the downcasting off: (1.98e119 + i)/(3.39e125 + i) is 0 on 2.5.0, 5.84e-7 on master. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012sonx8iAspMiwRwokT1Ura
Rafael-SOWNet
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Five changes to returned values since 2.5.0 that BREAKING-CHANGES.md did not record. Each was measured on the 2.5.0 package and on master (bc175c2) with the same probe:
MathS.pi.Evaledunder 300 digits, after a read under 100"e^(1/3)".Evaledthe same wayMathS.FromString("1/3").Evaledunder downcasting off, after the same parse with it on1/30.3333…"b - x = 0".Solve("x"){ -b / (-1) }{ b }"1/100 - (-4)*x".ToEntity().Latexize()\frac{1}{100}--4 \cdot x\frac{1}{100}+4 \cdot x"e^(-i*x)*cos(x)".Integrate("x")NaN + C1/2 x + 1/2 e^(-2i x)/(-2i)(1.98e119 + i)/(3.39e125 + i)with the downcasting off05.8407…e-7#1374 reproduces only with the downcasting off (exact, both versions give
33/56500000). One more suspect did not reproduce and gets no entry: #1611's printing of a complex number made with downcasting off, which is identical on both. The medium suspects in the release draft were probed the same way: #1377, #1312 and #1315 changed answers that their PRs' entries already cover in kind (the entries name other inputs from the same rules), #1371's entry covers the type change, and #1289's shape is declined on both. Documentation only.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_012sonx8iAspMiwRwokT1Ura