feat(quarto): dynamically set codeRunner.default_method based on avai…

[iamralch]

Detects presence of "iron.core" and "molten.health" modules at runtime and sets codeRunner.default_method accordingly in the quarto-nvim plugin options.

[github-actions]

Review Checklist

Does this PR follow the [Contribution Guidelines](development guidelines)? Following is a partial checklist:

Proper conventional commit scoping:

• If you are adding a new plugin, the scope would be the name of the category it is being added into. ex. feat(utility): added noice.nvim plugin

• If you are modifying a pre-existing plugin or pack, the scope would be the name of the plugin folder. ex. fix(noice-nvim): fix LSP handler error

• Pull request title has the appropriate conventional commit type and scope where the scope is the name of the pre-existing directory in the project as described above

• README is properly formatted and uses fenced in links with <url> unless they are inside a [title](url)

• Entry returns a single plugin spec with the new plugin as the only top level spec (not applicable for recipes or packs).

• Proper usage of opts table rather than setting things up with the config function.

• Proper usage of specs table for all specs that are not dependencies of a given plugin (not applicable for recipes or packs).

[azdanov]

Hey. What about slime? Although, I don't use this extension so no clue how it's supposed to work.

[iamralch]

@azdanov slime is the default option. Do you want me to set it explicitly?

[azdanov]

Nope, probably not needed if it's default. Just asking since I don't know anything about this plugin apart from reading docs.

Can there be a situation where a user has both iron and molten installed simultaneously?

[iamralch]

I haven't used them in one configuration. I suspect that they are compatible. The difference is that molten is handling jupyter notebooks vs iron is a repl for python and other languages.

[azdanov]

@Uzaaft Do you have any experience with these? I'm only certain of web dev stuff, this looks like data science.

[Uzaaft]

Not sure I like how one plugin is prioritized over the other, but the community will provide feedback.

Actually I think this is the wrong way to go around it.

[Uzaaft]

After a second lookover, I feel like this code smells too much.

[iamralch]

@Uzaaft @azdanov thank you for the feedback. I am closing the PR.