You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Commit 3e5cbae
Browse filesBrowse the repository at this point in the historyBrowse files
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+2-2Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ Use BOBE if:
11
11
-**Your likelihood function is expensive to evaluate (t~1s or more)**
12
12
-**You need Bayesian evidence estimates and/or posterior samples efficiently**
13
13
14
-
BOBE works best for problems with up to ~15-20 parameters, although this can vary based on the specific problem and likelihood structure.
15
-
It has been tested to work well upto 30 dimensions for simple multivariate Gaussian likelihoods and upto 16 dimensions for cosmological likelihoods (LCDM+ :math:`\Omega_k` with the Planck Camspec likelihood).
14
+
BOBE works best for problems with up to 15-20 parameters, although this can vary based on the specific problem and likelihood structure.
15
+
It has been tested to work well upto 30 dimensions for simple multivariate Gaussian likelihoods and upto 16 dimensions for cosmological likelihoods (LCDM + curvature) with the Planck Camspec likelihood).
16
16
BOBE may not be necessary if your likelihood already evaluates in milliseconds, as the overhead of training the GP surrogate and running Bayesian optimisation
17
17
may not be worth the speedup. For such cases, there is generally no need to go beyond standard MCMC/nested sampling tools.
0 commit comments