Chart later numeric report rows - #47
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR updates the HTML diagnostics report renderer to build compact bar charts from the first available numeric rows (skipping leading blank/non-numeric rows), rather than only considering the first 12 table rows. This improves report usefulness when early rows are missing values while later rows contain chartable diagnostics.
Changes:
- Update
_bar_chartto collect numeric rows across the full section and then chart the first 12 numeric entries. - Add a regression test ensuring a later numeric row still produces a chart even when the first 12 rows are non-numeric.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
python/fast_mlsirm/report.py |
Adjusts bar chart row selection to skip non-numeric rows and chart the first numeric diagnostics encountered. |
tests/test_report.py |
Adds regression coverage for leading blank chart values followed by a chartable row. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues. FindingsNo blocking findings. SummaryApproval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (9 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (9 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Workflow: cflite_pr.yml"]
S2 --> I2["GitHub Actions review job"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Workflow: cflite_pr.yml"]
R2 --> V2["actionlint plus required checks"]
Evidence --> S3["Test: test_report.py"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> R3["Review risk: Test: test_report.py"]
R3 --> V3["targeted test run"]
|
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
Approval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including python/fast_mlsirm/report.py, tests/test_report.py.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports supported repository test suites passed.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports configured repository docstring gates passed or docstring coverage was advisory.
DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed behavior map connects python/fast_mlsirm/report.py to the affected review, runtime, or workflow path and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, current-head workflow evidence, and, where numeric, scientific, statistical, or literature-backed claims are affected, original-paper/formula evidence and parameter-recovery expectations were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions, object naming, and reserved-word safety for schema/API/config/code surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, test, setup, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: connected user, operator, API, CLI, documentation, review-comment, status-check, rendering, and workflow-reader behavior was checked for contradictions against code, docs, and tests in bounded evidence.
Visual/DOM: Playwright visual, DOM locator, ARIA snapshot, console, and responsive evidence were checked when a web UI surface was present; for non-web surfaces, API/CLI/log/docs/workflow interaction evidence was reviewed instead.
Accessibility/i18n: accessibility, localization, and human-readable text surfaces were checked where UI, CLI, API message, docs, logs, or review text changed.
Supply-chain/license: dependency, package, model, container, and external-tool changes were checked in bounded evidence.
Packaging: package, build, test, lint, and security contracts were checked in bounded evidence.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: The changes correctly implement the intended behavior and include a regression test.
- Head SHA:
7cf8a6bcd192281caf75b59570d9e2ce54244338 - Workflow run: 28499800513
- Workflow attempt: 2
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: report.py"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: report.py"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Test: test_report.py"]
S2 --> I2["regression suite"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Test: test_report.py"]
R2 --> V2["targeted test run"]
|
Merge follow-up for the approved-but-not-merged state:
No source change needed in this loop; blocker was merge policy automation, not code/test/security failure. |
Pull request was closed
|
Required-workflow refresh done:
No source change was needed; this was an old-PR required-workflow freshness issue. |
|
Refreshing required workflow events again: the PR is approved and mergeable, but the current required workflow set is stuck on non-rerunnable CANCELLED central runs (gh run rerun returns workflow 404). Closing and reopening to emit fresh required-workflow events; no source change is intended. |
Pull request was closed
|
Second required-workflow refresh completed. Current blocker was not source code: PR head Actions taken:
No source change was made. |
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head7cf8a6bcd192281caf75b59570d9e2ce54244338. -
Head SHA:
7cf8a6bcd192281caf75b59570d9e2ce54244338 -
Workflow run: 29033297875
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Evidence
- Head SHA:
7cf8a6bcd192281caf75b59570d9e2ce54244338 - Required test evidence: supported repository test suites must pass.
- Required docstring evidence: repository-owned docstring gates must pass when configured; otherwise docstring coverage is advisory.
Python project dependencies (.)
Using CPython 3.12.3 interpreter at: /usr/bin/python3
Creating virtual environment at: .venv
Resolved 13 packages in 246ms
Building fast-mlsirm @ file:///home/runner/work/fast-mlsirm/fast-mlsirm/pr-head
Downloading pygments (1.2MiB)
Downloading numpy (15.9MiB)
Downloaded pygments
Downloaded numpy
Built fast-mlsirm @ file:///home/runner/work/fast-mlsirm/fast-mlsirm/pr-head
Prepared 7 packages in 923ms
Installed 7 packages in 18ms
+ fast-mlsirm==0.1.0 (from file:///home/runner/work/fast-mlsirm/fast-mlsirm/pr-head)
+ iniconfig==2.3.0
+ numpy==2.5.1
+ packaging==26.2
+ pluggy==1.6.0
+ pygments==2.20.0
+ pytest==9.1.1
- Result: PASS
Python coverage with missing-line report (.)
Installed 6 packages in 9ms
============================= test session starts ==============================
platform linux -- Python 3.12.3, pytest-9.1.1, pluggy-1.6.0
rootdir: /home/runner/work/fast-mlsirm/fast-mlsirm/pr-head
configfile: pyproject.toml
collected 75 items
tests/test_cli.py ............... [ 20%]
tests/test_config.py .................. [ 44%]
tests/test_diagnostics.py ............. [ 61%]
tests/test_fit_pipeline.py .. [ 64%]
tests/test_io.py .. [ 66%]
tests/test_math.py ....... [ 76%]
tests/test_objective.py ...... [ 84%]
tests/test_report.py .......... [ 97%]
tests/test_simulation.py .. [100%]
============================== 75 passed in 1.17s ==============================
Installed 1 package in 3ms
Name Stmts Miss Cover Missing
-----------------------------------------------------------------
python/fast_mlsirm/__init__.py 7 0 100%
python/fast_mlsirm/cli.py 227 47 79% 57, 59, 224-232, 260-268, 306-314, 344-345, 349-351, 378-386, 408-410, 454
python/fast_mlsirm/config.py 78 0 100%
python/fast_mlsirm/diagnostics.py 320 19 94% 44, 185, 313, 403, 624, 626, 632, 638, 652, 669, 671, 676, 678, 689, 694, 697, 701, 704, 708
python/fast_mlsirm/fit.py 176 0 100%
python/fast_mlsirm/io.py 50 0 100%
python/fast_mlsirm/math.py 32 0 100%
python/fast_mlsirm/objective.py 109 0 100%
python/fast_mlsirm/report.py 188 14 93% 21, 87, 135, 137, 245, 247, 278, 291, 327, 350, 356, 363, 372, 377
python/fast_mlsirm/simulation.py 29 0 100%
python/fast_mlsirm/types.py 57 0 100%
tests/test_cli.py 148 0 100%
tests/test_config.py 57 0 100%
tests/test_diagnostics.py 86 0 100%
tests/test_fit_pipeline.py 16 0 100%
tests/test_io.py 16 0 100%
tests/test_math.py 63 0 100%
tests/test_objective.py 66 0 100%
tests/test_report.py 112 0 100%
tests/test_simulation.py 18 0 100%
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 1855 80 96%
- Result: PASS
Python docstring coverage advisory
RESULT: FAILED (minimum: 80.0%, actual: 1.4%)
- Result: PASS
Rust coverage tooling (cargo-llvm-cov)
Updating crates.io index
Downloading crates ...
Downloaded cargo-llvm-cov v0.8.7
Installing cargo-llvm-cov v0.8.7
Updating crates.io index
Updating crates.io index
Downloading crates ...
Downloaded autocfg v1.5.0
Downloaded anyhow v1.0.102
Downloaded bitflags v2.11.1
Downloaded shared_child v1.1.1
Downloaded xattr v1.6.1
Downloaded cfg-if v1.0.4
Downloaded shared_thread v0.2.0
Downloaded shell-escape v0.1.5
Downloaded serde_spanned v1.1.1
Downloaded same-file v1.0.6
Downloaded os_pipe v1.2.3
Downloaded opener v0.8.4
Downloaded termcolor v1.4.1
Downloaded zmij v1.0.21
Downloaded lcov2cobertura v1.0.9
Downloaded glob v0.3.3
Downloaded errno v0.3.14
Downloaded itoa v1.0.18
Downloaded fs-err v3.3.0
Downloaded toml_parser v1.1.2+spec-1.1.0
Downloaded rustc-demangle v0.1.27
Downloaded lexopt v0.3.2
Downloaded walkdir v2.5.0
Downloaded toml v1.1.2+spec-1.1.0
Downloaded unicode-ident v1.0.24
Downloaded tar v0.4.45
Downloaded memchr v2.8.0
Downloaded serde v1.0.228
Downloaded ruzstd v0.8.3
Downloaded serde_json v1.0.149
Downloaded regex v1.12.3
Downloaded winnow v1.0.2
Downloaded cargo-config2 v0.1.44
Downloaded quick-xml v0.39.4
Downloaded aho-corasick v1.1.4
Downloaded serde_core v1.0.228
Downloaded quote v1.0.45
Downloaded duct v1.1.1
Downloaded syn v2.0.117
Downloaded bstr v1.12.1
Downloaded camino v1.2.2
Downloaded serde_derive v1.0.228
Downloaded regex-syntax v0.8.10
Downloaded rustix v1.1.4
Downloaded proc-macro2 v1.0.106
Downloaded toml_datetime v1.1.1+spec-1.1.0
Downloaded filetime v0.2.29
Downloaded regex-automata v0.4.14
Downloaded libc v0.2.186
Downloaded linux-raw-sys v0.12.1
Compiling serde_core v1.0.228
Compiling memchr v2.8.0
Compiling libc v0.2.186
Compiling proc-macro2 v1.0.106
Compiling aho-corasick v1.1.4
Compiling unicode-ident v1.0.24
Compiling regex-syntax v0.8.10
Compiling quote v1.0.45
Compiling rustix v1.1.4
Compiling winnow v1.0.2
Compiling serde v1.0.228
Compiling zmij v1.0.21
Compiling anyhow v1.0.102
Compiling autocfg v1.5.0
Compiling regex-automata v0.4.14
Compiling linux-raw-sys v0.12.1
Compiling bitflags v2.11.1
Compiling fs-err v3.3.0
Compiling serde_spanned v1.1.1
Compiling toml_datetime v1.1.1+spec-1.1.0
Compiling toml_parser v1.1.2+spec-1.1.0
Compiling syn v2.0.117
Compiling cfg-if v1.0.4
Compiling camino v1.2.2
Compiling serde_json v1.0.149
Compiling filetime v0.2.29
Compiling xattr v1.6.1
Compiling regex v1.12.3
Compiling bstr v1.12.1
Compiling toml v1.1.2+spec-1.1.0
Compiling serde_derive v1.0.228
Compiling shared_child v1.1.1
Compiling os_pipe v1.2.3
Compiling quick-xml v0.39.4
Compiling itoa v1.0.18
Compiling shared_thread v0.2.0
Compiling same-file v1.0.6
Compiling rustc-demangle v0.1.27
Compiling lcov2cobertura v1.0.9
Compiling walkdir v2.5.0
Compiling cargo-config2 v0.1.44
Compiling duct v1.1.1
Compiling opener v0.8.4
Compiling tar v0.4.45
Compiling termcolor v1.4.1
Compiling shell-escape v0.1.5
Compiling ruzstd v0.8.3
Compiling lexopt v0.3.2
Compiling glob v0.3.3
Compiling cargo-llvm-cov v0.8.7
Finished `release` profile [optimized] target(s) in 1m 03s
Installing /home/runner/.cargo/bin/cargo-llvm-cov
Installed package `cargo-llvm-cov v0.8.7` (executable `cargo-llvm-cov`)
- Result: PASS
Rust coverage with missing-line report
info: cargo-llvm-cov currently setting cfg(coverage); you can opt-out it by passing --no-cfg-coverage
info: running `rustup component add llvm-tools-preview --toolchain stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` to install the `llvm-tools-preview` component for the selected toolchain
info: downloading component llvm-tools
Compiling mlsirm-core v0.1.0 (/home/runner/work/fast-mlsirm/fast-mlsirm/pr-head/crates/mlsirm-core)
Finished `test` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.99s
Running unittests src/lib.rs (target/llvm-cov-target/debug/deps/mlsirm_core-dad37cea16f0abb2)
running 2 tests
test tests::gradient_matches_finite_difference_for_tau ... ok
test tests::single_item_matches_manual_nll ... ok
test result: ok. 2 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s
Filename Regions Missed Regions Cover Functions Missed Functions Executed Lines Missed Lines Cover Branches Missed Branches Cover
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/home/runner/work/fast-mlsirm/fast-mlsirm/pr-head/crates/mlsirm-core/src/lib.rs 267 15 94.38% 11 1 90.91% 184 5 97.28% 0 0 -
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 267 15 94.38% 11 1 90.91% 184 5 97.28% 0 0 -
Uncovered Lines:
/home/runner/work/fast-mlsirm/fast-mlsirm/pr-head/crates/mlsirm-core/src/lib.rs: 78, 99, 129, 160
- Result: FAIL (exit 1)
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: report.py"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: report.py"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Test: test_report.py"]
S2 --> I2["regression suite"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Test: test_report.py"]
R2 --> V2["targeted test run"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current headaac355f0f9eb29633a492ed1dbb57f9bf0bdaa7c. -
Head SHA:
aac355f0f9eb29633a492ed1dbb57f9bf0bdaa7c -
Workflow run: 29074434518
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (10 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Workflow (3 files)"]
S2 --> I2["GitHub Actions review job"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["actionlint plus required checks"]
Evidence --> S3["Test: test_report.py"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["targeted test run"]
# Conflicts: # .github/dependabot.yml # .github/workflows/ci.yml # .github/workflows/codeql.yml # SECURITY.md # crates/mlsirm-core/src/lib.rs
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
Approval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including .clusterfuzzlite/Dockerfile, .clusterfuzzlite/build.sh, .clusterfuzzlite/project.yaml, .github/dependabot.yml, .github/workflows/cflite_pr.yml, and 6 more.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports supported repository test suites passed.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports configured repository docstring gates passed or docstring coverage was advisory.
DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed behavior map connects .clusterfuzzlite/Dockerfile to the affected review, runtime, or workflow path and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, current-head workflow evidence, and, where numeric, scientific, statistical, or literature-backed claims are affected, original-paper/formula evidence and parameter-recovery expectations were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions, object naming, and reserved-word safety for schema/API/config/code surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, test, setup, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: connected user, operator, API, CLI, documentation, review-comment, status-check, rendering, and workflow-reader behavior was checked for contradictions against code, docs, and tests in bounded evidence.
Visual/DOM: Playwright visual, DOM locator, ARIA snapshot, console, and responsive evidence were checked when a web UI surface was present; for non-web surfaces, API/CLI/log/docs/workflow interaction evidence was reviewed instead.
Accessibility/i18n: accessibility, localization, and human-readable text surfaces were checked where UI, CLI, API message, docs, logs, or review text changed.
Supply-chain/license: dependency, package, model, container, and external-tool changes were checked in bounded evidence.
Packaging: package, build, test, lint, and security contracts were checked in bounded evidence.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: All tests pass, no blocking issues, and changes improve report functionality.
- Head SHA:
e31f5101e0b0d5c882744868e9809667486a8d81 - Workflow run: 29076448669
- Workflow attempt: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (9 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (9 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Workflow: cflite_pr.yml"]
S2 --> I2["GitHub Actions review job"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Workflow: cflite_pr.yml"]
R2 --> V2["actionlint plus required checks"]
Evidence --> S3["Test: test_report.py"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> R3["Review risk: Test: test_report.py"]
R3 --> V3["targeted test run"]
Dismissed stale coverage-evidence request on old head; current head e31f510 has passing checks, resolved threads, no open code-scanning alerts, and current-head OpenCode approval.
Summary
Verification
py -3.12 -m pytest tests/test_report.py::test_render_table_section_charts_later_numeric_rows -q-> 1 passedpy -3.12 -m pytest tests/test_report.py -q-> 10 passedpy -3.12 -m pytest-> 75 passedgit diff --check-> no whitespace errorsDesign Notes
token_invalidated, so this PR uses the generated HTML report as the visual surface.