Skip to content

SSR: avoid sending new response when headers were already sent - #4733

Merged
tdonohue merged 1 commit into
DSpace:mainfrom
danielcoelhocgu:fix-2315
Sep 30, 2025
Merged

SSR: avoid sending new response when headers were already sent#4733
tdonohue merged 1 commit into
DSpace:mainfrom
danielcoelhocgu:fix-2315

Conversation

@danielcoelhocgu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

References

Fixes #2315

Description

This PR solves a problem that resulted in the following warning message in logs:

Warning [ERR_HTTP_HEADERS_SENT]: Tried to set headers after they were sent to the client Error: Cannot set headers after they are sent to the client

This seems to happen when frontend redirects a request. For example when accessing a permanent URI (/handle/XXX/YYY). Although redirect works in most cases, in our particular infrastructure on AWS it causes an error message to be displayed to the user.

Instructions for Reviewers

I added a check in SSR main render function in order to avoid sending more content when HTTP headers were already sent in the same request.

To test it, make sure SSR is active and access a collection or item page using a permanent URI. Verify the logs to see if the warning message is present or not.

Checklist

This checklist provides a reminder of what we are going to look for when reviewing your PR. You do not need to complete this checklist prior creating your PR (draft PRs are always welcome).
However, reviewers may request that you complete any actions in this list if you have not done so. If you are unsure about an item in the checklist, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help!

  • My PR is created against the main branch of code (unless it is a backport or is fixing an issue specific to an older branch).
  • My PR is small in size (e.g. less than 1,000 lines of code, not including comments & specs/tests), or I have provided reasons as to why that's not possible.
  • My PR passes ESLint validation using npm run lint
  • My PR doesn't introduce circular dependencies (verified via npm run check-circ-deps)
  • My PR includes TypeDoc comments for all new (or modified) public methods and classes. It also includes TypeDoc for large or complex private methods.
  • My PR passes all specs/tests and includes new/updated specs or tests based on the Code Testing Guide.
  • My PR aligns with Accessibility guidelines if it makes changes to the user interface.
  • My PR uses i18n (internationalization) keys instead of hardcoded English text, to allow for translations.
  • My PR includes details on how to test it. I've provided clear instructions to reviewers on how to successfully test this fix or feature.
  • If my PR includes new libraries/dependencies (in package.json), I've made sure their licenses align with the DSpace BSD License based on the Licensing of Contributions documentation.
  • If my PR includes new features or configurations, I've provided basic technical documentation in the PR itself.
  • If my PR fixes an issue ticket, I've linked them together.

@tdonohue tdonohue added bug high priority 1 APPROVAL pull request only requires a single approval to merge labels Sep 22, 2025
@tdonohue tdonohue moved this to 🙋 Needs Reviewers Assigned in DSpace 10.0 Release Sep 22, 2025
@tdonohue tdonohue added port to dspace-7_x port to dspace-8_x This PR needs to be ported to `dspace-8_x` branch for next bug-fix release port to dspace-9_x This PR needs to be ported to `dspace-9_x` branch for next bug-fix release labels Sep 22, 2025
@tdonohue tdonohue moved this from 🙋 Needs Reviewers Assigned to 👍 Reviewer Approved in DSpace 10.0 Release Sep 22, 2025

@tdonohue tdonohue left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Thanks @danielcoelhocgu ! I see this small fix has had a lot of positive feedback in #2315. I gave it a try myself as well, and it seems to reduce the number of warnings (with no obvious side effects). I'll merge this immediately and attempt to auto-backport to 7.x, 8.x and 9.x

@tdonohue tdonohue added this to the 10.0 milestone Sep 30, 2025
@tdonohue
tdonohue merged commit eef6d95 into DSpace:main Sep 30, 2025
15 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from 👍 Reviewer Approved to ✅ Done in DSpace 10.0 Release Sep 30, 2025
@dspace-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport failed for dspace-7_x, because it was unable to cherry-pick the commit(s).

Please cherry-pick the changes locally and resolve any conflicts.

git fetch origin dspace-7_x
git worktree add -d .worktree/backport-4733-to-dspace-7_x origin/dspace-7_x
cd .worktree/backport-4733-to-dspace-7_x
git switch --create backport-4733-to-dspace-7_x
git cherry-pick -x 951c5f69d46db57efb5423c4581b4c895793c6dd

@dspace-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Successfully created backport PR for dspace-8_x:

@dspace-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Successfully created backport PR for dspace-9_x:

@tdonohue

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

UPDATE: This could not be automatically backported to 7.6.x, as the code in server.ts is quite different in that release. Therefore, it will require a volunteer to create a manual backport PR against the dspace-7_x branch.

However, this has been backported automatically to 8.x and 9.x and will be fixed in the next maintenance releases for those versions.

@tdonohue tdonohue removed port to dspace-8_x This PR needs to be ported to `dspace-8_x` branch for next bug-fix release port to dspace-9_x This PR needs to be ported to `dspace-9_x` branch for next bug-fix release labels Sep 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

1 APPROVAL pull request only requires a single approval to merge bug high priority

Projects

No open projects
Status: ✅ Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Warning [ERR_HTTP_HEADERS_SENT]: Tried to set headers after they were sent to the client

3 participants