Skip to content

docs(cliffs): shipping orientation is 2.4%, not 2.0% (#84) - #89

Closed
wormeyman wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/cliff-accuracy-figure
Closed

docs(cliffs): shipping orientation is 2.4%, not 2.0% (#84)#89
wormeyman wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/cliff-accuracy-figure

Conversation

@wormeyman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The banner kept the pre-#88 figure. Since the collision box was corrected to rotbb's rotated rectangle, the rejection costs zero true positives, so the shipping matched set is identical to the unfiltered one: 1531 either way, 37 wrong orientations, 2.42%. Measured on both paths.

Docs only.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01WRKSNgkidxc6daeHGJHqpt

The banner kept the pre-#88 figure. Since the collision box was corrected to
rotbb's rotated rectangle the rejection costs ZERO true positives, so the
shipping matched set is identical to the unfiltered one - 1531 either way, 37
wrong orientations, 2.42%. Measured on both paths.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WRKSNgkidxc6daeHGJHqpt
@wormeyman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Superseded: the figure this was correcting has moved again. Disassembly showed the collision box model in #88 was wrong, so the shipping numbers are now recall 0.9720 / precision 0.9713. Folded into the follow-up PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant