docs: distinguish Windows review evidence from hosted Ubuntu CI

Signed-off-by: HiTecHelpLLC <167040707+HiTecHelpLLC@users.noreply.github.com>

Author: HiTecHelpLLC

README.md

@@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
 
 A deliberately small, reviewed collection of local creation workflows. Quality
 and clear scope matter more than the number of entries. This initial library
-contains **one MIT-licensed workflow**, qualified against our own browser fixture.
+contains **one MIT-licensed workflow**, with local signed qualification evidence
+for our synthetic browser fixture on Windows 11.
 It does not contain a scraped collection of third-party scripts.
 
 The engine lives in [L1ght5p33d](https://github.com/HiTecHelpLLC/l1ght5p33d).
@@ -99,10 +100,14 @@ Live application claims additionally require evidence from the specified app and
 version. Existing examples in the engine repository are candidates, not implicit
 members of this curated collection.
 
-The initial CI targets Windows and Ubuntu with Python 3.12. Browser installation
-and CI dependency installation require network access; routine workflow execution
-does not require an AI connection. Metadata describe the test scope, not universal
-compatibility. There is no public workflow registry deployment in this repository.
+The initial CI targets GitHub-hosted Windows and Ubuntu runners with Python 3.12.
+Ubuntu CI results are neither local WSL evidence nor native Linux desktop
+qualification, and they do not expand the Windows 11 scope of the signed evidence.
+WSL GUI support is not claimed. Native Windows input and live BandLab qualification
+remain pending. Browser installation and CI dependency installation require
+network access; routine workflow execution does not require an AI connection.
+Metadata describe the test scope, not universal compatibility. There is no public
+workflow registry deployment in this repository.
 
 Unofficial and unaffiliated with BandLab, Suno, browser vendors, and other
 applications. Product names identify potential integrations only.

SIGNING.md

@@ -6,14 +6,20 @@ These are three separate claims:
    It is not a THEBEST test endorsement. Authors keep their own keys.
 2. A **THEBEST curator signature** binds a workflow version, its complete review
    metadata, test evidence, source runtime commit, environment and qualified scope.
-   This library's initial attestation covers only our synthetic browser fixture.
+   This library's initial attestation covers only our synthetic browser fixture
+   run locally on Windows 11.
 3. **Your run approval** confirms the complete proposed actions, effective inputs,
    application and permissions on your machine. Neither kind of signature grants it.
 
 The initial entry has a THEBEST curator attestation. No separate upstream author
 signature is claimed. Test claims are evidence signed by the curator, not a
 cryptographic proof that a test was run or a promise that every environment is safe.
 
+GitHub-hosted Ubuntu CI results are separate from this signed Windows 11 evidence.
+They are neither local WSL evidence nor native Linux desktop qualification. WSL
+GUI support is not claimed; native Windows input and live BandLab qualification
+remain pending.
+
 ## Verify an exact version
 
 Install `requirements-verify.txt`. Obtain THEBEST's public key through a channel