@@ -214,14 +214,13 @@ one — the actual research contribution, or the place the approach stalls.
214214 * value-identified* product-formula theorem, because it reduces to unique
215215 factorization + the existing congruence certificate (exact only because the value
216216 is identified).
217- - ** Plausibly formalizable, classical (📊 confirmed, was "the prize/stall"):** ** M4b** —
218- the finite-precision gauge bound over * live* prefixes (§3.3). The scratch probe
219- settled it: the deviation is ` Θ(1/q_n²) ` with effective ` C = 1 ` (Hurwitz), so M4b is
220- * reachable* — but it reduces to the classical CF convergent bound (the non-Arch legs
221- are exact constants), so it is ** mechanical** Lean labor, not research. Formalization
222- handle: the FDRS ` bracket_invariant ` (` |det| = 1 ` ) gives `|p_n/q_n − p_ {n-1}/q_ {n-1}|
223- = 1/(q_n q_ {n-1})` , chained to the convergent bound; ` steps_qCur_unbounded` gives
224- ` q_n → ∞ ` ; the non-Arch factor is the exact product-formula constant ` 1/|x| ` .
217+ - ** BUILT ✅ (was "the prize/stall", now machine-checked):** ** M4b** — the finite-precision
218+ gauge bound ` | |p_n/q_n|·P − 1 | ≤ P/q_n ` (` GaugeBound.lean ` : ` gauge_bound ` , +
219+ ` gauge_product_tendsto ` for ` Π_n → 1 ` ). The scratch probe settled the shape (` Θ(1/q_n²) ` ,
220+ ` C = 1 ` , Hurwitz); the Lean proof assembles Mathlib's ` abs_sub_convs_le ` (whose own proof
221+ goes through ` fib(n+2) ≤ denom ` — the gauge growth, FDRS's ` steps_qCur_unbounded ` /
222+ ` bracket_invariant ` in Mathlib form) + the product-formula constant ` P ` . It ** is** the
223+ classical CF convergent bound in adelic costume — mechanical assembly, not new math.
225224- ** Genuinely open / may not work:** any * additive* coupling law (§3.2 boundary); the
226225 full restricted-product (L3) version.
227226- ** The failure mode that did NOT occur:** the worry was that the gauge bound might have
0 commit comments