You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We ran the longest pre-training for SFT-8 but the unfortunately more did not mean better in this case - eval results were pretty bad, see https://tju01.github.io/ilm-eval/
The idea to add red_pajama was to continue training basic language modelling. It was also used in the 2nd stage with the hope to reduce overfitting, but the effect was not clear and the end-result was "mediocre".
A new 2-stage training without red-pajama, stack-exchange & the prosocial datasets is currently running (now with LoRA).
Just for reference, the old SFT-8 stage-1 dataset config was (bad, don't use):
Thanks for your reply. Moreover, is there a good fraction of pretrain data in the sft training stage? Now i used 15% pretrain data and 85% instruction tuning data in the sft training. Is there any suggesiton about the fraction between these two part of data?
Activity
andreaskoepf commentedon Jun 7, 2023
We ran the longest pre-training for SFT-8 but the unfortunately more did not mean better in this case - eval results were pretty bad, see https://tju01.github.io/ilm-eval/
The idea to add red_pajama was to continue training basic language modelling. It was also used in the 2nd stage with the hope to reduce overfitting, but the effect was not clear and the end-result was "mediocre".
A new 2-stage training without red-pajama, stack-exchange & the prosocial datasets is currently running (now with LoRA).
Just for reference, the old SFT-8 stage-1 dataset config was (bad, don't use):
fengyh3 commentedon Jun 8, 2023
Thanks for your reply. Moreover, is there a good fraction of pretrain data in the sft training stage? Now i used 15% pretrain data and 85% instruction tuning data in the sft training. Is there any suggesiton about the fraction between these two part of data?