Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

3 Commits

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Turkish Hair Transplant Clinic Data

An open dataset of hair transplant clinics in Turkey, verified against primary sources — including every clinic we checked and did not list, with the reason and the date.

Free to use, commercially or otherwise, under CC BY 4.0. Credit Compare Hair Transplant with a link.

  • data/clinics.json — every clinic in the directory, with two facts the industry does not publish about itself: whether the clinic names the surgeon who operates, and whether it puts a price in writing.
  • data/rejected.json — every clinic we checked and did not list, with what we observed, the date we observed it, and the page we read.
  • SCHEMA.md — every field, what it means, and how it was checked.
  • Live figures: https://comparehairtransplant.com/data

Why the rejections are the interesting half

Every hair transplant directory publishes who it included. None publish who they left out. That makes the inclusions impossible to audit — you cannot tell a curated list from a list of whoever paid, because the only difference between the two is the part nobody shows you.

So this dataset ships both halves. If our standards are bad, this file is what you need to say so.

Snapshot

Current counts live inside each file under counts, so they can never disagree with the rows they describe. At the time of the last export:

  • 44 businesses checked
  • 36 clinics listed, plus 2 booking agencies labelled as agencies
  • 32 of 36 clinics name a physician on their own website
  • 7 of 36 clinics publish a price in writing; every other figure is labelled as our estimate
  • 8 businesses checked and not listed

Read this before you use it

surgeon.state has four values and they are not interchangeable.

  • named — the clinic names a physician on its own website.
  • checked_names_nobody — we read the clinic's own website on the date in checked_on and it named no physician. That is an observation on a date, not a claim about who operates.
  • not_checkedwe have not looked, or the site refused automated access. We make no claim in either direction.
  • agency_does_not_operate — a booking agency, which by its own description does not perform procedures.

not_checked must never be republished or aggregated as though it meant a clinic hides something. It means we do not know. Collapsing "we don't know" into "they won't say" turns a gap in our research into an accusation against a business, and that is the one way this dataset can do real harm. Anything built on it should keep the four states apart.

The same discipline applies to rejected.json: every reason is a dated observation of a public page, never a verdict about a business. Two of the four reason codes carry no criticism at all — duplicate_domain and unverifiable are bookkeeping about our own data.

These records have a shelf life. A clinic that named no physician in July may name one next year. checked_on is inside every record for exactly that reason; a record read without its date is being read wrongly.

Nothing here is an assessment of clinical quality or safety, and nothing here is medical advice.

How the data was collected

  • The clinic's own website is the source for who operates and what it costs. Not a directory, not a review site, not a listing that quotes them. If the clinic did not say it, we did not record it.
  • Accreditation claims are checked against the issuing body where one is reachable. A badge on a clinic's own page is a claim, not a certificate.
  • A failed page load is not evidence. Several clinics block automated fetching; a human opened each one in a browser instead. We never record "names nobody" on the strength of a 403.
  • Ratings and review counts are deliberately absent. We hold no review volume we can source, and an unsourced star rating inside a dataset about provenance would be a joke at our own expense.
  • Full method, including what it deliberately leaves out: https://comparehairtransplant.com/how-we-rank

Corrections and appeals

Named a surgeon since we checked? Started publishing prices? Tell us and we will re-check.

That is not a courtesy line. A published negative claim obliges us to keep it current, and a clinic that has changed is the correction we most want to make. Same goes for anything you think we got wrong.

We also re-check every domain in rejected.json quarterly and publish the result whichever way it goes. A domain that now names a surgeon gets its date bumped and moves into the directory or out of the file.

Updates

The files are regenerated from the live database whenever clinic records change. Output is deterministic — sorted rows, no generation timestamp — so a re-run with no data change produces no diff, and the one line that did change is the one you see in git log. Per-record dates are the authority on freshness; this repo's commit history is the changelog.

How to cite

Compare Hair Transplant, Turkish Hair Transplant Clinic Data, CC BY 4.0. https://comparehairtransplant.com/data

For a page or an article, a link to https://comparehairtransplant.com satisfies the attribution requirement.

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Use it, sell it, build on it, remix it. Credit Compare Hair Transplant with a link to https://comparehairtransplant.com, and say if you changed anything. That is the entire deal.

About

Open dataset of Turkish hair transplant clinics, verified against primary sources — including every clinic we checked and did not list, with the reason and the date. CC BY 4.0.

Topics

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors