This catalog is a museum, not an active-only registry. An
abandoned 2018 project is just as valid a catalog entry as a
live 2026 one — the longitudinal record is the value. This row
hasn't been classified yet: the ask is to fill in its
decay_cause, NOT to remove the row.
Row id: github-copilot-custom-instructions--gh-copilot-customizing-copilot
Name: GitHub Copilot custom instructions
Repo: https://github.com/copilot/customizing-copilot
Last commit: unknown
Days since last commit: 1460
Severity: abandoned (per MAINTAINER.md §2 freshness SLA)
Detection signal: repo-not-found (404 from GitHub API)
Opened automatically by the weekly staleness check
(.github/workflows/staleness.yml, issue #38). The detection
windows are stale = 12-24 months quiet, abandoned = 24+
months quiet. That signal is mechanical — it tells us the row
went quiet, not why. The decay_cause field (see
docs/SCHEMA.md §3c) is where the why lives.
Pick a decay-cause
One of the eight enum values:
acquired — bought by another vendor.
pivoted — team moved to a different product.
unfunded — funding ran out, no acquisition.
lost-benchmark-race — outpaced by a better system in the same niche.
superseded — academic paper replaced by a follow-up paper by the same / overlapping authors.
research-complete — academic paper with no maintained codebase intended (one-shot research artefact).
archived — GitHub repo has archived: true set.
unknown — researched but no clear cause found.
Evidence
Provide a URL (resolvable http(s):// — TechCrunch / Crunchbase
/ founder blog post / GitHub repo / S2 follow-up paper / etc.)
or an [unverifiable] <free-text> string describing what
you searched. Example:
[unverifiable] researched: techcrunch, vbeat, hn algolia, wayback; no clear cause found.
Applying the classification
- Open
data/landscape.json and find the record with
id == "github-copilot-custom-instructions--gh-copilot-customizing-copilot".
- Set the three record-level fields:
decay_cause — one of the eight values above.
decay_date — ISO YYYY-MM-DD (best estimate of when
the project went quiet; the last-commit date is a fine
default if you don't have something better).
decay_evidence — URL or [unverifiable] … string.
- Run
make build to refresh edges + re-render landscape.html.
- Run
make validate to confirm the row passes gate 5
(decay-field enum + format checks).
- Commit (
data/landscape.json + landscape.html) and close
this issue.
The row stays in the catalog regardless of decay-cause — we
want the historical entry. Auto-reopen is not implemented; if
upstream resumes activity, this issue stays open until a
maintainer closes it manually.
Generated by scripts/check_staleness.py on 2026-08-25T12:10:19Z.
This catalog is a museum, not an active-only registry. An
abandoned 2018 project is just as valid a catalog entry as a
live 2026 one — the longitudinal record is the value. This row
hasn't been classified yet: the ask is to fill in its
decay_cause, NOT to remove the row.Row id:
github-copilot-custom-instructions--gh-copilot-customizing-copilotName: GitHub Copilot custom instructions
Repo: https://github.com/copilot/customizing-copilot
Last commit: unknown
Days since last commit: 1460
Severity: abandoned (per MAINTAINER.md §2 freshness SLA)
Detection signal: repo-not-found (404 from GitHub API)
Opened automatically by the weekly staleness check
(
.github/workflows/staleness.yml, issue #38). The detectionwindows are
stale= 12-24 months quiet,abandoned= 24+months quiet. That signal is mechanical — it tells us the row
went quiet, not why. The
decay_causefield (seedocs/SCHEMA.md§3c) is where the why lives.Pick a decay-cause
One of the eight enum values:
acquired— bought by another vendor.pivoted— team moved to a different product.unfunded— funding ran out, no acquisition.lost-benchmark-race— outpaced by a better system in the same niche.superseded— academic paper replaced by a follow-up paper by the same / overlapping authors.research-complete— academic paper with no maintained codebase intended (one-shot research artefact).archived— GitHub repo hasarchived: trueset.unknown— researched but no clear cause found.Evidence
Provide a URL (resolvable
http(s)://— TechCrunch / Crunchbase/ founder blog post / GitHub repo / S2 follow-up paper / etc.)
or an
[unverifiable] <free-text>string describing whatyou searched. Example:
[unverifiable] researched: techcrunch, vbeat, hn algolia, wayback; no clear cause found.Applying the classification
data/landscape.jsonand find the record withid == "github-copilot-custom-instructions--gh-copilot-customizing-copilot".decay_cause— one of the eight values above.decay_date— ISOYYYY-MM-DD(best estimate of whenthe project went quiet; the last-commit date is a fine
default if you don't have something better).
decay_evidence— URL or[unverifiable] …string.make buildto refresh edges + re-renderlandscape.html.make validateto confirm the row passes gate 5(decay-field enum + format checks).
data/landscape.json+landscape.html) and closethis issue.
The row stays in the catalog regardless of decay-cause — we
want the historical entry. Auto-reopen is not implemented; if
upstream resumes activity, this issue stays open until a
maintainer closes it manually.
Generated by
scripts/check_staleness.pyon 2026-08-25T12:10:19Z.