🛡️ Sentinel: Assessed codebase and found no valid security vulnerabilities to fix.

[NoWon1]

🚨 Severity: N/A
💡 Vulnerability: N/A - Checked for bare except blocks and random module usage. Standard random usage is required for reproducibility in scientific simulations and try_except blocks are fine as long as they aren't bare excepts.
🎯 Impact: N/A
🔧 Fix: N/A - No PR created, process stopped as per constraints to avoid security theater.
✅ Verification: Ran pytest and bandit to ensure no actual regressions or issues existed.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 7850002573819276354 started by @NoWon1

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[Copilot]

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.

---

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.