Skip to content

[19.0][IMP] auth_saml: optional split error page - #924

Open
vincent-hatakeyama wants to merge 1 commit into
OCA:19.0from
xcgd:feature/19.0/auth_saml/optional-split-error-page
Open

vincent-hatakeyama wants to merge 1 commit into
OCA:19.0from
xcgd:feature/19.0/auth_saml/optional-split-error-page

Conversation

@vincent-hatakeyama

@vincent-hatakeyama vincent-hatakeyama commented Apr 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Goes after #916

Forward port of #898

@vincent-hatakeyama vincent-hatakeyama changed the title [19.0][IMP] auth saml: optional split error page [19.0][IMP] auth_saml: optional split error page Apr 2, 2026
@vincent-hatakeyama
vincent-hatakeyama force-pushed the feature/19.0/auth_saml/optional-split-error-page branch 2 times, most recently from 7ff2891 to 1b417c8 Compare April 16, 2026 07:43
@vincent-hatakeyama
vincent-hatakeyama force-pushed the feature/19.0/auth_saml/optional-split-error-page branch from 1b417c8 to df822f1 Compare May 4, 2026 11:46

@vvrossem vvrossem left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To depend on #916 without adding the commits, add in a separate commit (e.g. [DO NOT MERGE] test-requirements.txt) test-requirements.txt with

odoo-addon-auth_saml @ git+https://github.com/OCA/server-auth.git@refs/pull/916/head#subdirectory=auth_saml

@vincent-hatakeyama
vincent-hatakeyama force-pushed the feature/19.0/auth_saml/optional-split-error-page branch from df822f1 to 10490de Compare June 18, 2026 11:19
@vincent-hatakeyama
vincent-hatakeyama force-pushed the feature/19.0/auth_saml/optional-split-error-page branch from 10490de to 8c88f36 Compare September 21, 2026 12:12
@vincent-hatakeyama
vincent-hatakeyama force-pushed the feature/19.0/auth_saml/optional-split-error-page branch from 8c88f36 to c42d7fb Compare September 21, 2026 12:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants