docs: fix unreachable case-insensitive confidence claim

[JarbasAl]

🤖 Auto-generated by Claude Sonnet 5 (claude-sonnet-5) via Claude Code — NOT human-reviewed. Verify before acting.

The README confidence table claimed a case-insensitive match scores -0.05. I built the package in a throwaway venv (2.3.1a1, editable install) and ran the exact quick-start example plus targeted probes for each table row.

• Confirmed: exact/cased match with registered entity value returns conf 1.0.
• Confirmed: entity value not in samples returns conf 0.90.
• Confirmed: unregistered entity returns conf 0.96.
• Confirmed: wildcard penalty falls in the stated -0.05 to -0.25 range.
• Refuted: a case-differing query (pattern "Hello There", query "hello there") returns conf 1.0, not 0.95. Reading padacioso/init.py shows _normalize lowercases both training samples and queries via ovos_spec_tools.normalize_for_match before any matching happens, so query_has_upper inside _match is always False when called through calc_intent/calc_intents, and the case-insensitive penalty branch is unreachable through the public API.

I removed the row and added a short note explaining why the case-insensitive penalty path does not fire in practice.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

• Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

Another day, another set of automated checks. Let's see! 🌅

I've aggregated the results of the automated checks for this PR below.

📋 Repo Health

Giving the repo a clean bill of health! 🛁

✅ All required files present.

Latest Version: 2.3.1a1

✅ padacioso/version.py — Version file
✅ README.md — README
✅ LICENSE.md — License file (consider renaming to LICENSE)
✅ pyproject.toml — pyproject.toml
⚠️ setup.py — setup.py
✅ CHANGELOG.md — Changelog
✅ padacioso/version.py has valid version block markers

🔒 Security (pip-audit)

Checking for any insecure data transmissions. 📡

✅ No known vulnerabilities found (49 packages scanned).

⚖️ License Check

Scanning for any non-commercial-only restrictions. 💰

✅ No license violations found.

Policy: Apache 2.0 (universal donor). StrongCopyleft / NetworkCopyleft / WeakCopyleft / Other / Error categories fail. MPL allowed.

📊 Coverage

Testing the resilience of our codebase. 🧱

✅ 80.4% total coverage

Per-file coverage (3 files)

File	Coverage	Missing lines
padacioso/version.py	0.0%	5
padacioso/opm.py	80.8%	78
padacioso/__init__.py	81.0%	63

Full report: download the coverage-report artifact.

🔍 Lint

I've gathered the facts for your review. 📖

❌ ruff: issues found — see job log

🔌 Plugin Detection

Ensuring the plugin is 'future-proof'. 🔮

❌ Plugin Status: ERRORS (1)

Plugin Info:

• Name: padacioso
• Description: dead simple intent parser

OPM Detection:

Plugin Type	Wheel	Editable
pipeline	✅	✅

Entry Point Validation:

Entry Point	Type	Import	Interface
ovos-padacioso-pipeline-plugin	pipeline	✅ 898ms	⊘

⊘ No settingsmeta.json
✅ requires-python >=3.8 — running Python 3.11

Issues:

• ❌ Import time for ovos-padacioso-pipeline-plugin exceeds 500ms (898ms)
• ⚠️ No settingsmeta.json found
• ⚠️ No settingsmeta.json found

🔨 Build Tests

Build test complete! Let's see if everything fits together. 🧩

✅ All versions pass

Python	Build	Install	Tests
3.10	✅	✅	✅
3.11	✅	✅	✅
3.12	✅	✅	✅
3.13	✅	✅	✅
3.14	✅	✅	✅

---

Processing... Done! Have a productive day! ☕