You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Commit df3af5f
Browse filesBrowse the repository at this point in the historyBrowse files
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/plan.md
+8-7Lines changed: 8 additions & 7 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -80,6 +80,14 @@ I'm terrible at SKILL.md, so I'm not at a place where I can easily automate this
80
80
81
81
## Directions to go
82
82
83
+
**Violates Known Physics false positive:** After switching from "Gemini-2.0-flash" to "Gemini-2.5-flash", I have noticed the "Violates Known Physics" gets triggered way too often, for reasons not related to physics. See the "Self Audit" section here, embarrasing:
Does the project require a major, unpredictable discovery in fundamental science to succeed?
87
+
Level: 🛑 High
88
+
Justification: Rated HIGH because the plan is entirely focused on non-physics constraints (governance, finance, regulation, logistics). The scenario involves no claims of perpetual motion, FTL travel, or violation of laws like thermodynamics or relativity. Mitigation is required for checklist completion based on scope instructions.
89
+
Mitigation: Governance Architect: Review the plan against fundamental conservation laws (Mass/Energy) to confirm no implicit physics rule violation exists by Q2 2025.
90
+
83
91
**Boost initial prompt:** The `initial prompt` has the biggest impact on the generated plan, if it's bad then the final plan is bad.
84
92
If it's well written, concise, there is a higher chance for a realistic/feasible plan.
85
93
I'm pondering about making a chat interface talking with planexe MCP interface, that assists the user in writing a plan.
@@ -267,10 +275,3 @@ I'm considering having a table of content in the left sidebar, similar to this:
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: worker_plan/worker_plan_internal/self_audit/self_audit.py
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -9,10 +9,10 @@
9
9
10
10
Value: It serves as a prioritized "fix-it" list. It tells the project manager which fires are the biggest. They don't need to worry about the team size (a ⚠️ Medium risk) if the entire project is a 🛑 High "Legal Minefield." It focuses their attention on the foundational, existential threats to the project's success.
11
11
12
-
13
12
The "violates known physics" detection is often gets triggered, freaking out about "faster than light travel" on documents that have nothing to do with FTL.
14
13
The "elephant-alpha" model especially struggle with detecting that, when it otherwise does an ok job at everything else.
15
14
I'm considering making a dedicated system prompt only for VIOLATES_KNOWN_PHYSICS, that is have lower rate of false positives.
15
+
After switching from "Gemini-2.0-flash" to "Gemini-2.5-flash", the "Violates Known Physics" gets fired nearly always.
16
16
17
17
Adding a new checklist item:
18
18
Find fabricated evidence. Where things aren't true.
0 commit comments