test(tensilelite): Add gfx1250_hw_xfail marker

[archana-ramalingam]

JIRA ID : AIHPBLAS-4510

Motivation

• A few gfx1250 common configs fail on the gfx1250 HW test runner.
• On the per-PR gfx1250 HW test workflow (ci(gfx1250): Add public gfx1250 hipblaslt + tensilelite HW CI workflow #12164) these will now be xfailed
• The nightly must keep reporting them as real failures.

Technical Details

• Add new gfx1250_hw_xfail marker
• Yamls marked xfail only when GFX1250_HW_XFAIL is set AND running on gfx1250 HW
• Active on per-PR workflow but inert on nightly

Test Plan

• Unit tests in test_config_helpers.py: env-set→strict xfail, no-env→inert, other-arch→inert.

Test Result

• pytest Tensile/Tests/common/test_config_helpers.py → 7 passed.

Submission Checklist

• Look over the contributing guidelines at https://github.com/ROCm/TheRock/blob/main/GOVERNANCE.md#pull-requests.

Risk level

• Low — additive and env-gated; inert unless GFX1250_HW_XFAIL is set, so no change to FFM, unit, or nightly pipelines.

[therock-pr-bot]

✅ All Checks Passed — Ready for Review

Check	Status	Details
📝 PR Description	✅ Pass	—
⛔ Forbidden Files	✅ Pass	—
🧪 Unit Test	✅ Pass	—
🔎 pre-commit	✅ Pass	—
🚫 Draft PR	🔜 To Be Enabled	—
🚩 Feature Flag	🔜 To Be Enabled	—
📊 Code Coverage	🔜 To Be Enabled	—
🤖 therock-pr-bot	✅ Pass	—

🎉 All checks passed! This PR is ready for review.

📖 Need help? See the Policy FAQ for details on every check and how to fix failures.

🙋 Wish to Override Policy?

[therock-pr-bot]

🎉 All checks passed! This PR is ready for review.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #12178   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    70.29%   70.29%           
========================================
  Files         2812     2812           
  Lines       462769   462769           
  Branches     68122    68122           
========================================
  Hits        325271   325271           
  Misses      113943   113943           
  Partials     23555    23555           

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
TensileLite-CPP	46.40% <ø> (ø)
TensileLite-Unit	76.10% <ø> (ø)
hipBLAS	90.62% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 4e41ad0
hipBLASLt	35.24% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 4e41ad0
hipCUB	82.68% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 4e41ad0
hipDNN	87.01% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 4e41ad0
hipFFT	43.07% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 4e41ad0
hipRAND	76.12% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 4e41ad0
hipSOLVER	68.92% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 4e41ad0
hipSPARSE	86.99% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 4e41ad0
rocBLAS	48.31% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 4e41ad0
rocFFT	47.88% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 4e41ad0
rocRAND	57.42% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 4e41ad0
rocSOLVER	76.83% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 4e41ad0
rocSPARSE	74.61% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 4e41ad0
rocThrust	91.60% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 4e41ad0

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[talumbau]

overall this looks reasonable, but we just want simple 'xfail' on the tests that are still failing right now (no env variable checking). I spoke with Dhiraj - the nightly email infra will have to handle output of the form 'XFAILED' instead of just 'FAILED'. So we want one consistent handing of the tests between CI and nightly.