Skip to content

Commit 8b12021

Browse files
authored
Add files via upload
1 parent c328562 commit 8b12021

1 file changed

Lines changed: 76 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

Lines changed: 76 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
1+
# ASTERION FCTA-1 V0.5 — ANSYS Workbench Structural Analysis Guide
2+
3+
## Purpose
4+
5+
This guide converts the V0.3 BEAM188 primary-structure model and V0.4 subsystem mass state into a controlled V0.5 structural-analysis project. The supplied project contains no claimed solved ANSYS database. Results must be generated and reviewed on the user's licensed ANSYS installation.
6+
7+
## Recommended project systems
8+
9+
Create one Engineering Data cell and connect it to:
10+
11+
1. Static Structural — docking compression.
12+
2. Static Structural — electric-propulsion thrust.
13+
3. Static Structural — twin-ring centrifugal loading.
14+
4. Static Structural — ring emergency braking.
15+
5. Static Structural — misaligned docking.
16+
6. Modal — free-free flight model.
17+
7. Modal — aft-supported ground-test model.
18+
8. Eigenvalue Buckling — linked from docking static pre-stress.
19+
20+
Duplicate systems for mesh and joint-stiffness sensitivity instead of overwriting evidence.
21+
22+
## Units and material
23+
24+
Use mm, N, s and tonne consistently in APDL imports. The preliminary material is aluminium 7075-T6 with E = 71,700 MPa, ν = 0.33, density = 2.81×10⁻⁹ tonne/mm³ and room-temperature yield screening strength = 503 MPa. Replace this with temperature- and product-form-specific allowables before making design claims.
25+
26+
## Global line model
27+
28+
Import or execute `analysis/ansys/v0_3/apdl/asterion_line_model.inc`. Confirm:
29+
30+
- 222 structural nodes;
31+
- 580 BEAM188 elements;
32+
- seven tube section families;
33+
- no zero-length or duplicate elements;
34+
- beam orientation is consistent; and
35+
- section assignment matches `beam_sections.csv`.
36+
37+
## Non-structural masses
38+
39+
Use `analysis/ansys/v0_4/model/remote_mass_definitions.csv` as the mass ledger. Prefer Mechanical Remote Mass objects connected to reviewed attachment frames. The included MASS21 macro is a seed only; uncoupled mass nodes are invalid.
40+
41+
For the rotating habitation sectors, place mass at the ring nodes and include centrifugal acceleration. For modal analysis, include suitable rotary inertia estimates once the subsystem geometry is available.
42+
43+
## Supports
44+
45+
The aft-fixed support is a ground-test/screening boundary condition. It is not a realistic flight condition. For flight static studies, use a minimum 3-2-1 stabilisation scheme or inertia relief and confirm reactions do not dominate the reported load path.
46+
47+
## Required result objects
48+
49+
For every static case request:
50+
51+
- total deformation;
52+
- directional deformation X/Y/Z;
53+
- equivalent stress;
54+
- beam axial force;
55+
- beam bending moment and torsion;
56+
- reaction forces and moments;
57+
- interface loads; and
58+
- factor-of-safety user result.
59+
60+
For modal studies request at least 16 modes, participation factors and effective mass. For free-free analysis, the first six modes must be rigid-body modes near zero frequency.
61+
62+
## Mesh convergence
63+
64+
Run B1, B2 and B3 from `mesh_convergence_plan.csv`. Compare a physically meaningful displacement, member force, first ten flexible frequencies and non-singular stress. A converged contour picture alone is not sufficient.
65+
66+
## Buckling
67+
68+
Link Eigenvalue Buckling to LC-STR-01 pre-stress. Inspect mode shapes and reject local numerical artefacts. A positive eigenvalue above the criterion does not prove stability; follow with geometric nonlinearity and seeded imperfections in V0.8.
69+
70+
## Evidence capture
71+
72+
Complete the CSV templates in `results_templates/`. Save screenshots showing model tree, mesh statistics, boundary conditions, solver messages, deformation scale, legends and probe locations. Record the exact ANSYS release and project checksum.
73+
74+
## Student-computer strategy
75+
76+
Keep the global model as beams. Use shells only for ring hubs and docking frames, then solids only as local submodels. Do not solve the complete spacecraft as a detailed solid mesh.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)