Add autogen for AMDC article in control with AMDC folder

[Daehoon-Sung]

This is to close #143 to close #149 to close https://github.com/Severson-Group/AMDC-Examples/issues/6.

Notes

This comment might be useful to refer to how we came up with the plan for those two ariticles.

Self-Review

In this section, please self-review (answer all questions) on a suitable review checklist prior to requesting review from others. Select a review checklist based on what content is being merged in; see the Review Checklists section.

Reviewer Instructions

Reviewers, please copy and paste a suitable review checklist into your review and answer all questions.

Appendix

This section should be the same for all PRs. Do not edit this section when creating a PR.

Review Checklists

Checklists maintained by the eLev lab for research repositories include:

• Report checklist
• Publication archive checklist (select a checklist from the Approach that corresponds to the step this PR seeks to complete).
• Standard checklist (if none of the above apply).

Standard checklist

1. Are all files under 300 kB (if not, please carefully assess whether it is worth committing them)? **Yes or No**
2. Are all files named according to the appropriate [naming convention](https://github.com/Severson-Group/research-repo-template?tab=readme-ov-file#file-naming), i.e., dash-case, camelCase, snake case? **Yes or No**
3. Do all Markdown files follow the [CONTRIBUTING article template](https://github.com/Severson-Group/.github/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#markdown-documentation-template)? **Yes or No**
4. Do all links work in the material that the PR is adding? **Yes or No**
5. Is the PR configured to close the correct issue(s)? **Yes or No**
6. Did the PR fully address the `Approach` section of the issue(s) it is closing? **Yes or No**

Please work on addressing any **No** items.

[mhmokhtarabadi]

This PR looks good to me now. @noguchi-takahiro, could you review this PR?

1. Are all files under 300 kB (if not, please carefully assess whether it is worth committing them)? Yes
2. Are all files named according to the appropriate naming convention, i.e., dash-case, camelCase, snake case? Yes
3. Do all Markdown files follow the CONTRIBUTING article template? No contributing articles
4. Do all links work in the material that the PR is adding? Yes
5. Is the PR configured to close the correct issue(s)? Yes
6. Did the PR fully address the Approach section of the issue(s) it is closing? Yes

[noguchi-takahiro]

Thank you @AwesomeTornado and @mhmokhtarabadi on making dark mode images.

@AwesomeTornado I have a one question here. When I make a rendered page looking like website, I usually do make html command. When I do this, it seems like all of version of 1.1 - 1.4 were compiled, but how can I find the current version in the feature/add-autogen-control-with-AMDC-article and render it?

[AwesomeTornado]

@noguchi-takahiro Try running make clean and then make local

[noguchi-takahiro]

Thank you @Daehoon-Sung @mhmokhtarabadi @AwesomeTornado. Looks good to me.

This PR looks good to me now. @noguchi-takahiro, could you review this PR?

1. Are all files under 300 kB (if not, please carefully assess whether it is worth committing them)? Yes
2. Are all files named according to the appropriate naming convention, i.e., dash-case, camelCase, snake case? Yes
3. Do all Markdown files follow the CONTRIBUTING article template? No contributing articles
4. Do all links work in the material that the PR is adding? Yes
5. Is the PR configured to close the correct issue(s)? Yes
6. Did the PR fully address the Approach section of the issue(s) it is closing? Yes

@elsevers could you review this PR?

[elsevers]

Great, thanks @Daehoon-Sung and @noguchi-takahiro! This is getting close.

I have noted several feedback items inline below. A couple more things:

1. Let's revise to use standard Mathworks terminology. The word "Autogen" is treated throughout both the article and tutorial as if that is a common, well known word. However, it is not --> for example, Google "matlab simulink autogen c code -- there is not a MATLAB page declaring "autogen" as a thing. I think it can be okay to use the term "Autogen," but it needs to be properly introduced.
2. I like that we have links to various Mathworks supporting articles. However, we are missing a link (or a set of links) towards the start of the article to Mathworks explanation of autogenerating c code and their recommended best practices. We should tell readers that this article (and the tutorial) are our recommendation on how to translate those best practices to use in the AMDC environment.

[noguchi-takahiro]

@elsevers I have addressed your feedback. Can you review this PR?

[noguchi-takahiro]

@elsevers this PR is ready for you.

[elsevers]

Thanks @noguchi-takahiro! I took a quick look and noted a couple more things -- listed inline below.

[noguchi-takahiro]

@elsevers I addressed your feedback and this is ready for review again.