Repository navigation
Test ruling-diff action across all ruling projects - #6429
romainbrenguier wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
6ddedf2 to
2e54558
Compare
Ruling Diff SummaryDetected changes in 8 rule files: 8 issues removed, 8 issues added. S103 (
|
|
⚖️ Ruling update ready for review: #6431 |
❌ ErrorsYour PR has failed checks. Please review the issues below and take necessary action before merging. 🚦 4 Pipeline jobs failed
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎 This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.🔗 Commit SHA: 47a8da3 | Docs | View more details | Give us feedback! |
|
⚖️ Ruling update ready for review: #6431 |
CI failed: Ruling QA jobs fail because expected ruling snapshots were deleted in this PR, so generated results (e.g. 52,108 issue differences for sonarqube-6.5) have no baseline to match; one additional job's failure is only partly visible in the logs.OverviewTwo unique failure patterns were found across 8 analyzed logs (3 templates). The clearest failure is FailuresMissing expected ruling baseline for sonarqube-6.5 (confidence: high)
Ruling comparison against outdated expected snapshots (confidence: medium)
Summary
Code Review ✅ Approved 1 closed / 1 findings🟡 Medium risk · Deleting 187 SonarQube 6.5 ruling fixtures and changing CI action pins could reduce regression coverage or alter PR-diff reporting. Test PR that moves one expected issue five lines up across the 11 ruling expectation files and pins the ruling-diff-comment action to a new commit. The previously flagged missing-source placeholders for nested submodules were resolved, and no open issues remain. ✅ 1 closed✅ Cross-PR: Pinned action shows missing-source placeholders for nested submodules
Verification Rules 3/3 met PRs 4 inspectedFunctional validation No results Rules 3 passed
Broader impact PRs 4 inspectedCross-PR 4 PRs inspected 0 open impacts
Auto-approval Not enabledFor more verification details, comment Tip Comment OptionsAuto-apply is off → Gitar will not commit updates to this branch. Comment with these commands to change the behavior for this request:
Was this helpful? React with 👍 / 👎 | Gitar |
|
|
⚖️ Ruling update ready for review: #6431 |
|
This PR is stale because it has been open 7 days with no activity. If there is no activity in the next 7 days it will be closed automatically |





Purpose
Draft test PR for the ruling-diff feature; not intended for merge.
Changes
3273aad355fb3463f1405a58a88d2f8b2b76ab3bfrom RC-353 Simplify ruling snippets to use checked-out sources core-languages-tooling-public#87.Validation
git diff --checkpassed.Expected result
The ruling-diff workflow posts a PR comment showing the intentional expectation changes across all ruling projects.