New eslint rule to prefer object shorthand - #2963
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughESLint configuration enables the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes The changes follow a single, repetitive pattern (object-shorthand syntax conversion) applied consistently across all files. While the volume spans 20+ files, the homogeneous nature of edits and absence of new logic or functional changes minimizes cognitive overhead per file. Each file requires verification that the refactor preserves method/property semantics without introducing unexpected Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
DeepSource reviewed changes in the commit range For detailed review results, please see the PR on DeepSource ↗ Important Some issues found as part of this review are outside of the diff in this pull request and aren't shown in the inline review comments due to GitHub's API limitations. Please see the DeepSource dashboard for this PR to view those issues. PR Report CardCode Review Summary
How are these analyzer statuses calculated?Administrators can configure which issue categories are reported and cause analysis to be marked as failed when detected. This helps prevent bad and insecure code from being introduced in the codebase. If you're an administrator, you can modify this in the repository's settings. |
…ject_shorthand New eslint rule to prefer object shorthand
Summary by CodeRabbit
Chores
Style