@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ I audited the statements against Mathlib v4.28.0
1616source and the citations against the primary literature. AUDIT.md records the Mathlib
1717survey, the errors corrected, and the claims that remain unverified.
1818
19- ## The slice
19+ ## The Slice
2020
2121Fix a finite field ` 𝔽_q ` of characteristic ` p ` ; a function field ` K ` over ` 𝔽_q `
2222with algebraic closure ` K̄ ` and absolute Galois group ` G_K = Gal(K̄/K) ` , carrying
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ At `λ₀` one may take `M = E_{λ₀}` and `ρ = ρ₀`, so `ρ₀` is itself o
9191companions. No clause asserting this is needed or stated, since once the
9292coefficient field varies an equality ` ρ_{λ₀} = ρ₀ ` is type-inappropriate.
9393
94- ## What is proved
94+ ## What is Proved
9595
9696` charpoly_eq_of_isConj_gl ` and ` charpoly_eq_of_isConj ` : the characteristic
9797polynomial of ` ρ(g) ` depends only on the conjugacy class of ` g ` . This is not the
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ obstructs defining arithmetic Frobenius at the infinite level, since
119119` IsArithFrobAt ` is stated for monoid actions and needs no finiteness. Existence
120120of Frobenius elements is a separate matter, treated under Limitations.
121121
122- ## Absolute irreducibility without algebraic closures
122+ ## Absolute Irreducibility Without Algebraic Closures
123123
124124Both the hypothesis on ` ρ₀ ` and the conclusion about the companion need absolute
125125irreducibility. Formalising that naively means constructing an algebraic closure
@@ -191,9 +191,9 @@ The slice is stated via `G_K` with an unramified-outside-`S` condition rather
191191than via ` π₁^ét(X ∖ S) ` , because no ` π₁^ét(X) ` is available in Mathlib v4.28.0.
192192AUDIT.md records what the library has here and what is missing.
193193
194- ## Why the unramifiedness hypothesis is not redundant
194+ ## A note on the Unramifiedness Hypothesis
195195
196- It is tempting to drop it. Continuity forces the image into a compact subgroup of
196+ It is tempting to drop it but continuity forces the image into a compact subgroup of
197197` GL_n(E_λ) ` , which stabilises a lattice, so the representation modulo each power
198198of the maximal ideal factors through a finite extension ramified at finitely many
199199places. That gives a finite ramification set at every finite level, but the
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ theorems additionally `sorryAx`), and counts the source lines
242242consisting of ` sorry ` , requiring exactly one. AUDIT.md records what each check establishes and what it
243243misses.
244244
245- ## Next steps
245+ ## Next Steps
246246
247247The most self-contained is existence of Frobenius elements in the absolute Galois
248248group, which is missing from Mathlib. Beyond
0 commit comments