Skip to content

Commit d64acc1

Browse files
committed
stylistic change of headers
1 parent 60b75d9 commit d64acc1

1 file changed

Lines changed: 6 additions & 6 deletions

File tree

README.md

Lines changed: 6 additions & 6 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ I audited the statements against Mathlib v4.28.0
1616
source and the citations against the primary literature. AUDIT.md records the Mathlib
1717
survey, the errors corrected, and the claims that remain unverified.
1818

19-
## The slice
19+
## The Slice
2020

2121
Fix a finite field `𝔽_q` of characteristic `p`; a function field `K` over `𝔽_q`
2222
with algebraic closure `` and absolute Galois group `G_K = Gal(K̄/K)`, carrying
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ At `λ₀` one may take `M = E_{λ₀}` and `ρ = ρ₀`, so `ρ₀` is itself o
9191
companions. No clause asserting this is needed or stated, since once the
9292
coefficient field varies an equality `ρ_{λ₀} = ρ₀` is type-inappropriate.
9393

94-
## What is proved
94+
## What is Proved
9595

9696
`charpoly_eq_of_isConj_gl` and `charpoly_eq_of_isConj`: the characteristic
9797
polynomial of `ρ(g)` depends only on the conjugacy class of `g`. This is not the
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ obstructs defining arithmetic Frobenius at the infinite level, since
119119
`IsArithFrobAt` is stated for monoid actions and needs no finiteness. Existence
120120
of Frobenius elements is a separate matter, treated under Limitations.
121121

122-
## Absolute irreducibility without algebraic closures
122+
## Absolute Irreducibility Without Algebraic Closures
123123

124124
Both the hypothesis on `ρ₀` and the conclusion about the companion need absolute
125125
irreducibility. Formalising that naively means constructing an algebraic closure
@@ -191,9 +191,9 @@ The slice is stated via `G_K` with an unramified-outside-`S` condition rather
191191
than via `π₁^ét(X ∖ S)`, because no `π₁^ét(X)` is available in Mathlib v4.28.0.
192192
AUDIT.md records what the library has here and what is missing.
193193

194-
## Why the unramifiedness hypothesis is not redundant
194+
## A note on the Unramifiedness Hypothesis
195195

196-
It is tempting to drop it. Continuity forces the image into a compact subgroup of
196+
It is tempting to drop it but continuity forces the image into a compact subgroup of
197197
`GL_n(E_λ)`, which stabilises a lattice, so the representation modulo each power
198198
of the maximal ideal factors through a finite extension ramified at finitely many
199199
places. That gives a finite ramification set at every finite level, but the
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ theorems additionally `sorryAx`), and counts the source lines
242242
consisting of `sorry`, requiring exactly one. AUDIT.md records what each check establishes and what it
243243
misses.
244244

245-
## Next steps
245+
## Next Steps
246246

247247
The most self-contained is existence of Frobenius elements in the absolute Galois
248248
group, which is missing from Mathlib. Beyond

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)