Skip to content

Implement feedback collection preferences for elimination rounds - #2903

Open
TrudeauOkech wants to merge 4 commits into
TabbycatDebate:developfrom
TrudeauOkech:elimination-feedback
Open

Implement feedback collection preferences for elimination rounds#2903
TrudeauOkech wants to merge 4 commits into
TabbycatDebate:developfrom
TrudeauOkech:elimination-feedback

Conversation

@TrudeauOkech

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd think the feedback expectations would remain the same between rounds; why are we copying the feedback paths and not a pref like "Expect team feedback for these rounds" with options for prelim only or prelims + elims ?

How should this work for silent rounds?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've dropped feedback paths and replaced with two scope preferences (Expect feedback from adjudicators in and Expect feedback from teams in, each prelims only / prelims + elims, defaulting to prelims only).

For silent rounds, matching prelims today (teams are never expected to give feedback in a silent round in either stage, while adjudicators still are).

What do you think? Does this work better?

Resets the elimination feedback work; it is reimplemented on top as a
round-scope preference per review on TabbycatDebate#2903.
Replaces the duplicated elimination-round feedback path preferences with
two scope preferences that control which rounds feedback is expected in.
The feedback paths and team feedback options keep their existing meaning
across both stages.
Covers the feedback form choices, the bulk get_feedback_progress path,
and stage-dependent orallist enforcement.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants