Add Groundtruth to Science & Research - #2315
Open
aniketshaw748-hub wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds one bullet to
docs/science--research.md, in the format from Add or Improve an Entry.Groundtruth lets an agent ask real humans a question mid-task and get verbatim answers back — for the questions the web genuinely cannot answer: fresh reactions to unpublished work, current on-the-ground conditions, the experience of people who churned and never wrote about it.
It came from an experiment: six agents were given research tasks unanswerable from the web. They issued 53 searches between them and zero aimed at reaching a human — every one went looking for archived humans instead, then closed with some version of "you should validate this with real users." The tool description keys off exactly that sentence.
Metadata
https://groundtruth-ruby.vercel.app/api/mcp(remote, nothing to install); stdio also available vianpx -y github:aniketshaw748-hub/groundtruth-mcpask_humans,check_answersReplies come back with a respondent count and per-person attribution, wrapped as untrusted data and never aggregated into sentiment. Questions are de-identified by default; anything carrying the user's private context requires their explicit approval first.
I searched the repo for the URL and project name — no duplicates.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code