Update pull_request_template.md - #26
Merged
Merged
Conversation
VCUclse405
approved these changes
May 21, 2026
VCUclse405
approved these changes
May 21, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add notebook integrity check workflow
Summary
This pull request adds a lightweight GitHub Actions workflow that validates the root-level Jupyter notebook structure whenever a notebook is changed in a pull request or pushed to
main.Type of change
What changed?
.github/workflows/notebook-check.yml..ipynbfiles can be parsed as JSON.cellsfield and that each cell hascell_typeandsource.Why is this change needed?
Direct notebook editing can easily introduce JSON errors, missing commas, or corrupted cell structure. This check provides a basic automated safeguard before merging notebook changes into
main.Reproducibility impact
Explanation:
This adds repository-level validation only. It does not change the notebook analysis logic, manuscript-baseline settings, metric definitions, dependencies, or outputs.
Testing / verification
.ipynbfiles or the workflow file itself.Manuscript or public-release relevance
Explanation:
This PR adds an automated repository check only. It does not affect submitted, archived, or manuscript-baseline numerical results.
Checklist