Feature Request: Show comment/note/name next to ID

[Impact123]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Using the new per-guest summary it's hard to tell which ID refers to which guest.

Describe the solution you'd like
Using the per-guest summary as example this

  /ns/pbs/ct/100 :   1.2GiB (1322780915 B)
  /ns/pve/vm/125 :   1.0GiB (1118879268 B)
  /ns/pve/ct/303 : 994.9MiB (1043184797 B)

could look like this

  /ns/pbs/ct/100 (somenamehere)            :   1.2GiB (1322780915 B)
  /ns/pve/vm/125 (someothernamehere)       :   1.0GiB (1118879268 B)
  /ns/pve/ct/303 (yetanothernamehere)      : 994.9MiB (1043184797 B)

This can be shown in the interactive selector and such as well, of course.

📂 Current path: /ns/NAMESPACEHERE/ct
> Use current path
  .. (up one level)
  100/ | somenamehere

It might make sense to limit the length and/or only grab the comment up to the first space or similar in case the default {{guestname}} changed.

Additional context
An example command that would print the comment for a ID could look like this

proxmox-backup-debug api get /admin/datastore/DATASTOREHERE/snapshots --ns NAMESPACEHERE --output-format json | jq -r 'map(select(.["backup-id"] == "IDHERE")) | .[-1].comment'

It feels kind of inelegant but I couldn't find a better way to extract this information and this is what the GUI uses.

[VoltKraft]

Thanks for the request.

In principle, this sounds like a very good idea. Being able to see the actual guest name would be much better than just the path and ID.
The problem I see is that the comment may contain not only the guest name, but also a lot of other stuff.
And it may also happen that the guest name does not appear at all.
Since I am currently not aware of any other option for reliably extracting the guest name, I will first add an optional function that can be activated if desired and then display the comment as well.

[Impact123]

Thank you! Yeah I thought about that, hence the limit/space suggestion. This seems to work very well for me. My only further suggestion would be to also add this information to the progress output as well. For example

📁 [19/28] /ns/pve/ct/327

💾 Saving all used chunks [19/28 /ns/pve/ct/327]
📄 Index [19/28 /ns/pve/ct/327] 50/50 (100.00%) | ⏱️ 0m 00s
➕ Summing up chunks [19/28 /ns/pve/ct/327]
📦 Chunk [19/28 /ns/pve/ct/327] 4932/4932 (100.00%) | 🧮 Size so far: 4.1GiB | ⏱️ 0m 00s
🧮 Total size: 4393934822 Bytes (4.1GiB)
⏱️ Evaluation duration: 0m 00s
🧩 Chunk usage summary:
  Unique chunks    :  4932   6.08% |  4.1GiB
  Duplicate refs   : 76130  93.92% | 57.3GiB
  Total references : 81062         | 61.4GiB

could become

📁 [19/28] /ns/pve/ct/327 (somenamehere)

💾 Saving all used chunks [19/28 /ns/pve/ct/327] (somenamehere)
📄 Index [19/28 /ns/pve/ct/327] (somenamehere) 50/50 (100.00%) | ⏱️ 0m 00s
➕ Summing up chunks [19/28 /ns/pve/ct/327] (somenamehere)
📦 Chunk [19/28 /ns/pve/ct/327] (somenamehere) 4932/4932 (100.00%) | 🧮 Size so far: 4.1GiB | ⏱️ 0m 00s
🧮 Total size: 4393934822 Bytes (4.1GiB)
⏱️ Evaluation duration: 0m 00s
🧩 Chunk usage summary:
  Unique chunks    :  4932   6.08% |  4.1GiB
  Duplicate refs   : 76130  93.92% | 57.3GiB
  Total references : 81062         | 61.4GiB

Might be a bit much to add it to every ID mention but it would be consistent.
That makes me think of something. Maybe the ID/name (and some other information) could be colored/highlighterd? I don't want to annoy you with suggestions though.