Conversation
WalkthroughThis change deletes the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
25-37: Nit: duplicatetypingsandtypeskeys
typesis a synonym fortypings; keeping both is harmless but redundant.- "typings": "./dist/index.d.ts", - "types": "./dist/index.d.ts", + "types": "./dist/index.d.ts",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to Reviews > Disable Knowledge Base setting
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
.yarn/releases/yarn-4.3.1.cjsis excluded by!**/.yarn/**pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.eslintignore(0 hunks).nvmrc(0 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- .eslintignore
- .nvmrc
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: test-with-docker
- GitHub Check: test-with-docker
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)
41-53: Ensure the lockfile is regeneratedAfter runtime dependency bumps, remember to commit the updated
pnpm-lock.yamlso CI and consumers get deterministic installs.
| "@ledgerhq/hw-transport-http": "^6.30.8", | ||
| "axios": "^1.11.0", | ||
| "axios-retry": "^4.5.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Double-check for breaking changes & security advisories in newly-bumped runtime deps
The bumps stay within the same major versions, so breaking-changes risk is low, but both @ledgerhq/hw-transport-http and axios have a history of shipping minor-version breaking changes and security patches.
Please run the full test-suite and scan the new versions for known CVEs before releasing.
Example commands:
🏁 Script executed:
# audit axios & ledger transport
pnpm audit --prod
# run tests to surface runtime regressions
pnpm testLength of output: 1742
High-Severity Vulnerability in axios via @ledgerhq/hw-transport-http – Upgrade Required
Our pnpm audit --prod surfaced a critical issue (GHSA-jr5f-v2jv-69x6):
The version of axios pulled in by @ledgerhq/hw-transport-http (<1.8.2) is vulnerable to SSRF and credential leakage. Although your top-level axios (^1.11.0) is already patched, the indirect dependency remains at risk.
Please address this by:
- Bumping
@ledgerhq/hw-transport-httpto a release that depends on axios ≥1.8.2 (e.g. upgrade to the latest 6.x patch), or adding a package resolution to force axios ≥1.8.2. - Running:
pnpm install pnpm audit --prod # should report 0 vulnerabilities pnpm test # ensure all specs pass locally
- Confirming no breaking changes have been introduced by reviewing changelogs and executing your full test suite.
Lines to update in package.json (approx. 44–46):
- "@ledgerhq/hw-transport-http": "^6.30.8",
+ "@ledgerhq/hw-transport-http": "^6.31.0", # or whichever 6.x+ release pins axios ≥1.8.2🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In package.json around lines 44 to 46, the dependency
@ledgerhq/hw-transport-http uses a vulnerable axios version below 1.8.2. To fix
this, upgrade @ledgerhq/hw-transport-http to the latest 6.x patch version that
depends on axios 1.8.2 or higher. After updating, run pnpm install, then pnpm
audit --prod to verify no vulnerabilities remain, and finally run pnpm test to
ensure no breaking changes affect the codebase.
| "@ledgerhq/hw-transport": "^6.31.8", | ||
| "@types/dockerode": "^3.3.42", | ||
| "@types/fs-extra": "^11.0.4", | ||
| "@types/node": "^24.0.15", | ||
| "@types/node": "^24.1.0", | ||
| "@types/pngjs": "^6.0.5", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@types/node@24.x does not match the declared Node >= 22 engine
@types/node follows Node’s even-number LTS cadence; 24.x targets an upcoming Node v24 release, while the project explicitly supports Node >= 22.
Mixing the two can provoke false typings or missing APIs at compile-time.
If you only intend to support Node 22, pin to @types/node@22.x instead:
- "@types/node": "^24.1.0",
+ "@types/node": "^22.0.0",Otherwise, update the "engines.node" field and CI matrix accordingly.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "@ledgerhq/hw-transport": "^6.31.8", | |
| "@types/dockerode": "^3.3.42", | |
| "@types/fs-extra": "^11.0.4", | |
| "@types/node": "^24.0.15", | |
| "@types/node": "^24.1.0", | |
| "@types/pngjs": "^6.0.5", | |
| "@ledgerhq/hw-transport": "^6.31.8", | |
| "@types/dockerode": "^3.3.42", | |
| "@types/fs-extra": "^11.0.4", | |
| - "@types/node": "^24.1.0", | |
| + "@types/node": "^22.0.0", | |
| "@types/pngjs": "^6.0.5", |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In package.json around lines 56 to 60, the version of @types/node is set to
24.x, which does not align with the declared Node engine version >= 22. To fix
this, either change the @types/node version to 22.x to match the supported Node
version or update the "engines.node" field and the CI configuration to support
Node 24. Choose one approach to ensure consistency between the Node engine
version and the @types/node typings.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
.nvmrcfile specifying the Node.js version..eslintignorefile, which may result in ESLint processing additional directories.