Skip to content

@logtape/syslog: syslog log injection via unescaped control characters and unvalidated SD-NAME keys

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 16, 2026 in dahlia/logtape • Updated Aug 26, 2026

Package

npm @logtape/syslog (npm)

Affected versions

>= 2.1.0, <= 2.1.4
>= 2.0.0, < 2.0.14
< 1.3.11

Patched versions

2.1.5
2.0.14
1.3.11

Description

@logtape/syslog contains two related output-encoding bugs in the structured data formatting code. Both only affect deployments with includeStructuredData: true, which is non-default.

1. Unescaped C0 control characters in structured data values

escapeStructuredDataValue() in packages/syslog/src/syslog.ts escapes \, ", and ] per RFC 5424 but does not escape newline (\n), carriage return (\r), or any other C0 control characters (U+0000–U+001F):

function escapeStructuredDataValue(value: string): string {
  return value
    .replace(/\\/g, "\\\\")
    .replace(/"/g, '\\"')
    .replace(/]/g, "\\]");
  // \n, \r, and other C0 control characters are not escaped
}

TCP syslog commonly uses \n as a frame delimiter (RFC 6587, non-transparent framing). If an attacker-controlled value contains a literal newline, that newline terminates the current syslog frame. Bytes following the newline begin a new frame, and if they form a valid RFC 5424 header (<PRI>1 …), a downstream collector will accept them as a separate, authentic-looking syslog record.

2. Unvalidated SD-NAME keys

Structured data parameter keys are inserted into the message without validation or escaping:

elements.push(`${key}="${escapedValue}"`);

RFC 5424 defines SD-NAME as printable US-ASCII characters excluding =, ], ", and space, with a maximum length of 32. A key containing any of those characters, control characters, or exceeding the length limit will produce malformed structured data. If the key itself contains an embedded ], it can prematurely close the structured-data element.

In typical usage, property keys are developer-defined string literals and therefore safe. However, if an application forwards attacker-controlled keys as log properties—for example by spreading request headers or arbitrary metadata into a log record—this becomes a second injection path.

Proof of concept

The following Node.js snippet (no dependencies, no network required) demonstrates that the escaped value still contains a literal newline:

function escapeStructuredDataValue(value) {
  return value
    .replace(/\\/g, "\\\\")
    .replace(/"/g, '\\"')
    .replace(/]/g, "\\]");
}

const payload =
  'normal\n<134>1 2026-01-01T00:00:00Z forged evil - - - INJECTED';

const result = escapeStructuredDataValue(payload);
console.log("Newline present after escape:", result.includes("\n")); // true

Tested with Node.js 22.17.1.

Impact

An attacker who controls log property values can:

  • forge syslog records attributed to arbitrary hosts, applications, or process IDs;
  • insert records with arbitrary severity or facility levels;
  • obscure malicious activity by injecting misleading entries around legitimate ones;
  • break downstream log parsers or SIEM correlation rules that rely on log integrity.

Affected downstream collectors include rsyslog, syslog-ng, Splunk, Elastic Stack, and any other system using RFC 6587 non-transparent framing.

Suggested fix

Structured data values

Escape all C0 control characters (U+0000–U+001F) in addition to \, ", and ]. RFC 5424 does not define an escape sequence for control characters in PARAM-VALUE; the most interoperable approach is to strip or replace them:

function escapeStructuredDataValue(value: string): string {
  return value
    .replace(/\\/g, "\\\\")
    .replace(/"/g, '\\"')
    .replace(/]/g, "\\]")
    .replace(/[\x00-\x1f]/g, (c) =>
      `\\x${c.charCodeAt(0).toString(16).padStart(2, "0")}`
    );
}

Alternatively, strip them entirely: .replace(/[\x00-\x1f]/g, ""). The right choice depends on whether downstream consumers need some representation of the original value.

SD-NAME keys

Validate each key against the RFC 5424 SD-NAME grammar before including it. Keys that fail validation should be skipped or sanitized:

// SD-NAME: printable US-ASCII, excluding '=', ']', '"', SP; max 32 chars
const SD_NAME_RE = /^[!-<>-Z\\^-z|~]{1,32}$/;

for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(record.properties)) {
  if (!SD_NAME_RE.test(key)) continue;
  const escapedValue = escapeStructuredDataValue(String(value));
  elements.push(`${key}="${escapedValue}"`);
}

References

@dahlia dahlia published to dahlia/logtape Jun 16, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 26, 2026
Reviewed Aug 26, 2026
Last updated Aug 26, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(23rd percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')

The product uses CRLF (carriage return line feeds) as a special element, e.g. to separate lines or records, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CRLF sequences from inputs. Learn more on MITRE.

Improper Output Neutralization for Logs

The product constructs a log message from external input, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements when the message is written to a log file. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-54511

GHSA ID

GHSA-8h6h-x5pq-56fq

Source code

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.