Skip to content

Kirby has XML injection in its XML creator toolkit

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Apr 23, 2026 in getkirby/kirby • Updated Apr 27, 2026

Package

composer getkirby/cms (Composer)

Affected versions

< 4.9.0
>= 5.0.0, < 5.4.0

Patched versions

4.9.0
5.4.0

Description

TL;DR

This vulnerability only affects Kirby sites that use the Xml data handler (e.g. Data::encode($string, 'xml')) or the Xml::create(), Xml::tag() or Xml::value() method(s) in site or plugin code. The Kirby core does not use any of the affected methods.

If consumers use an affected method and cannot rule out input to these methods controlled by an attacker, Kirby strongly recommends that they update to a patch release.

Introduction

XML strings contain structured data in tags and attributes. Depending on the used XML schema, this data can carry specific meaning that can lead to actions in other systems that parse and act on the XML data. Tags and attributes are detected based on their specific syntax, which includes characters such as <, >, ", and &. If these characters are to be used verbatim in text within the XML string, they can be escaped using a <![CDATA[ ]]> block.

XML injection is an attack on a system generating or parsing XML files. By injecting special characters into input data, XML output with a malicious meaning could be generated by a vulnerable system.

Impact

Kirby's Xml::value() method has special handling for <![CDATA[ ]]> blocks. If the input value is already valid CDATA, it is not escaped a second time but allowed to pass through. However it was possible to trick this check into allowing values that only contained a valid CDATA block but also contained other structured data outside of the CDATA block. This structured data would then also be allowed to pass through, circumventing the value protection.

The Xml::value() method is used in Xml::tag(), Xml::create() and in the Xml data handler (e.g. Data::encode($string, 'xml')).

Both the vulnerable methods and the data handler are not used in the Kirby core. However they may be used in site or plugin code, e.g. to create XML strings from input data. If those generated files are passed to another implementation that assigns specific meaning to the XML schema, manipulation of this system's behavior is possible.

Kirby sites that don't use XML generation in site or plugin code are not affected.

Patches

The problem has been patched in Kirby 4.9.0 and Kirby 5.4.0. Please update to one of these or a later version to fix the vulnerability.

In all of the mentioned releases, Kirby has added additional checks that only allow unchanged CDATA passthrough if the entire string is made up of valid CDATA blocks and no structured data. This protects all uses of the method against the described vulnerability.

Credits

Kirby thanks to Patrick Falb (@dapatrese) at FORMER 03 for responsibly reporting the identified issue.

References

@bastianallgeier bastianallgeier published to getkirby/kirby Apr 23, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Apr 23, 2026
Reviewed Apr 23, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Apr 24, 2026
Last updated Apr 27, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements Present
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity High
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(27th percentile)

Weaknesses

XML Injection (aka Blind XPath Injection)

The product does not properly neutralize special elements that are used in XML, allowing attackers to modify the syntax, content, or commands of the XML before it is processed by an end system. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-32870

GHSA ID

GHSA-9wfj-c55w-j9qr

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.