Skip to content

motionEye: LFI → pass‑the‑hash admin → unsafe restore → unauth action exec (RCE)

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 20, 2026 in motioneye-project/motioneye • Updated Jun 23, 2026

Package

pip motioneye (pip)

Affected versions

< 0.44.0

Patched versions

0.44.0

Description

Summary

A multi‑stage chain in motionEye leads to remote code execution. The chain combines:

  1. Arbitrary file read (LFI) via the picture download endpoint for local motion cameras using absolute paths.
  2. Pass‑the‑hash admin auth due to accepting request signatures computed with password hashes.
  3. Unsafe config restore that extracts attacker‑controlled tarballs into CONF_PATH.
  4. Unauthenticated action execution via /action/<id>/<action>.

If the normal user password is unset, the chain becomes unauthenticated RCE. If a normal password exists, a normal user can still achieve admin escalation and RCE.


Affected Code (motionEye repo)

1) LFI (absolute path) — picture/<id>/download

Files:

  • motioneye/motioneye/handlers/picture.pydownload() (local motion camera branch)
  • motioneye/motioneye/mediafiles.pyget_media_content()

Issue: get_media_content() only blocks .. and then joins target_dir with path. Absolute paths (e.g. /etc/hosts) bypass the join and are read directly.

2) Pass‑the‑hash admin auth

File: motioneye/motioneye/handlers/base.pyget_current_user()

Issue: The signature check allows signatures computed using the admin password hash (SHA1) as the key. If the hash is leaked (via LFI), admin access can be obtained without the plaintext password.

3) Unsafe restore (tar extraction)

File: motioneye/motioneye/config.pyrestore()

Issue: tar zxC CONF_PATH is used on user‑supplied data without sanitizing entries. A crafted tar can drop executable files into CONF_PATH.

4) Unauthenticated action execution

File: motioneye/motioneye/handlers/action.pypost()

Issue: No authentication decorator is present. It executes <action>_<camera_id> found in CONF_PATH with subprocess.Popen.


Exploit Chain (Detailed)

  1. Create or find a local motion camera id (local motion cameras are required for the vulnerable LFI path).
  2. LFI via picture download:
    • Request: /picture/<id>/download/<absolute_path>
    • Example: /picture/1/download/%2Fetc%2Fhosts
    • Result: Arbitrary file read.
  3. Read admin hash from /etc/motioneye/motion.conf:
    • Contains @admin_password <SHA1_HASH>.
  4. Pass‑the‑hash admin:
    • Compute signature for /config/restore?_username=admin using the hash as key.
    • Admin access is accepted with hash‑based signatures.
  5. Restore malicious tar:
    • Upload a tar containing lock_<id> (or any action) as an executable.
    • File is written into CONF_PATH by restore.
  6. Trigger unauth action:
    • POST /action/<id>/lock
    • The server executes the injected file.

Proof of Execution (Observed Output)

In local testing, the injected action created a marker file:

/tmp/meye_rce_ok

Verification command:

docker exec -it motioneye ls -la /tmp | grep meye_rce_ok

Example output:

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 ... /tmp/meye_rce_ok

Preconditions / Requirements

  • At least one local motion camera exists (e.g., netcam_url, videodevice).
  • picture/<id>/download is reachable:
    • Unauth if @normal_password is empty (default in some installs).
    • Auth required if normal password is set (attacker needs normal creds).

Impact

  • Unauth RCE (normal password unset).
  • Authenticated RCE (normal user → admin → RCE).
  • Arbitrary file read on server filesystem.
  • Full compromise of motionEye process account.

Suggested Fixes

  1. Block absolute paths in get_media_content() and get_media_path().
  2. Remove hash‑based signature acceptance; only accept signatures computed with plaintext passwords.
  3. Harden restore: reject absolute paths, .., symlinks, non‑regular files.
  4. Require authentication on ActionHandler (admin‑only).

References

@MichaIng MichaIng published to motioneye-project/motioneye Jun 20, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 23, 2026
Reviewed Jun 23, 2026
Last updated Jun 23, 2026

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. Learn more on MITRE.

Improper Privilege Management

The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. Learn more on MITRE.

Missing Authentication for Critical Function

The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources. Learn more on MITRE.

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data. Learn more on MITRE.

Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type

The product allows the upload or transfer of dangerous file types that are automatically processed within its environment. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-qxvg-h7q2-hcxh

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.