Skip to content

OpenTelemetry eBPF Instrumentation: CPU-mismatch fallback uses 256-byte buffer with 8KB size

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 12, 2026 in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-ebpf-instrumentation • Updated Jun 9, 2026

Package

gomod go.opentelemetry.io/obi (Go)

Affected versions

< 0.9.0

Patched versions

0.9.0

Description

Summary

The per-CPU message-buffer fallback path uses a 256-byte backup buffer but preserves the original payload size, which can be up to 8KB. If a CPU mismatch occurs, OBI can read beyond the fallback buffer and leak adjacent memory into telemetry.

Details

https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-ebpf-instrumentation/blob/032473449b53d9f02ec4619d4f5b84e6a81db362/bpf/common/http_buf_size.h#L4-L7

k_kprobes_http2_buf_size is defined as 256 bytes, the size of the fallback buffer.

https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-ebpf-instrumentation/blob/032473449b53d9f02ec4619d4f5b84e6a81db362/bpf/common/msg_buffer.h#L12-L36

Introduces 8KB per-CPU buffer and 256-byte fallback_buf in msg_buffer_t, creating a size mismatch for fallback use.

https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-ebpf-instrumentation/blob/032473449b53d9f02ec4619d4f5b84e6a81db362/bpf/generictracer/k_tracer.c#L370-L394

On CPU mismatch, fallback_buf is used but size is still set to m_buf->real_size (up to 8KB) and passed downstream.

https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-ebpf-instrumentation/blob/032473449b53d9f02ec4619d4f5b84e6a81db362/bpf/generictracer/protocol_http.h#L412-L441

bytes_len (from m_buf->real_size) is used to read payload data from u_buf; if u_buf is the 256B fallback, this can over-read and leak memory into telemetry.

https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-ebpf-instrumentation/blob/032473449b53d9f02ec4619d4f5b84e6a81db362/bpf/tpinjector/tpinjector.c#L192-L206

real_size is set up to 8192 bytes and stored with cpu_id; fallback_buf only contains 256 bytes.

PoC

Local testing with an AddressSanitizer user-space PoC reproduced the same class of size-mismatch over-read as the vulnerable fallback-buffer path. That result is sufficient to ground the advisory in a fresh local reproduction even though the exact end-to-end eBPF path still depends on host BPF capabilities.

To reproduce the validated behavior locally:

  1. create a struct that models fallback_buf[256] and real_size
  2. populate only the 256-byte fallback buffer
  3. simulate the CPU mismatch path by using the fallback buffer as the source pointer while preserving a much larger real_size
  4. perform a read of real_size bytes from that 256-byte backing store under ASan

An equivalent reproducer is:

// save as /tmp/poc_msgbuf_oob.c
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>

struct msg_buffer {
  unsigned char fallback_buf[256];
  uint16_t pos;
  uint16_t real_size;
  uint32_t cpu_id;
};

int main(void) {
  struct msg_buffer m = {0};
  unsigned char sink[8192];

  memset(m.fallback_buf, 'A', sizeof(m.fallback_buf));
  m.real_size = 4096;

  memcpy(sink, m.fallback_buf, m.real_size);
  printf("copied %u bytes from a 256-byte fallback buffer\n", m.real_size);
  return 0;
}

Compile and run with ASan:

cc -fsanitize=address -O1 -g -o /tmp/poc_msgbuf_oob /tmp/poc_msgbuf_oob.c
ASAN_OPTIONS=abort_on_error=1 /tmp/poc_msgbuf_oob

Expected result:

AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow or stack-buffer-overflow

That user-space PoC matches the size-mismatch condition in the vulnerable code path, even though the exact end-to-end eBPF runtime path still requires host BPF attach/load capability.

Impact

This is a confidentiality issue in the HTTP tracing path. The vulnerable read occurs in OBI's local fallback-buffer handling when context propagation is enabled, the tpinjector sock_msg path is active, HTTP large-buffer capture is configured with a non-zero size, and a CPU mismatch occurs between producer and consumer contexts. Under those conditions, OBI can over-read from the fallback buffer and export unrelated memory through telemetry.

References

Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 18, 2026
Reviewed May 18, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jun 2, 2026
Last updated Jun 9, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(21st percentile)

Weaknesses

Out-of-bounds Read

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer. Learn more on MITRE.

Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency

The product parses a formatted message or structure, but it does not handle or incorrectly handles a length field that is inconsistent with the actual length of the associated data. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-45681

GHSA ID

GHSA-r6c9-g6q5-qrf9

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.