| description | Onion-model middleware: before/after/on_error phases, priority ordering, input/output mutation, error-recovery short-circuit, function adapters, thread-safe snapshot, logging/retry. |
|---|
Type: Implementation guide. Normative spec: PROTOCOL_SPEC §11.1 Middleware/Interceptors.
Composable middleware pipeline using the onion execution model with before/after/on_error phases. Each middleware can inspect and modify inputs before module execution, transform outputs after execution, and participate in error recovery when failures occur. The pipeline supports both full subclass-based middleware and lightweight function adapters for simple use cases.
- Provide a base
Middlewareclass with no-op defaults for all three lifecycle phases (before, after, on_error), allowing subclasses to override only the methods they need. - Implement onion-model execution: before hooks run in registration order, after hooks run in reverse registration order, and on_error hooks run in reverse order over only the middlewares that executed before the failure. When middleware has explicit priority values (0-1000), higher priority executes first per PROTOCOL_SPEC. When priorities are equal, registration order applies.
- Support input modification in
before()(return a new dict to replace inputs, or None to pass through unchanged) and output modification inafter()(same contract). - Support error recovery:
on_error()handlers are called in reverse order; the first handler to return a non-None dict provides recovery output, short-circuiting the remaining handlers. - Provide
BeforeMiddlewareandAfterMiddlewareadapters that wrap plain callback functions as middleware instances, reducing boilerplate for single-phase hooks. - Include a
LoggingMiddlewarewith structured logging, security-aware redaction of inputs viacontext.redacted_inputs, and per-call duration tracking stored incontext.data. - Wrap before-phase failures in
MiddlewareChainErrorcarrying both the original exception and the list of executed middlewares, enabling targeted error recovery. - Ensure all mutations to the middleware list are thread-safe.
The middleware system follows a classic onion (layered) execution model. The MiddlewareManager holds an ordered list of Middleware instances and provides three execution methods corresponding to the module call lifecycle:
-
execute_before() -> tuple[dict, list[Middleware]]-- Iterates middlewares in registration order. Each middleware'sbefore()receives the current inputs and may return a replacement dict. Returns both the (possibly modified) inputs and the list of executed middlewares (for error rollback inexecute_on_error). If a middleware raises, aMiddlewareChainErroris raised with the list of already-executed middlewares attached. -
execute_after()-- Iterates middlewares in reverse registration order. Each middleware'safter()receives both original inputs and the current output, and may return a replacement output dict. -
execute_on_error(module_id, inputs, error, context, executed_middlewares)-- Iterates theexecuted_middlewareslist (from the before phase) in reverse order. The first handler to return a non-None dict becomes the recovery output. If a handler itself raises, the exception is logged and iteration continues.
The MiddlewareManager uses a lock-protected snapshot pattern for thread safety. Before each execution pass, snapshot() acquires the lock, copies the middleware list, and releases the lock. The execution then iterates over the snapshot without holding the lock, so concurrent add()/remove() calls do not interfere with in-flight pipelines.
Middleware(base class) -- Plain class (not ABC) with three methods returning None by default. Subclasses override only what they need.MiddlewareManager-- Manages the ordered list and orchestrates the three execution phases. Uses a lock with the snapshot pattern for thread safety.BeforeMiddleware/AfterMiddleware-- Lightweight adapters wrapping a single callback function as a fullMiddlewaresubclass. Non-overridden phases remain no-ops.LoggingMiddleware-- Structured logging middleware that records start time incontext.data["_apcore.mw.logging.start_time"]duringbefore(), computes duration inafter(), and usescontext.redacted_inputsto avoid leaking sensitive data. Configurable vialog_inputs,log_outputs, andlog_errorsflags.RetryMiddleware-- Built-in middleware that retries failed module calls with configurable backoff strategies (exponential or fixed). Only retries errors markedretryable=True. Supportsmax_retries,base_delay_ms,max_delay_ms, and jitter. See Middleware Guide for configuration details.MiddlewareChainError-- Exception subclass carryingoriginal(the root cause) andexecuted_middlewares(the list of middlewares whosebefore()was called, for targeted error recovery).
Inputs --> [MW1.before] --> [MW2.before] --> [MW3.before] --> Module.execute()
|
Output <-- [MW1.after] <-- [MW2.after] <-- [MW3.after] <------+
On Error (if MW3.before fails):
[MW2.on_error] <-- [MW3.on_error]
(MW1.on_error is not called because MW3 is where before failed,
and recovery walks backwards through executed middlewares)
=== "Python" ```python from apcore import APCore from apcore.middleware import Middleware, BeforeMiddleware, AfterMiddleware
client = APCore()
# Subclass-based middleware
class AuditMiddleware(Middleware):
def before(self, module_id, inputs, context):
print(f"[AUDIT] calling {module_id}")
def after(self, module_id, inputs, output, context):
print(f"[AUDIT] {module_id} returned {output}")
# Register middleware
client.use(AuditMiddleware())
# Lightweight function adapters
client.use_before(lambda module_id, inputs, ctx: print(f"Before: {module_id}"))
client.use_after(lambda module_id, inputs, out, ctx: print(f"After: {module_id}"))
@client.module(id="greet", description="Say hello")
def greet(name: str) -> dict:
return {"message": f"Hello, {name}!"}
result = client.call("greet", {"name": "World"})
```
=== "TypeScript" ```typescript import { APCore, Middleware, BeforeMiddleware, AfterMiddleware } from "apcore-js";
const client = new APCore();
// Subclass-based middleware
class AuditMiddleware extends Middleware {
before(moduleId: string, inputs: Record<string, unknown>, context: unknown) {
console.log(`[AUDIT] calling ${moduleId}`);
}
after(moduleId: string, inputs: Record<string, unknown>, output: Record<string, unknown>, context: unknown) {
console.log(`[AUDIT] ${moduleId} returned`, output);
}
}
// Register middleware
client.use(new AuditMiddleware());
// Lightweight function adapters
client.useBefore((moduleId, inputs, ctx) => { console.log(`Before: ${moduleId}`); return null; });
client.useAfter((moduleId, inputs, out, ctx) => { console.log(`After: ${moduleId}`); return null; });
client.module({
id: "greet",
description: "Say hello",
inputSchema: { type: "object", properties: { name: { type: "string" } } },
outputSchema: { type: "object", properties: { message: { type: "string" } } },
execute: ({ name }: { name: string }) => ({ message: `Hello, ${name}!` }),
});
const result = await client.call("greet", { name: "World" });
```
=== "Rust" ```rust use apcore::APCore; use apcore::middleware::Middleware; use apcore::context::Context; use apcore::errors::ModuleError; use async_trait::async_trait; use serde_json::Value;
struct AuditMiddleware;
#[async_trait]
impl Middleware for AuditMiddleware {
async fn before(
&self,
module_id: &str,
inputs: &Value,
_ctx: &Context<Value>,
) -> Result<Option<Value>, ModuleError> {
println!("[AUDIT] calling {}", module_id);
Ok(None)
}
async fn after(
&self,
module_id: &str,
_inputs: &Value,
output: &Value,
_ctx: &Context<Value>,
) -> Result<Option<Value>, ModuleError> {
println!("[AUDIT] {} returned {:?}", module_id, output);
Ok(None)
}
}
let mut client = APCore::new();
client.use_middleware(Box::new(AuditMiddleware));
```
apcore.context.Context-- Execution context passed to all middleware methods, providestrace_id,caller_id,redacted_inputs, anddatadict for per-call state storage.
??? info "Python SDK reference"
The following tables are not protocol requirements — they document the Python SDK's source layout and runtime dependencies for implementers/users of apcore-python.
**Source files:**
| File | Lines | Purpose |
|------|-------|---------|
| `src/apcore/middleware/__init__.py` | 16 | Package re-exports for convenient imports |
| `src/apcore/middleware/base.py` | 36 | `Middleware` base class with no-op defaults |
| `src/apcore/middleware/manager.py` | 129 | `MiddlewareManager` and `MiddlewareChainError` |
| `src/apcore/middleware/logging.py` | 94 | `LoggingMiddleware` with structured logging and redaction |
| `src/apcore/middleware/adapters.py` | 43 | `BeforeMiddleware` and `AfterMiddleware` function adapters |
| `src/apcore/middleware/retry.py` | ~190 | `RetryMiddleware` with configurable backoff strategies (exponential/fixed) |
**Runtime dependencies:**
- `threading` (stdlib) -- Lock for thread-safe middleware list management.
- `logging` (stdlib) -- Standard library logging used by `LoggingMiddleware` and manager error reporting.
- `time` (stdlib) -- Wall-clock timing for duration measurements in `LoggingMiddleware`.
Tests are split across two files targeting different abstraction levels:
- Middleware base class: Verifies it is not an ABC, can be instantiated directly, all methods return None by default, and subclasses can selectively override methods.
- BeforeMiddleware adapter: Confirms it is a
Middlewaresubclass, delegatesbefore()to the callback, and leavesafter()/on_error()as no-ops. Validates correct argument forwarding. - AfterMiddleware adapter: Same structure as
BeforeMiddlewaretests but for theafter()phase.
- add/remove: Verifies append ordering, identity-based removal, and return values.
- execute_before: Tests registration-order execution, input replacement via returned dicts, None passthrough,
MiddlewareChainErroron failure with correctexecuted_middlewarestracking, and empty-list passthrough. - execute_after: Tests reverse-order execution, output replacement, None passthrough, exception propagation, and empty-list passthrough.
- execute_on_error: Tests reverse iteration over executed middlewares, first-dict-wins recovery, None continuation, exception-in-handler logging and continuation, and empty-list returns None.
- Thread safety: Concurrent
add()with no lost middlewares (10 threads x 50 adds), snapshot consistency after mutations, and concurrentadd()+snapshot()with no exceptions (5 writer + 5 reader threads).
- Full pipeline tests exercising middleware through the
Executor.call()path.
module_id(str/string/&str, required) — ID of the module about to executeinputs(dict/object/Value, required) — module inputs (may be modified and returned)context(Context, required) — current execution context
- Any error raised by the middleware propagates and aborts the execution pipeline (downstream middlewares'
beforehooks are skipped;on_errorhooks of already-executed middlewares are invoked)
- On success:
dict/Record<string, unknown>/Valueor None/null/() — modified inputs (or None to pass inputs unchanged)
- async: language-dependent (Python allows sync or async; TypeScript and Rust MUST be async)
- thread_safe: true (called under executor lock on shared mutable state)
- pure: false (may mutate context or inputs)
- Any error raised by the middleware propagates immediately (fail-fast): Python, TypeScript, and Rust all stop the
afterchain at the first error and propagate it without running the remaining hooks. See protocol-spec.md §Middleware for the normative MUST.
module_id(str/string/&str, required)inputs(dict/object/Value, required)output(dict/object/Value, required) — module outputcontext(Context, required)
- On success:
dict/Record<string, unknown>/Valueor None/null/() — modified output (or None to pass unchanged)
- async: language-dependent
- thread_safe: true
module_id(str/string/&str, required)inputs(dict/object/Value, required)error(ModuleError, required) — the error that terminated executioncontext(Context, required)
- No errors raised (on_error MUST NOT raise)
- On success with recovery:
dict/Record<string, unknown>/Value— replacement output; Python and TypeScript return immediately on first recovery value; Rust continues calling all hooks but keeps first recovery. See note underMiddleware.after. - On pass-through: None/null/None — signals no recovery; error continues propagating
- async: language-dependent
- thread_safe: true
Context keys in context.data are partitioned by namespace to prevent collisions between framework internals and user extensions.
Normative rules:
- Framework-owned keys MUST use the
_apcore.*prefix (e.g.,_apcore.mw.logging.start_time). - User extensions MUST use the
ext.*prefix (e.g.,ext.my_company.request_id). - Implementations MUST NOT write to keys in the other party's namespace. A framework implementation MUST NOT write
ext.*keys; user middleware MUST NOT write_apcore.*keys. - Keys that begin with neither prefix are allowed for backward compatibility but SHOULD be migrated to one of the two namespaces.
Canonical _apcore.* keys:
| Key | Set by | Value |
|---|---|---|
_apcore.mw.logging.start_time |
LoggingMiddleware.before() |
Wall-clock time (float, seconds since epoch) at the start of the module call |
_apcore.mw.tracing.spans |
TracingMiddleware.before() |
Stack of active spans for the current trace. A stack, not a single id: modules call modules, so a single slot is overwritten on the first nested call. Each entry links parent_span_id to the one below it. |
_apcore.mw.tracing.sampled |
TracingMiddleware.before() |
The sampling decision for this trace |
_apcore.mw.circuit.state |
CircuitBreakerMiddleware.before() |
Circuit state string: CLOSED, OPEN, or HALF_OPEN |
The CircuitBreakerMiddleware tracks per-module error rates and latencies, and opens a circuit when thresholds are exceeded, preventing calls to unhealthy modules.
Normative rules:
CircuitBreakerMiddlewareMUST track per-(module_id,caller_id) error statistics in a configurable rolling window.- When the error rate in the window exceeds
open_threshold(default:0.5), the circuit for that pair MUST transition toOPEN. InOPENstate, calls MUST be short-circuited and MUST raiseCircuitBreakerOpenError. - The circuit MUST transition to
HALF_OPENafterrecovery_window_ms(default:30000) has elapsed since the circuit opened. InHALF_OPENstate, exactly one probe call is allowed through. A successful probe transitions the circuit toCLOSED; a failed probe transitions it back toOPEN. CircuitBreakerMiddlewareMUST store the current circuit state incontext.data["_apcore.mw.circuit.state"]on every call.- Implementations MUST emit
apcore.circuit.openedandapcore.circuit.closedevents via theEventEmitterwhen state transitions occur.
=== "Python" ```python from apcore import APCore from apcore.middleware import CircuitBreakerMiddleware
client = APCore()
client.use(CircuitBreakerMiddleware(
open_threshold=0.3, # open if >30% of calls fail
recovery_window_ms=60000, # probe after 60 seconds
window_size=20, # rolling window of 20 calls
))
result = client.call("executor.payment.charge", {"amount": 100})
```
=== "TypeScript" ```typescript import { APCore, CircuitBreakerMiddleware } from "apcore-js";
const client = new APCore();
client.use(new CircuitBreakerMiddleware({
openThreshold: 0.3, // open if >30% of calls fail
recoveryWindowMs: 60000, // probe after 60 seconds
windowSize: 20, // rolling window of 20 calls
}));
const result = await client.call("executor.payment.charge", { amount: 100 });
```
=== "Rust" ```rust use apcore::APCore; use apcore::middleware::CircuitBreakerMiddleware;
let mut client = APCore::new();
client.use_middleware(Box::new(
CircuitBreakerMiddleware::builder()
.open_threshold(0.3) // open if >30% of calls fail
.recovery_window_ms(60_000) // probe after 60 seconds
.window_size(20) // rolling window of 20 calls
.build(),
));
let result = client.call("executor.payment.charge", json!({ "amount": 100 })).await?;
```
This section is withdrawn. TracingMiddleware is specified once, in
observability.md § Tracing Architecture,
and protocol-spec.md §12 is the normative source for the span it creates.
§1.3 previously described a second, weaker formulation of the same middleware. It was withdrawn rather than implemented because every one of its rules either duplicated or contradicted the surviving one:
- Span name. §1.3 required the span name to equal
module_id.protocol-spec.mdrequiresapcore.module.execute(conformance T08-007), with the module id carried as an attribute. The protocol specification is the source of truth, and it is also the correct practice: a span name per module is high-cardinality, which the OpenTelemetry semantic conventions advise against — so the section labelled "OpenTelemetry-Compatible" prescribed the less OTel-compatible of the two. - Storage. §1.3 required a single span id in
context.data["_apcore.mw.tracing.span_id"]. Modules call modules, so a single slot is overwritten on the first nested call. The surviving contract stores a stack in_apcore.mw.tracing.spansand linksparent_span_idexplicitly. That is not a stylistic difference; it is the correct solution to a problem the single-slot form did not model. traceparentpropagation. §1.3 carried a SHOULD to propagate W3Ctraceparentto outbound calls. No SDK implemented it, because the extension point it needs does not exist: there is no outbound-call hook to attach it to. Reinstating it requires that hook first, which is a separate feature.- No-op without the OpenTelemetry SDK. This rule survives and is stated in observability.md.
The two shared the _apcore.mw.tracing.* context-data namespace, which is what makes
them the same middleware rather than two: that prefix is a single framework
middleware's private space by definition.
!!! note "Nothing was removed from any SDK's capability"
No SDK ever provided the §1.3 surface as a usable product. apcore-python never
implemented it; apcore-typescript's implementation was never re-exported from the
package root, so it was unreachable; apcore-rust renamed its copy to
OtelTracingMiddleware to dodge the name clash and documented its
propagate_traceparent as behaviourally inert. Each SDK was working around the
collision rather than offering a second capability — and §1.3's own Python example
imported from apcore import TracingMiddleware, which resolves to the
observability one. The section demonstrated itself with the other middleware's
import.
Config-over-code: middleware chains SHOULD be configurable via apcore.yaml without writing any application code.
middleware:
- type: "tracing"
match_modules: ["executor.*"]
- type: "circuit_breaker"
open_threshold: 0.3
recovery_window_ms: 60000
- type: "logging"
log_inputs: true
log_outputs: false
- type: "custom"
handler: "myapp.middleware.RateLimiter"
config:
requests_per_second: 100Normative rules:
- Implementations MUST support at minimum the
tracing,circuit_breaker, andloggingbuilt-in middleware types via YAML configuration. - Custom middleware types MUST be resolvable via a dotted module path supplied in the
handlerfield (e.g.,myapp.middleware.RateLimiter). Implementations MUST raise a clear configuration error if the handler cannot be imported or does not implement theMiddlewareinterface. - The
match_modulesfield, when present, restricts the middleware to module IDs matching the provided glob patterns. When absent, the middleware applies to all modules.
Incorrect async detection causes middleware to be invoked synchronously when it should be awaited, silently swallowing results.
!!! warning
Using isawaitable(handler) in Python always returns False for non-called functions — it tests whether an object is awaitable, not whether a function is a coroutine function. Use inspect.iscoroutinefunction(handler) instead.
Normative rules:
- Python: Implementations MUST use
inspect.iscoroutinefunction(handler)to detect async handlers. Usingisawaitable(handler)on an uncalled function is incorrect and MUST NOT be used for this purpose. - TypeScript: Implementations MUST check
handler.constructor.name === 'AsyncFunction'to detect async handlers before invocation. Checkinginstanceof Promiseafter invocation is too late (the function has already been called synchronously). Preferred approach: inspect the function itself viahandler.constructor.name. - Rust: Async handlers are statically typed via
async_trait; no runtime detection is needed or possible.
handler(callable/Function/fn, required) — the middleware function to inspect
- None
- On success: bool/boolean/bool —
trueif the handler is asynchronous,falseotherwise
- async: false
- thread_safe: true
- pure: true
- idempotent: true
Module-level middleware (before / after / on_error) wraps the entire 11-step pipeline. Pipeline step middleware is a finer-grained extension point: it wraps the execution of a single named pipeline step (e.g., input_validation, acl_check, execute). This is the lifecycle-shaped surface for the step-level middleware concept introduced in core-executor.md §1.3 — that section states the ordering guarantee relative to global middleware, while this section is the normative contract for the callbacks themselves. There is no next-callback wrapper form: the hooks observe the step, they do not wrap the call.
A registered StepMiddleware participates in three callbacks per step invocation:
before_step(step_name, state)
--> step body executes
|
+-- on success: after_step(step_name, state, result)
+-- on failure: on_step_error(step_name, state, error)
state is the PipelineState view — the step name, the outputs produced so far,
and the pipeline context. It is a single growable parameter rather than a
ctx / inputs pair, because a step takes no inputs argument: every step
is execute(ctx), and reads whatever it needs off the context. All three SDKs
converged on this shape independently.
state.outputs maps step name → that step's output, and it contains exactly the
steps that completed before the current one. The current step is never present,
in any of the three hooks:
| Hook | Why the current step is absent |
|---|---|
before_step |
It has not run. |
on_step_error |
It ran and failed; there is no output. |
after_step |
It succeeded, and its output is the result parameter. |
This is one rule with one meaning, deliberately, rather than the more obvious
"outputs of completed steps" — which would make after_step the single hook whose
outputs differs in shape, so a middleware reading state.outputs would first have
to know which hook it was in. The current step's output is not omitted from
after_step for lack of it; it is passed as result, and carrying the same value
down two paths is how the two drift apart.
Implementations MUST NOT insert the current step's output into state.outputs
before invoking after_step. Ordering the snapshot after the hook is what enforces
this, and it is what apcore-typescript and apcore-rust already do; apcore-python
snapshotted first and is corrected.
!!! warning "run_until is the deliberate exception — do not make it uniform"
PipelineState has a second consumer: the run_until predicate, which is
evaluated after a step completes and does see that step's output. That is
the point of the predicate — it decides whether to stop because of what the step
just produced, so hiding the value would make it useless.
So the snapshot belongs **between** the `after_step` hook and the `run_until`
predicate, not after both. The two consumers see deliberately different maps, and an
implementation that "cleans this up" into one ordering breaks whichever it moves.
apcore-python's `test_run_until_state_has_correct_outputs` pins the predicate's
view; the fixture cases here pin the hooks'.
A note on shape: `state.outputs` is a **live reference** to the engine's map in at
least apcore-python and apcore-typescript, not a copy. Anything that stores the
reference and reads it later sees the final map, not the map as it stood at the
hook. Read it inside the hook.
- Implementations MUST provide a
StepMiddlewareextension point with three callbacks:before_step,after_step, andon_step_error. Each callback MAY be omitted (default no-op). before_step(step_name, state)MUST be invoked before the step body executes. It is an observation hook: there is no step-input parameter to replace, so its return value carries no meaning. Input rewriting is the module-levelMiddleware.beforecontract, which runs once per call rather than once per step.after_step(step_name, state, result)MUST be invoked after the step body completes successfully, withresulta snapshot of the output the step produced.on_step_error(step_name, state, error)MUST be invoked when the step body raises. Returning a non-null/non-None/Some(...)value MUST be treated as recovery output. The error MUST NOT propagate further, the recovery value MUST become the step's output, and the pipeline MUST continue with the next step.- Returning null/None/
Nonefromon_step_errorMUST cause the original error to continue propagating (subject to the step'signore_errorssetting per §1.1 Fail-Fast Error Handling). after_stepMUST be invoked after a recovered step body as well as after a naturally successful one. A recovered step produced an output and the pipeline continued, so the onion MUST close: a middleware that acquired something inbefore_stepMUST get itsafter_step, or the recovery path leaks.- When multiple
StepMiddlewareinstances are registered for the same step,before_stepcallbacks MUST run in registration order, andafter_stepcallbacks MUST run in reverse registration order (onion model, identical to module-level middleware). on_step_errorcallbacks MUST run in reverse registration order over only the middlewares whosebefore_stephad executed before the failure. The first non-null recovery value short-circuits remaining handlers (first-recovery-wins).- Async
StepMiddlewarecallbacks MUST be supported in all SDKs. Detection is an SDK-local concern and implementations MUST NOT be judged on the mechanism: apcore-python gates oninspect.isawaitable()applied to the returned value rather thaninspect.iscoroutinefunction()on the callable, because the latter missesfunctools.partialand decorator wrappers (Issue #42); TypeScript awaits the return unconditionally; Rust usesasync_trait. See §1.5 Async Handler Detection.
before_step raising is categorically different from the step body raising, and the two MUST NOT share a recovery path.
- An error raised by
before_stepMUST be wrapped inMiddlewareChainError, identical to the module-level contract. - The step body MUST NOT execute.
on_step_errorMUST still be invoked, in reverse registration order, on the middlewares whosebefore_stephad already been entered — for observation and cleanup only. Any value it returns MUST be discarded: it MUST NOT become the step's output and it MUST NOT allow the pipeline to continue.- First-recovery-wins MUST NOT apply to this pass. Short-circuiting exists to stop shopping for a recovery once one is found; here no recovery is being sought, so every already-entered middleware MUST be notified. Stopping at the first middleware that happens to return a value would strand the cleanup of every middleware registered behind it — the opposite of what this pass is for.
after_stepMUST NOT be invoked for that step. No step body ran, so there is nothing to close over.- The step's
ignore_errorssetting MUST NOT apply.ignore_errorsdeclares that this step's failure is tolerable; a broken middleware chain is not a step failure.MiddlewareChainErrorMUST propagate regardless.
Why recovery is forbidden here. Honouring a recovery value would let the pipeline advance past a step whose body never ran. The built-in strategy places acl_check and approval_gate in that sequence, so a middleware that can make its own before_step raise and then return a value from on_step_error would skip the ACL check or the approval gate outright — a silent authorization bypass reachable from an extension point that is not supposed to carry authority. The onion is also torn at that moment: some middlewares have entered before_step and others have not, so no choice of after_step set preserves the enter/exit pairing.
!!! note "This is not the module-level contract, despite the shared vocabulary"
Module-level execute_on_error does honour a recovery value raised during the before phase. That is consistent, because a module-level recovery value terminates the call — it is the return value and nothing further executes. A step-level recovery value resumes a pipeline. The two operations share a name and are not the same thing, so the module-level precedent MUST NOT be transferred.
Pipeline configuration MUST fail fast on structural errors so that misconfiguration is caught at startup rather than at first request.
- Implementations MUST raise
ConfigurationErrorat YAML/config parse time when a key of thepipeline.configuremap references a step that does not exist in the active strategy. Implementations MUST NOT silently ignore the directive or log a warning and continue. - Implementations MUST raise
PipelineDependencyErrorat strategy construction time (before anycall()runs) when a step's declaredrequires:is not satisfied by an upstream step'sprovides:. The error message MUST include the unsatisfied capability name and the dependent step name. - Implementations MUST NOT defer dependency validation until first invocation. Strategy construction MUST be all-or-nothing: a strategy either validates cleanly and is callable, or construction fails with a typed error.
A step's requires: / provides: are declared by the step implementation, not by
configuration. pipeline.configure: accepts exactly the four behavioural modifiers
match_modules, ignore_errors, pure and timeout_ms
(schemas/apcore-config.schema.json $defs/ConfigurableStepFields,
spec/DECLARATIVE_CONFIG_SPEC.md §4.2), and implementations MUST reject any other key with
PIPELINE_CONFIGURATION_ERROR.
!!! warning "An earlier revision of this page showed requires: / provides: under configure:"
That example was wrong, and wrong in the direction that quietly defeats the rule above it.
The built-in `input_validation` step declares `requires=("module",)`, satisfied upstream by
`module_lookup`. Copying the example replaced it with `requires=("context",)` — deleting the
dependency, after which construction validates cleanly and the `PipelineDependencyError`
this section makes a MUST can never fire for that step. If a configuration file in your
deployment carries those keys, it is now a startup error; remove them, and declare the
contract on the step class instead.
=== "Python"
```python
from apcore.pipeline import BaseStep, PipelineContext, StepResult
class ValidateInputStep(BaseStep):
"""Declares its capability contract in code, where it belongs."""
def __init__(self) -> None:
super().__init__(
name="input_validation",
description="Validate the call inputs against the module input schema.",
requires=("module",),
provides=("validated_inputs",),
)
async def execute(self, ctx: PipelineContext) -> StepResult:
return StepResult(action="continue")
```
=== "TypeScript"
```typescript
import type { PipelineContext, Step, StepResult } from 'apcore-js';
/** Declares its capability contract in code, where it belongs. */
export class ValidateInputStep implements Step {
readonly name = 'input_validation';
readonly description = 'Validate the call inputs against the module input schema.';
readonly removable = true;
readonly replaceable = true;
readonly requires = ['module'] as const;
readonly provides = ['validated_inputs'] as const;
async execute(ctx: PipelineContext): Promise<StepResult> {
return { action: 'continue' };
}
}
```
=== "Rust"
```rust
use apcore::errors::ModuleError;
use apcore::pipeline::{PipelineContext, Step, StepResult};
/// Declares its capability contract in code, where it belongs.
pub struct ValidateInputStep;
impl Step for ValidateInputStep {
fn name(&self) -> &str {
"input_validation"
}
fn description(&self) -> &str {
"Validate the call inputs against the module input schema."
}
fn removable(&self) -> bool {
true
}
fn replaceable(&self) -> bool {
true
}
fn requires(&self) -> &[&str] {
&["module"]
}
fn provides(&self) -> &[&str] {
&["validated_inputs"]
}
async fn execute(&self, ctx: &mut PipelineContext) -> Result<StepResult, ModuleError> {
let _ = ctx;
Ok(StepResult::continue_step())
}
}
```
What a configuration file may say about that step:
# apcore.yaml — the four configurable fields, canonical snake_case spelling
pipeline:
configure:
input_validation:
ignore_errors: false
timeout_ms: 5000There is no pipeline.step_middleware: configuration section. An earlier
revision of this document showed one; schemas/apcore-config.schema.json
declares pipeline as additionalProperties: false with only remove,
configure and steps, no SDK ever parsed it, and no rule above required it.
Register step middleware programmatically on the ExecutionStrategy instead —
see the examples below.
A tracing-style StepMiddleware that logs the wall-clock duration of each step:
=== "Python" ```python import time from apcore import APCore, PipelineState, StepMiddleware, StepResult
class TimingStepMiddleware(StepMiddleware):
# All three hooks take the PipelineState view. There is no `inputs`
# parameter — a Step is `execute(ctx)` — so per-step state is kept on
# the middleware instance rather than threaded through the signature.
def __init__(self) -> None:
self._started: dict[str, float] = {}
async def before_step(self, step_name: str, state: PipelineState) -> None:
# Observation only: the engine discards whatever this returns.
self._started[step_name] = time.perf_counter()
async def after_step(self, step_name: str, state: PipelineState, result: StepResult) -> None:
start = self._started.pop(step_name, None)
if start is not None:
elapsed_ms = (time.perf_counter() - start) * 1000
print(f"step={step_name} elapsed_ms={elapsed_ms:.2f} action={result.action}")
async def on_step_error(self, step_name: str, state: PipelineState, error: Exception) -> None:
start = self._started.pop(step_name, None)
elapsed_ms = (time.perf_counter() - start) * 1000 if start is not None else 0.0
print(f"step={step_name} elapsed_ms={elapsed_ms:.2f} error={type(error).__name__}")
return None # do not recover; let the error propagate
client = APCore()
# Step middleware is registered on the execution strategy and runs for EVERY
# step; filter by `step_name` inside the hook rather than binding to one step.
client.executor.current_strategy.add_step_middleware(TimingStepMiddleware())
@client.module(id="demo.greet", description="Greet the user")
def greet(name: str) -> dict:
return {"message": f"Hello, {name}!"}
result = client.call("demo.greet", {"name": "World"})
```
=== "TypeScript" ```typescript import { APCore } from "apcore-js"; import type { PipelineState, StepMiddleware } from "apcore-js";
// StepMiddleware is an interface — implement it, do not extend it.
// Every hook takes (stepName, state, …). There is no `inputs` parameter —
// a Step is `execute(ctx)` — so per-step state lives on the instance.
class TimingStepMiddleware implements StepMiddleware {
private readonly started = new Map<string, number>();
async beforeStep(stepName: string, state: PipelineState): Promise<void> {
// Observation only: the engine ignores whatever this returns.
this.started.set(stepName, performance.now());
}
async afterStep(stepName: string, state: PipelineState, result: unknown): Promise<void> {
const start = this.started.get(stepName);
this.started.delete(stepName);
if (start !== undefined) {
const elapsedMs = performance.now() - start;
console.log(`step=${stepName} elapsed_ms=${elapsedMs.toFixed(2)}`);
}
}
async onStepError(
stepName: string,
state: PipelineState,
error: Error,
): Promise<unknown | null> {
const start = this.started.get(stepName);
this.started.delete(stepName);
const elapsedMs = start !== undefined ? performance.now() - start : 0;
console.log(`step=${stepName} elapsed_ms=${elapsedMs.toFixed(2)} error=${error.constructor.name}`);
return null; // do not recover; let the error propagate
}
}
const client = new APCore();
// NOTE: apcore-typescript registers step middleware on `PipelineEngine`,
// which the Executor holds privately — there is currently no public path to
// it from the client. Track this gap before relying on step middleware in
// TypeScript; Python and Rust expose it on the ExecutionStrategy.
client.module({
id: "demo.greet",
description: "Greet the user",
inputSchema: { type: "object", properties: { name: { type: "string" } } },
outputSchema: { type: "object", properties: { message: { type: "string" } } },
execute: ({ name }: { name: string }) => ({ message: `Hello, ${name}!` }),
});
const result = await client.call("demo.greet", { name: "World" });
```
=== "Rust" ```rust use apcore::{ModuleError, PipelineState, StepMiddleware}; use async_trait::async_trait; use serde_json::Value; use std::collections::HashMap; use std::sync::Mutex; use std::time::Instant;
// Every hook takes `&PipelineState<'_>`. There is no `inputs` parameter —
// a Step is `execute(ctx)` — so per-step state lives on the middleware,
// behind a Mutex because the trait takes `&self` and requires Send + Sync.
#[derive(Default)]
struct TimingStepMiddleware {
started: Mutex<HashMap<String, Instant>>,
}
#[async_trait]
impl StepMiddleware for TimingStepMiddleware {
async fn before_step(
&self,
step_name: &str,
_state: &PipelineState<'_>,
) -> Result<(), ModuleError> {
// Observation only: `before_step` returns no value the engine reads.
self.started
.lock()
.unwrap()
.insert(step_name.to_string(), Instant::now());
Ok(())
}
async fn after_step(
&self,
step_name: &str,
_state: &PipelineState<'_>,
_result: &Value,
) -> Result<(), ModuleError> {
if let Some(start) = self.started.lock().unwrap().remove(step_name) {
let elapsed_ms = start.elapsed().as_secs_f64() * 1000.0;
println!("step={step_name} elapsed_ms={elapsed_ms:.2}");
}
Ok(())
}
async fn on_step_error(
&self,
step_name: &str,
_state: &PipelineState<'_>,
error: &ModuleError,
) -> Result<Option<Value>, ModuleError> {
self.started.lock().unwrap().remove(step_name);
println!("step={} error={}", step_name, error.code);
Ok(None) // do not recover; let the error propagate
}
}
use apcore::{build_standard_strategy, Config, Executor, Registry};
use std::sync::Arc;
// `add_step_middleware` takes `&mut ExecutionStrategy`, and `Executor::strategy()`
// hands out only `&` — so build and populate the strategy BEFORE constructing
// the executor. Step middleware runs for every step; filter on `step_name`.
let mut strategy = build_standard_strategy();
strategy.add_step_middleware(Arc::new(TimingStepMiddleware::default()));
let executor = Executor::with_strategy(Registry::new(), Config::from_defaults(), strategy);
```
step_name(str/string/&str, required) — pipeline step name (e.g.,input_validation)state(PipelineState, required) — the step name, the outputs produced so far, and the pipeline context
There is no inputs parameter. A Step is execute(ctx); it reads what it needs off the context, so there is nothing for a middleware to be handed or to replace.
- Any error raised aborts the step body and triggers
on_step_errorcallbacks of already-executed step middlewares (mirrorsMiddlewareChainErrorfor the module-level chain)
- None/void.
before_stepis an observation hook: any value returned is discarded and MUST NOT change what the step body sees. Input rewriting is the module-levelMiddleware.beforecontract.
- async: language-dependent (Python sync or async; TypeScript and Rust MUST be async)
- thread_safe: true
- pure: false (may mutate the context reachable through
state)
step_name,state(same asbefore_step)result(StepResult/unknown/&Value, required) — snapshot of the output the step produced
- Behavior is SDK-defined (see Middleware.after for parity rule)
- None/void.
after_stepobserves; it does not replace the step output.
- async: language-dependent
- thread_safe: true
step_name,state(same asbefore_step)error(ModuleError, required) — the error raised by the step body
- on_step_error MUST NOT raise; exceptions inside the handler MUST be logged and iteration continues with the next handler
- On success with recovery: dict/object/Value — replacement output, short-circuits remaining handlers
- On pass-through: null/None/None — error continues propagating
- async: language-dependent
- thread_safe: true
The iscoroutinefunction-style detection in §1.5 is necessary but not sufficient. Higher-order wrappers like Python's functools.partial, JavaScript closures returned from factories, or class methods rebound onto instances are not literally async def / async function, yet they MAY return a coroutine / Promise when invoked. Function-shape inspection misses these cases and silently drops the awaited result.
To preserve correctness across all wrapper styles, middleware managers MUST detect awaitability on the return value of each before / after / on_error invocation, not on the function shape alone.
- Implementations MUST inspect each handler's RETURN value: if the returned object is awaitable (Python:
inspect.isawaitable(value)) or a thenable (TypeScript: object with a callable.thenmethod) or a future (Rust: aFutureresolved by the runtime), the middleware manager MUSTawaitit before proceeding to the next phase. - Implementations MUST NOT rely solely on
iscoroutinefunction/handler.constructor.name === 'AsyncFunction'as the gating check. These checks SHOULD remain as a fast-path optimization but MUST be supplemented by return-value detection. - The function-shape check from §1.5 is RETAINED as guidance for the warning case (e.g.,
async defdeclared but never awaited at the call site), but the authoritative decision MUST use the actual return value. - Synchronous middleware (return value is a plain
dict/null/()) MUST NOT be awaited; the manager MUST forward the value as-is.
import functools
async def _audit(module_id, inputs, ctx, *, source):
print(f"[{source}] {module_id}")
return None
# This is NOT a coroutine function — iscoroutinefunction returns False.
# But calling it returns a coroutine. Old detection silently swallows it.
audit = functools.partial(_audit, source="api")
client.use_before(audit)The same pattern occurs in TypeScript when a factory returns an arrow function whose body is async (the wrapper is sync, the body is async), or when a class method is wrapped in a decorator that re-binds this.
=== "Python" ```python import asyncio import functools import inspect from typing import Any, Callable
async def invoke_handler(handler: Callable[..., Any], *args: Any) -> Any:
# Fast path: known async function. Optimization, not the gate.
result = handler(*args)
# Authoritative check: did we get an awaitable back?
if inspect.isawaitable(result):
return await result
return result
# Works for: async def, functools.partial(async_fn, ...),
# decorated methods, lambda returning a coroutine, etc.
async def main():
async def audit(module_id, inputs, ctx, *, source):
return None
wrapped = functools.partial(audit, source="api")
await invoke_handler(wrapped, "math.add", {"a": 1}, None)
```
=== "TypeScript" ```typescript type Handler = (...args: unknown[]) => unknown;
function isThenable(v: unknown): v is PromiseLike<unknown> {
return (
typeof v === "object" &&
v !== null &&
typeof (v as { then?: unknown }).then === "function"
);
}
async function invokeHandler(handler: Handler, ...args: unknown[]): Promise<unknown> {
// Authoritative check: inspect the RETURN value, not handler.constructor.name.
const result = handler(...args);
if (isThenable(result)) {
return await result;
}
return result;
}
// Works for: async function, () => somePromise, partial(asyncFn, ...),
// decorated class methods rebound via .bind(this), etc.
const wrapped = (...args: unknown[]) => audit("api", ...args);
await invokeHandler(wrapped, "math.add", { a: 1 }, null);
```
=== "Rust"
```rust
// Rust handles this statically: every Middleware trait method returns
// impl Future via #[async_trait]. The compiler ENFORCES that callers
// .await the result; there is no runtime "shape" detection and no way
// to silently drop a Future. The async-correctness bug class is impossible.
//
// Higher-order wrappers (closures, partials, decorators) preserve the
// Future signature through the trait bound, so they remain awaitable
// by construction.
use async_trait::async_trait;
use apcore::middleware::Middleware;
use apcore::context::Context;
use apcore::errors::ModuleError;
use serde_json::Value;
struct Audit;
#[async_trait]
impl Middleware for Audit {
async fn before(
&self,
module_id: &str,
_inputs: &Value,
_ctx: &Context<Value>,
) -> Result<Option<Value>, ModuleError> {
println!("[audit] {module_id}");
Ok(None)
}
}
```
Implementations that previously gated awaiting on iscoroutinefunction / handler.constructor.name === 'AsyncFunction' MUST switch to return-value inspection. The fix is backward-compatible: synchronous handlers that return non-awaitable values are unaffected; awaitable returns from non-async-declared functions are now correctly awaited instead of leaked.
The middleware registration API accepts duplicate registrations silently. Two instances of the same middleware class — for example, two RetryMiddleware instances registered by different components — both fire in sequence, producing surprising compound behavior. A user expecting "retry up to 3 times" can end up with "retry up to 9 times" because two layers each multiply the attempts.
The most common collision pattern:
- An application uses a framework integration (e.g.,
django-apcore) that auto-registers resilience middleware at startup. - The application also explicitly registers its own resilience middleware.
- Neither side knows about the other; both fire on every call.
Diagnosing this today requires runtime tracing. There is no startup-time signal that something is doubled up.
Detection (SHOULD). When a middleware is registered, SDKs SHOULD detect prior registrations that share the same identity and emit a warning. Identity is computed as follows:
| Language | Default identity |
|---|---|
| Python | f"{type(mw).__module__}.{type(mw).__qualname__}" |
| TypeScript | `${moduleSpecifier}:${ClassName}` when the module specifier is statically recoverable, falling back to the constructor name only |
| Rust | std::any::type_name::<T>() |
A middleware MAY override the default identity by providing an explicit identity_key (string) at registration time. This is useful when the same class is intentionally used with different configurations (e.g., one RetryMiddleware for HTTP modules and another for database modules — both legitimate, but they share a class).
Warning content (MUST). When a duplicate is detected and no opt-out is set, the SDK MUST emit a WARNING-level log entry that includes:
- The identity string of the duplicate.
- The registration site of the first instance (caller frame, file:line, or stack info if available at acceptable cost).
- The registration site of the duplicate.
The warning MUST be non-blocking: the registration itself MUST succeed. Detection is observability, not enforcement.
Order preservation (MUST). Registration order MUST be preserved. SDKs MUST NOT dedup, reorder, or otherwise mutate the middleware chain in response to a duplicate detection. The actual chain runs both instances in registration order.
Opt-out (SHOULD). SDKs SHOULD provide a per-registration flag to suppress the warning when stacking is intentional:
| Language | Flag |
|---|---|
| Python | register_middleware(mw, allow_duplicate=True) (or equivalent on client.use) |
| TypeScript | client.use(mw, { allowDuplicate: true }) |
| Rust | builder: .allow_duplicate(true) |
Identity-key namespace (SHOULD). When using identity_key, third parties SHOULD prefix with their vendor namespace (myapp.retry.http, my-vendor.observability.tracing, etc.). Keys starting with apcore. are reserved for framework-provided middleware.
=== "Python"
```python
from apcore import APCore
from apcore.middleware import RetryMiddleware
client = APCore()
# First registration — no warning.
client.use(RetryMiddleware(max_attempts=3))
# Second registration — emits WARNING naming both call sites.
client.use(RetryMiddleware(max_attempts=2))
# Intentional stacking — pass allow_duplicate=True to silence.
client.use(RetryMiddleware(max_attempts=5), allow_duplicate=True)
# Two instances of the same class with distinct identity_key — NOT a duplicate.
client.use(RetryMiddleware(max_attempts=3), identity_key="myapp.retry.http")
client.use(RetryMiddleware(max_attempts=2), identity_key="myapp.retry.db")
```
=== "TypeScript"
```typescript
import { APCore, RetryMiddleware } from "apcore-js";
const client = new APCore();
// First registration — no warning.
client.use(new RetryMiddleware({ maxAttempts: 3 }));
// Second registration — emits WARNING naming both call sites.
client.use(new RetryMiddleware({ maxAttempts: 2 }));
// Intentional stacking — pass allowDuplicate.
client.use(new RetryMiddleware({ maxAttempts: 5 }), { allowDuplicate: true });
// Distinct identity_key — NOT a duplicate.
client.use(new RetryMiddleware({ maxAttempts: 3 }), { identityKey: "myapp.retry.http" });
client.use(new RetryMiddleware({ maxAttempts: 2 }), { identityKey: "myapp.retry.db" });
```
=== "Rust"
```rust
use apcore::middleware::{RetryMiddleware, MiddlewareRegistration};
use apcore::APCore;
let client = APCore::new();
// First registration — no warning.
client.use_middleware(RetryMiddleware::new(3));
// Second registration — emits WARNING naming both call sites.
client.use_middleware(RetryMiddleware::new(2));
// Intentional stacking.
client.use_middleware(
MiddlewareRegistration::new(RetryMiddleware::new(5))
.allow_duplicate(true),
);
// Distinct identity_key — NOT a duplicate.
client.use_middleware(
MiddlewareRegistration::new(RetryMiddleware::new(3))
.identity_key("myapp.retry.http"),
);
client.use_middleware(
MiddlewareRegistration::new(RetryMiddleware::new(2))
.identity_key("myapp.retry.db"),
);
```
!!! info "What this rule does NOT catch" Detection of behaviorally overlapping middleware that do not share class identity (e.g., two independently-implemented retry libraries with different class names but equivalent intent) is not a problem the framework can solve generically. Reviewers and integration tests remain the safety net for that class of collision.
A stricter "reject duplicates outright" mode is not part of this requirement. SDKs MAY add an optional mode in a future release; this section reserves the design space without mandating it.