[vdusek]

Rebasing v2 onto master combined v2's changes with master's docs restructure (#2197). Four references ended up pointing at pages or ids that no longer exist, and the Docusaurus build fails on them:

• website/sidebars.js lists concepts/storage-clients, which refactor(storages)!: rename storage clients to storage backends #2362 renamed to storage-backends. The build stops on the invalid sidebar id.
• The Events concept page links enum/Event, but Event is a StrEnum in v2 (chore!: drop Python 3.10 support #2295), so its API page is class/Event.
• The v1 upgrading guide links ../concepts/storage-clients.
• The v2 upgrading guide links ../guides/proxy-management, ../guides/scaling-crawlers and ../guides/request-loaders, which now live under ../concepts/. The anchors they point at exist on the concept pages.
• The Events and Configuration concept pages say that Snapshotter drives autoscaling and link its API page. In v2, Snapshotter is private and has no API page. The CPU and memory load signals listen to the system info events, and the crawler builds its default ConcurrencySystem from its configuration. The pages now say that and link those classes. The site build doesn't check API links, so it didn't flag these.

PR CI doesn't build the site, so only the docs release would catch these. With this change, pnpm build passes locally. The remaining broken-anchor warnings come from the frozen 0.6 API reference and from a Request#user_data link that master has too.

This should be merged before the logging stack (#2402–#2404). The CI part of the rebase fallout is in #2409.

✍️ Drafted by Claude Code

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (v2@f46a104). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##             v2    #2408   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage      ?   94.60%           
=====================================
  Files         ?      194           
  Lines         ?    14151           
  Branches      ?        0           
=====================================
  Hits          ?    13388           
  Misses        ?      763           
  Partials      ?        0           

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	77.34% <ø> (?)
unit	87.54% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.