Skip to content

Leave basecamp-sdk bumps to coworker's sdk-bump - #971

Closed
jeremy wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot-ignore-sdk
Closed

jeremy wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot-ignore-sdk

Conversation

@jeremy

@jeremy jeremy commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What

Dependabot stops opening version updates for github.com/basecamp/basecamp-sdk/go. SDK bumps will come from coworker's sdk-bump (basecamp/coworker#281). On the day a release is published it opens one PR here that bumps the module, refreshes the Nix vendorHash and sdk-provenance.json, and runs go build and go vet. It opens even when the bump doesn't compile, with the errors in the body. It closes Dependabot's older SDK bumps in favour of its own.

Why

Dependabot's grouped Go bump has carried the SDK until now. Every 0.x minor breaks the API, so that bump came days late and failed to compile: #911 opened four days after v0.25.0 and is still open.

Security updates for the SDK keep coming. An ignore with no versions blocks version updates only: for security updates Dependabot applies just the explicit versions (dependabot-core: return versions if security_updates_only).

Merge order: sdk-bump's schedule entry is still disabled. Merge this when it gets turned on. Merged before then, nothing bumps the SDK here except a person.

Testing

  • The YAML parses, and the gomod entry carries the one ignore.
  • Only .github/dependabot.yml changes.

Summary by cubic

Adds a Dependabot ignore for github.com/basecamp/basecamp-sdk/go so SDK version bumps come from coworker's sdk-bump instead of Dependabot's grouped bump, which arrived days late and didn't compile since each 0.x minor breaks the API. Security updates still arrive: Dependabot applies only an ignore's explicit versions to those.

Merge this only after sdk-bump's schedule entry is enabled, otherwise nobody bumps the SDK here except a person.

Written for commit 8fdb71e. Summary will update on new commits.

View guided diff Turn on auto-fix

Dependabot ignores github.com/basecamp/basecamp-sdk/go for version
updates; security updates still come, since they honour only an
ignore's explicit versions.
@jeremy
jeremy requested a review from a team as a code owner October 27, 2026 16:13
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 27, 2026 16:13

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the ci CI/CD workflows label Oct 27, 2026
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-27T16:14:57.832614Z 8fdb71e PR opened
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-27T16:15:52.051188Z 8fdb71e PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@jeremy

jeremy commented Oct 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Closing. Rob answered on the pipeline card: Dependabot stays the main path for SDK bumps, and sdk-bump (basecamp/coworker#281) becomes the backstop. It opens its own PR only when Dependabot's is missing after a grace period or fails to build. So no ignore is needed here.

@jeremy jeremy closed this Oct 27, 2026
@jeremy
jeremy deleted the dependabot-ignore-sdk branch October 27, 2026 16:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci CI/CD workflows

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants