diff --git a/_sidebar.md b/_sidebar.md
index 17acc05..1f33be6 100644
--- a/_sidebar.md
+++ b/_sidebar.md
@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@
     * [Architecture](backend/redis/architecture.md)
     * [Security best practices](backend/redis/security-best-practices.md)
 * **Docs**
+  * [Ai agent context boundary contracts](docs/ai-agent-context-boundary-contracts.md)
   * [Ai agent context injection pipelines](docs/ai-agent-context-injection-pipelines.md)
   * [Ai agent context pruning](docs/ai-agent-context-pruning.md)
   * [Ai agent dynamic context pruning](docs/ai-agent-dynamic-context-pruning.md)
diff --git a/docs/ai-agent-context-boundary-contracts.md b/docs/ai-agent-context-boundary-contracts.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..288ef8b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/ai-agent-context-boundary-contracts.md
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+---
+technology: AI Agents
+domain: Architecture
+level: Senior/Architect
+version: 2026.1.0
+tags: [ai-agent, context-boundary, vibe-coding, orchestration, deterministic-patterns]
+ai_role: Architectural Strategist
+last_updated: 2026-10-15
+---
+
+> 📦 [best-practise](../README.md) / 📄 [docs](./)
+
+# 🤖 AI Agent Orchestration: Context Boundary Contracts
+
+In 2026, **Vibe Coding** requires enforcing strict boundaries around the context provided to multi-agent orchestrations. This document outlines the mandatory Context Boundary Contracts required to guarantee deterministic, hallucination-free generation by limiting agent awareness strictly to their required dependencies.
+
+---
+
+## 🏗️ Architectural Foundations
+
+> [!IMPORTANT]
+> Context boundaries MUST be enforced at the orchestration level. Permitting an agent to access unbounded context inevitably results in catastrophic O(n) latency degradation and hallucination scaling.
+
+### ❌ Bad Practice
+
+```typescript
+// Injecting unrestricted context across the entire repository
+async function initializeAgent(task: string) {
+    const globalContext: any = await fileSystem.readAllFiles('./src'); // Unbounded injection
+    return await LLM.execute(task, globalContext);
+}
+```
+
+### ⚠️ Problem
+
+Injecting the complete repository state into an AI Agent's memory window creates massive token waste and dilutes focus. The usage of `any` disables static typing verification, creating severe hallucinations where agents mix concepts from disconnected modules.
+
+### ✅ Best Practice
+
+```typescript
+import { z } from 'zod';
+import { ContextRouter } from '@vibe-coding/router';
+
+const BoundarySchema = z.object({
+    targetModule: z.string(),
+    allowedDependencies: z.array(z.string()).max(5),
+});
+
+async function initializeAgent(task: string, request: unknown): Promise<void> {
+    const boundary = BoundarySchema.parse(request);
+    // O(1) resolution of specific domain context
+    const scopedContext = await ContextRouter.resolve(boundary.targetModule, boundary.allowedDependencies);
+
+    await LLM.execute(task, scopedContext, { strict: true });
+}
+```
+
+### 🚀 Solution
+
+By enforcing a strict Zod schema for context retrieval and typing the input as `unknown`, we establish an impenetrable Context Boundary Contract. The agent receives only the exact module dependencies, making execution deterministic, O(1) in retrieval latency, and securely bounded against prompt injection.
+
+---
+
+## 🔄 State-Space Boundary Flow
+
+```mermaid
+stateDiagram-v2
+    direction LR
+    [*] --> TaskInitiated
+    TaskInitiated --> ContextResolution : Extract Dependencies
+    ContextResolution --> BoundedExecution : Hydrate Specific Context
+    BoundedExecution --> OutputValidation : Strict Output Constraint
+    OutputValidation --> [*] : Success
+
+    classDef component fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50,stroke-width:2px,color:#000;
+    classDef default fill:#e1f5fe,stroke:#03a9f4,stroke-width:2px,color:#000;
+```
+
+> [!NOTE]
+> Context boundaries are MANDATORY to achieve a 95%+ Fidelity Score in autonomous orchestration.