docs(arch): autonomous evolution of architecture blueprints

architectures/agentic-architecture/readme.md

@@ -22,6 +22,13 @@ last_updated: 2026-04-17
 </div>
 
 ---
+
+## 🧱 Core Principles
+
+1. **Isolation & Testability:** Specialized agents can be tested and tuned in isolation from the orchestrator.
+2. **Strict Boundaries:** Enforce rigid responsibilities between planners, coders, and reviewers.
+3. **Decoupling:** Decouple context gathering from action execution to optimize token usage.
+
 ## 🗺️ Map of Patterns (Agentic Modules)
 
 This architecture defines the operational boundaries for multi-agent workflows, specifically optimizing for context windows, token efficiency, and deterministic output.
@@ -31,6 +38,8 @@ This architecture defines the operational boundaries for multi-agent workflows,
 - ⚖️ **Trade-offs:** Latency vs. Reasoning depth.
 - 🛠️ **Implementation Guide:** Rules for defining strict agent personas and constraints.
 
+## 📐 Architecture Diagram
+
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
     User[User Request] --> Orchestrator[Orchestrator Agent]

architectures/backend-for-frontend/readme.md

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ last_updated: 2026-03-29
 
 This engineering directive defines the **best practices** for the Backend-For-Frontend (BFF) architecture. This document is designed to ensure maximum scalability, security, and code quality when developing applications that require tailored APIs for different clients (e.g., web, mobile).
 
-# Context & Scope
+## 🎯 Context & Scope
 - **Primary Goal:** Provide strict architectural rules and practical patterns for creating specialized backend services dedicated to specific frontend applications.
 - **Description:** A pattern where a separate backend service is created for each specific frontend application or interface type, rather than having a single general-purpose API backend for all clients.
 
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ This engineering directive defines the **best practices** for the Backend-For-Fr
 | **Complexity** | Multiple BFFs to manage | Single point of failure/bottleneck |
 
 
+## 📐 Architecture Diagram
+
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
     Web[Web Client] --> BFF_Web[BFF Web]

architectures/feature-sliced-design/readme.md

@@ -13,12 +13,33 @@ last_updated: 2026-03-22
   <img src="https://feature-sliced.design/img/brand/logo-primary.png" width="100" alt="FSD Logo">
 
   # 🍰 Feature-Sliced Design (FSD)
+
 </div>
+
 ---
 
+## 🎯 Context & Scope
+- **Primary Goal:** Establish definitive rules and best practices for modular, scalable frontend development.
+- **Target Tooling:** AI Agents and Human Developers.
+- **Tech Stack Version:** Agnostic (React, Vue, Angular)
+
+---
 This engineering directive contains strict architectural guidelines and 20 practical patterns for using the Feature-Sliced Design methodology to build scalable and deterministic Frontend applications.
 
 
+
+## 🗺️ Map of Patterns
+- 🌊 **Data Flow:** Layer-to-layer execution paths and slice interactions.
+- 📁 **Folder Structure:** Strict vertical (slices) and horizontal (layers) isolation.
+- ⚖️ **Trade-offs:** Initial overhead vs. long-term maintainability.
+- 🛠️ **Implementation Guide:** Rules for cross-imports and boundaries.
+
+## 🧱 Core Principles
+
+1. **Isolation & Testability:** Slices are completely isolated, making them highly testable and refactorable.
+2. **Strict Boundaries:** Enforce strict cross-import boundaries (lower layers cannot import from higher layers).
+3. **Decoupling:** Decouple business logic into cohesive modules rather than scattering it across technical layers.
+
 ### Structural Comparison: Feature-Sliced Design vs Clean Architecture
 
 | Feature | Feature-Sliced Design (FSD) | Clean Architecture |
@@ -28,7 +49,7 @@ This engineering directive contains strict architectural guidelines and 20 pract
 | **Learning Curve** | High (Strict structural rules) | High (Abstract concepts) |
 | **Scalability** | Excellent for large frontend teams | Excellent for complex enterprise backends |
 
-## Architecture Diagram
+## 📐 Architecture Diagram
 
 ```mermaid
 graph TD

architectures/hexagonal-architecture/readme.md

@@ -20,6 +20,13 @@ last_updated: 2026-03-22
   **Ports and Adapters for scalable, testable code.**
 </div>
 ---
+
+## 🧱 Core Principles
+
+1. **Isolation & Testability:** The Domain is strictly isolated from infrastructure, allowing unit testing via Ports.
+2. **Strict Boundaries:** Enforce rigid boundaries using Ports and Adapters to separate business logic from technical details.
+3. **Decoupling:** Decouple the Core logic from databases, external APIs, and UIs.
+
 ## 🗺️ Map of Patterns (Hexagonal Modules)
 
 This pattern documentation has been decomposed into specialized modules for zero-approval AI parsing and human comprehension.
@@ -29,6 +36,8 @@ This pattern documentation has been decomposed into specialized modules for zero
 - ⚖️ **[Trade-offs](./trade-offs.md):** Pros, cons, and architectural constraints.
 - 🛠️ **[Implementation Guide](./implementation-guide.md):** Step-by-step rules and code constraints for Vibe Coding.
 
+## 📐 Architecture Diagram
+
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
     A[External System/User] -->|Calls Port| B(Adapter)

architectures/microkernel-architecture/readme.md

@@ -24,6 +24,13 @@ last_updated: 2026-04-18
 </div>
 
 ---
+
+## 🧱 Core Principles
+
+1. **Isolation & Testability:** Plugins can be tested in complete isolation from the core.
+2. **Strict Boundaries:** Enforce rigid structural barriers between the core microkernel and plugins.
+3. **Decoupling:** Decouple volatile domain logic from the stable core application logic.
+
 ## 🗺️ Map of Patterns (Microkernel Modules)
 
 This architecture defines strict boundaries between a minimal core system and extended functionalities implemented as standalone plugins. It guarantees O(1) impact on the core when adding or modifying auxiliary features.
@@ -33,6 +40,8 @@ This architecture defines strict boundaries between a minimal core system and ex
 - ⚖️ **Trade-offs:** Extensibility vs. Contract Management complexity.
 - 🛠️ **Implementation Guide:** Rules for defining strict interface boundaries and registry mechanisms.
 
+## 📐 Architecture Diagram
+
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
     Core[Core System / Microkernel] --> Registry[Plugin Registry]

architectures/microservices/readme.md

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ last_updated: 2026-03-29
 ---
 
 This engineering directive defines the **best practices** for the Microservices architecture. This document is designed to ensure maximum scalability, security, and code quality when developing enterprise-level applications.
-# Context & Scope
+## 🎯 Context & Scope
 - **Primary Goal:** Provide strict architectural rules and practical patterns for creating scalable systems.
 - **Description:** Breaking down a giant monolithic system into small, independent pieces, each handling its own business capability. Each service has its own Database.
 ## Map of Patterns
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ This engineering directive defines the **best practices** for the Microservices
 2. **Strict Boundaries:** Enforce rigid structural barriers between business logic and infrastructure.
 3. **Decoupling:** Decouple how data is stored from how it is queried and displayed.
 
+## 📐 Architecture Diagram
+
 ```mermaid
 graph LR
     Isolation[Isolation & Testability] --- Boundaries[Strict Boundaries]

architectures/model-view-controller/readme.md

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ last_updated: 2026-03-22
 ---
 
 This engineering directive defines the **best practices** for the MVC architecture. This document is designed to ensure maximum scalability, security, and code quality when developing enterprise-level applications.
-# Context & Scope
+## 🎯 Context & Scope
 - **Primary Goal:** Provide strict architectural rules and 20 practical patterns for creating scalable and deterministic MVC applications.
 - **Target Tooling:** AI Agents (Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, Antigravity) and Senior Developers.
 - **Tech Stack Version:** Agnostic (Applicable to Node.js, NestJS, Express, Spring Boot, Django, ASP.NET, etc.).
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ This engineering directive defines the **best practices** for the MVC architectu
 > **Architectural Contract:** The Controller receives the HTTP request and routes commands, Services (or Domain Model) contain the business logic, and the View is strictly responsible for rendering abstract Data Transfer Objects (DTOs).
 ## Architecture Flow (Mental Model)
 
+## 📐 Architecture Diagram
+
 ```mermaid
 graph TD
     User([User Request]) --> Router[Router]
@@ -59,6 +61,13 @@ graph TD
 - 📁 [**Folder Structure:** Layering logic](./folder-structure.md)
 - ⚖️ [**Trade-offs:** Pros, Cons, and System Constraints](./trade-offs.md)
 - 🛠️ [**Implementation Guide:** Code patterns and Anti-patterns](./implementation-guide.md)
+
+## 🧱 Core Principles
+
+1. **Isolation & Testability:** Views and Models are isolated from each other via Controllers.
+2. **Strict Boundaries:** Enforce rigid structural boundaries between UI, logic, and data.
+3. **Decoupling:** Decouple the UI from business logic to enable independent development.
+
 ## 1. Fat Controllers (God Object Controller)
 
 ### ❌ Bad Practice