Skip to content

RIG field not in schema: association_categories #54

Description

@kevinschaper

The semmeddb RIG uses an association_categories field on an edge type that isn't in the schema.

Used by: semmeddb (1 RIG)

Example (semmeddb_rig.yaml):

association_categories:
  - biolink:Association
  - biolink:CausalGeneToDiseaseAssociation
  - biolink:GeneToPhenotypicFeatureAssociation
  - biolink:ChemicalAffectsGeneAssociation
  - biolink:GeneAffectsChemicalAssociation

Shape: a multivalued list of Biolink Association subclasses on an EdgeType, recording the association categories the edges reify to.

Decision: add an association_categories slot to EdgeType, or is this redundant with the subject/predicate/object specification? Worth a modeling discussion.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions