Replies: 4 comments 2 replies
|
It makes no sense to tune the borg chunker which uses a hash to determine individual chunk sizes that way Unless there was a custom chunker which is aware of the exact format boundaries its likely not to be a good match |
|
borg 1.2 has a
So guess this is too simple for VMA and it would require a very special custom chunker, as @RonnyPfannschmidt said. |
|
Another problem with the VMA backup is, that all data blocks can be stored out-of-order, varying between backup runs (so in a first backup blocks could be stored in the order 4,1,3,2 and in a second run they could be stored in the order 3,1,2,4). Would it even be possible to write a custom chunker to reorder the contained data blocks? |
|
Closing this as outdated: it has seen no activity for a long time and predates the current borg releases. If this still affects you on a current version - borg 1.4.x (stable) or the borg 2.0.0 beta - please open a new discussion with up-to-date details. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hello,
I'm asking for help figuring out what would be the optimal chunker parameters for dedup'ing asynchronously written Proxmox VMA images.
The VMA format is described here: https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-qemu.git;a=blob;f=vma_spec.txt
According to them, they use 65k cluster size with a maximum of 4M extent size, also adding a 512b header at the beginning of each extent.
Does this mean I'd need these for successful deduplication?
All reactions