Skip to content

Proposal for extending Pset_DoorCommon with a property HasHoldOpenDevice #1167

Description

@Wilt

Pset_DoorCommon has no property to indicate whether a door is fitted with a hold-open/release device (e.g. an electromagnetic door holder tied into the fire alarm system). This is common, code-referenced door hardware — comparable in nature to SelfClosing and HasDrive, which already exist in this Pset — but there is currently no standard way to flag it.

Background / problem

Fire and smoke doors are frequently held open in daily use by an electromagnetic (or similar) hold-open device, which releases the door on a signal from the fire alarm system so it can self-close. This is standard, code-referenced practice internationally:

  • UK: covered under BS 7273-4 ("door holders")

  • EU: devices covered by EN 1155 (controlled door closing devices with hold-open function)

  • US: "electromagnetic door holders", referenced in NFPA 72 / IFC (International Fire Code) 703.2.2

  • Germany: "Feststellanlage"

  • Sweden: "magnetuppställning"
    This is functionally analogous to two properties already present in Pset_DoorCommon:

  • SelfClosing (IfcBoolean) — indicates the door closes automatically

  • HasDrive (IfcBoolean) — indicates the door has an automatic drive/actuator
    Both of these describe door-level behavior driven by attached hardware that could equally be modeled as a separate object (a closer, a motor/actuator) — so there's clear precedent for a simple boolean flag living on the door itself rather than requiring a separate linked element. A hold-open/release device fits the same pattern and is currently the gap.

Proposal

Add a new property to Pset_DoorCommon, applicable to IfcDoor and IfcDoorType:

Name Property Type Data Type Description
HasHoldOpenDevice IfcPropertySingleValue IfcBoolean Indication of whether this object is fitted with a hold-open device that keeps the door open during normal use and releases it automatically (e.g. on activation of the fire alarm system) to allow it to close (TRUE), or not (FALSE).

Happy to help draft the change and provide a pull-request in the repo if maintainers are open to this addition.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions