Skip to content
View burkepcb's full-sized avatar
  • South Australia

Highlights

  • Pro

Block or report burkepcb

Block user

Prevent this user from interacting with your repositories and sending you notifications. Learn more about blocking users.

You must be logged in to block users.

Content in all repositories owned by your account will be closed.
Maximum 250 characters. Please don’t include any personal information such as legal names or email addresses. Markdown is supported. This note will only be visible to you.
Report abuse

Contact GitHub support about this user’s behavior. Learn more about reporting abuse.

Report abuse
burkepcb/README.md

Paul Burke — South Australia

I work on evidence-first approaches to cyber assurance and governed AI-assisted delivery.

The common pattern is simple: define the claim, establish what evidence should support it, verify the parts that can be checked deterministically, and keep consequential decisions explicit.

Control Assurance Case Study
A synthetic GRC case study showing how supplied evidence can be organised against controls and checked for missing, stale, scope-mismatched or unsupported material before assurance review.

Governed AI Delivery Exemplar
A runnable Python exemplar showing bounded AI-assisted work, explicit authority, deterministic verification, integrity evidence and an explicit approval boundary.

Both projects demonstrate the same underlying principle: evidence should support a consequential claim before that claim is accepted.

Pinned Loading

  1. control-assurance-case-study control-assurance-case-study Public

    A synthetic case study showing how supplied GRC evidence can be organised and checked against controls before a human reviewer makes the assurance decision.

  2. governed-ai-delivery-exemplar governed-ai-delivery-exemplar Public

    A small public exemplar of governed AI-assisted delivery: bounded work, explicit authority, deterministic verification, evidence, and human decision.

    Python