Skip to content

Commit b8f428e

Browse files
committed
Require direct evidence in summary concern fixtures
1 parent 66ac3b3 commit b8f428e

1 file changed

Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions

File tree

‎AGENTS.md‎

Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -45,5 +45,6 @@ Every reproduced race requires a failing-before and passing-after regression. As
4545
- Report current test counts separately from historical milestone counts.
4646
- Before requesting automated review, report the current head, CI state, mergeability, unresolved threads, and deferred follow-up issues.
4747
- Reproduce summary-only review concerns or turn them into a concrete follow-up issue. Do not repeatedly patch vague wording without a failure case.
48+
- A validation fixture for a summary-only concern must assert the disputed intermediate representation or state before using a downstream outcome as evidence that the concern was exercised.
4849
- For each review round, record what changed, what was declined and why, and the regression evidence. Re-request review until a round returns no new findings.
4950
- Treat review-lesson extraction as a merge gate. Before invoking merge, classify every review finding in the PR body as: covered by an existing rule (cite it), captured by a new rule in this branch (cite it), or one-off (record why). Do not merge until this audit is complete and every required `AGENTS.md` update is included in the reviewed head. Omit rules that merely repeat existing guidance.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)