doi: concept-DOI Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.20822121) no paper e CITATION.cff

DOI mintado pela release v1.0.0 (version 10.5281/zenodo.20822122). O paper cita o
concept-DOI (todas as versões). Registro com ORCID e Apache-2.0 corretos.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Author: valvesss

CITATION.cff

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ authors:
     orcid: "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3522-1694"
 repository-code: "https://github.com/cold-code-labs/skew-dynamic"
 url: "https://skew-dynamic.coldcodelabs.com"
-# doi: "10.5281/zenodo.XXXXXXX"  # minted by Zenodo on the first GitHub release
+doi: "10.5281/zenodo.20822121"  # concept DOI (all versions) — minted by Zenodo
 abstract: >-
   An open empirical study by Cold Code Labs showing that the skewness of returns
   implied by football betting markets is a structural invariant: ~100% the

study/docs/paper/draft.md

@@ -644,7 +644,8 @@ statistic in this article are openly available: the per-league and per-season
 aggregate tables (`study/outputs/*.csv`), the consolidated results artifact
 (`site/src/data/findings.json`), and the figures, all with a data dictionary
 (`study/outputs/README.md`). These are archived at Zenodo
-(doi:10.5281/zenodo.XXXXXXX — minted on acceptance) and version-controlled at the
+(doi:10.5281/zenodo.20822121 — concept DOI, resolving to the latest version) and
+version-controlled at the
 repository below. The underlying raw match-and-odds file is sourced from
 football-data.co.uk; its terms of use restrict redistribution, so it is **not**
 deposited. It is regenerated deterministically by `analysis/00_fetch_data.py`,