1010 rel ="stylesheet "
1111 />
1212 < title > Is Europe Falling Behind?</ title >
13- < script type ="module " crossorigin src ="/special-operations/assets/index-DaC9dkmI .js "> </ script >
14- < link rel ="stylesheet " crossorigin href ="/special-operations/assets/index-BheuV3h4 .css ">
13+ < script type ="module " crossorigin src ="/special-operations/assets/index-CwahgbZA .js "> </ script >
14+ < link rel ="stylesheet " crossorigin href ="/special-operations/assets/index-Do4rh7yP .css ">
1515 </ head >
1616 < body >
1717 < div id ="app ">
@@ -21,13 +21,172 @@ <h1>
2121 Is Europe < em > really</ em > falling behind?
2222 </ h1 >
2323 < p class ="lede ">
24- Choose an economic indicator, animate it through time, and compare a
25- handful of countries across the metrics that matter.
24+ Not in the simple way the headline suggests. Since 2000, European
25+ economies kept growing, but public markets compounded much more
26+ aggressively in the United States and selected Asian markets.
27+ </ p >
28+ < p class ="story-cue ">
29+ Read the charts from left to right: first the real economy, then the
30+ investable market proxy, then the global index weight that investors
31+ actually experience.
2632 </ p >
2733 </ header >
2834
35+ < section class ="findings-panel " aria-labelledby ="findings-title ">
36+ < div class ="section-kicker ">
37+ < p class ="eyebrow "> Key findings</ p >
38+ < h2 id ="findings-title "> Europe grew. Markets repriced the world elsewhere.</ h2 >
39+ </ div >
40+ < div class ="finding-grid ">
41+ < article class ="finding-card ">
42+ < span class ="finding-card__label "> Real economy</ span >
43+ < strong > 2.48x</ strong >
44+ < p > Average European GDP growth by 2023, with GDP per capita also more than doubling.</ p >
45+ </ article >
46+ < article class ="finding-card ">
47+ < span class ="finding-card__label "> Market proxy</ span >
48+ < strong > 1.15x</ strong >
49+ < p > Average European country-ETF growth, versus 2.28x for North America.</ p >
50+ </ article >
51+ < article class ="finding-card ">
52+ < span class ="finding-card__label "> Clearest split</ span >
53+ < strong > 0.90x vs 2.51x</ strong >
54+ < p > Germany's ETF ended below its 2000 level, while the US ETF more than doubled.</ p >
55+ </ article >
56+ < article class ="finding-card ">
57+ < span class ="finding-card__label "> Global weight</ span >
58+ < strong > 63.7%</ strong >
59+ < p > The US share of MSCI ACWI in May 2026, up from 53.0% in April 2015.</ p >
60+ </ article >
61+ </ div >
62+ </ section >
63+
2964 < main class ="mvp-layout ">
30- < section class ="map-panel " aria-label ="Interactive map ">
65+ < section class ="guided-story " aria-label ="Guided data story ">
66+ < div class ="story-scroll ">
67+ < div class ="scroll-hint " aria-hidden ="true ">
68+ < span > Scroll</ span >
69+ < i class ="scroll-hint__arrow "> </ i >
70+ </ div >
71+
72+ < article class ="story-step " data-story-preset ="real-economy ">
73+ < p class ="eyebrow "> Act 1 · Real economy</ p >
74+ < h2 > Europe did not stop growing.</ h2 >
75+ < p >
76+ Start with GDP in regional mode. By 2023, Europe is around
77+ 2.48x its 2000 GDP baseline, and GDP per capita also more than
78+ doubled. The first lesson is that the story is not collapse.
79+ </ p >
80+ < div class ="story-stat-row ">
81+ < span > < strong > 2.48x</ strong > Europe GDP</ span >
82+ < span > < strong > 2.18x</ strong > Europe GDP per capita</ span >
83+ </ div >
84+ < button class ="story-preset-button " type ="button " data-story-action ="real-economy ">
85+ Show GDP view
86+ </ button >
87+ </ article >
88+
89+ < article class ="story-step " data-story-preset ="market-gap ">
90+ < p class ="eyebrow "> Act 2 · Market proxy</ p >
91+ < h2 > The market line tells a harsher story.</ h2 >
92+ < p >
93+ Switch to country ETF prices and the gap opens. Germany and the
94+ UK sit below their 2000 ETF baselines, while the US ETF more
95+ than doubles and Korea becomes the key counterexample.
96+ </ p >
97+ < div class ="story-stat-row ">
98+ < span > < strong > 0.90x</ strong > Germany ETF</ span >
99+ < span > < strong > 0.62x</ strong > UK ETF</ span >
100+ < span > < strong > 2.51x</ strong > US ETF</ span >
101+ </ div >
102+ < button class ="story-preset-button " type ="button " data-story-action ="market-gap ">
103+ Show ETF view
104+ </ button >
105+ </ article >
106+
107+ < article class ="story-step " data-story-preset ="scatter-gap ">
108+ < p class ="eyebrow "> Act 3 · Uneven gap</ p >
109+ < h2 > Prosperity and markets separate.</ h2 >
110+ < p >
111+ The scatter view fixes the comparison: GDP per capita growth on
112+ one axis, ETF growth on the other. Countries to the upper right
113+ turned prosperity into investable market returns; Europe is more
114+ mixed.
115+ </ p >
116+ < div class ="story-stat-row ">
117+ < span > < strong > Korea</ strong > high market response</ span >
118+ < span > < strong > Germany</ strong > GDP without ETF lift</ span >
119+ </ div >
120+ < button class ="story-preset-button " type ="button " data-story-action ="scatter-gap ">
121+ Show scatter view
122+ </ button >
123+ </ article >
124+
125+ < article class ="story-step " data-story-preset ="market-cap ">
126+ < p class ="eyebrow "> Act 4 · Market cap</ p >
127+ < h2 > Listed-company value compounds elsewhere.</ h2 >
128+ < p >
129+ Market capitalization makes the asymmetry harder to miss. The
130+ US compounds strongly, Korea is exceptional, and several major
131+ European markets trail despite real-economy growth.
132+ </ p >
133+ < div class ="story-stat-row ">
134+ < span > < strong > 11.49x</ strong > Korea market cap</ span >
135+ < span > < strong > 3.24x</ strong > US market cap</ span >
136+ < span > < strong > 1.14x</ strong > UK market cap</ span >
137+ </ div >
138+ < button class ="story-preset-button " type ="button " data-story-action ="market-cap ">
139+ Show market-cap view
140+ </ button >
141+ </ article >
142+
143+ < article class ="story-step " data-story-preset ="acwi-latest ">
144+ < p class ="eyebrow "> Act 5 · Global index</ p >
145+ < h2 > The index investors buy became more concentrated.</ h2 >
146+ < p >
147+ The ACWI snapshots translate the country story into portfolio
148+ exposure. From 2015 to 2026, US weight grows and technology
149+ becomes the dominant sector block.
150+ </ p >
151+ < div class ="story-stat-row ">
152+ < span > < strong > 63.7%</ strong > US ACWI weight</ span >
153+ < span > < strong > 30.7%</ strong > information technology</ span >
154+ </ div >
155+ < div class ="story-button-row ">
156+ < button class ="story-preset-button " type ="button " data-story-action ="acwi-first ">
157+ Show 2015 ACWI
158+ </ button >
159+ < button class ="story-preset-button " type ="button " data-story-action ="acwi-latest ">
160+ Show latest ACWI
161+ </ button >
162+ </ div >
163+ </ article >
164+
165+ < article class ="story-step story-step--explore " data-story-preset ="explore ">
166+ < p class ="eyebrow "> Explore yourself</ p >
167+ < h2 > Now test the thesis.</ h2 >
168+ < p >
169+ Use the controls to change the indicator, year, geography, and
170+ scale. The guided sections set the argument; the explorer lets
171+ you look for exceptions.
172+ </ p >
173+ < button class ="story-preset-button " type ="button " data-story-action ="explore ">
174+ Reset explorer
175+ </ button >
176+ </ article >
177+ </ div >
178+
179+ < section class ="map-panel story-stage " aria-label ="Interactive story stage ">
180+ < div class ="section-kicker section-kicker--panel ">
181+ < p class ="eyebrow "> Evidence explorer</ p >
182+ < h2 > Compare the growth story from four angles</ h2 >
183+ < p >
184+ Start with GDP to see that Europe is not standing still, then
185+ switch to ETF Price and Market Cap to see where the gap opens.
186+ Use countries for concrete examples, or regions for the broader pattern.
187+ </ p >
188+ </ div >
189+
31190 < div class ="control-bar ">
32191 < div class ="control-group control-group--inputs ">
33192 < label class ="control-field ">
74233 </ div >
75234
76235 < div id ="map-chart " class ="map-chart "> </ div >
236+ < p class ="chart-note ">
237+ Map mode shows where each indicator has grown since 2000. Scatter
238+ mode fixes the question to prosperity growth versus investable
239+ market growth, making outliers like the US, Korea, Germany, and the
240+ UK easier to compare.
241+ </ p >
77242
78243 < aside id ="spider-panel " class ="spider-overlay " aria-label ="Spider comparison " hidden >
79244 < div class ="spider-heading ">
@@ -91,15 +256,25 @@ <h2>Profile comparison</h2>
91256 < div >
92257 < p class ="eyebrow "> Evolution</ p >
93258 < h2 id ="evolution-title "> Indicator trajectory</ h2 >
259+ < p class ="panel-copy ">
260+ The line chart turns the selected year into a trajectory. Look
261+ for whether the gap appears gradually, after shocks, or only in
262+ the latest period.
263+ </ p >
94264 </ div >
95265 < div id ="evolution-chart " class ="chart "> </ div >
96266 </ section >
97267
98268 < section class ="treemap-panel " aria-label ="Country / sector treemap ">
99269 < div class ="treemap-panel__heading ">
100270 < div >
101- < p class ="eyebrow "> Market composition</ p >
102- < h2 id ="treemap-title "> ACWI weights by country and sector</ h2 >
271+ < p class ="eyebrow "> Final act</ p >
272+ < h2 id ="treemap-title "> Where global equity weight moved</ h2 >
273+ < p class ="panel-copy ">
274+ The ACWI snapshots show why the market gap matters: global
275+ equity exposure became more concentrated in the US and in
276+ technology-heavy sectors.
277+ </ p >
103278 </ div >
104279 < label class ="control-field control-field--treemap-time ">
105280 < span class ="control-label ">
@@ -112,7 +287,7 @@ <h2 id="treemap-title">ACWI weights by country and sector</h2>
112287 < section class ="treemap-card " aria-label ="Country treemap ">
113288 < div class ="treemap-card__heading ">
114289 < h3 > MSCI ACWI Countries</ h3 >
115- < p > Hover for sector breakdowns</ p >
290+ < p > Hover for sector breakdowns. Watch the US tile expand over time. </ p >
116291 </ div >
117292 < div id ="treemap-chart " class ="chart "> </ div >
118293 </ section >
@@ -124,14 +299,23 @@ <h3>MSCI ACWI sectors</h3>
124299 </ section >
125300 </ div >
126301 </ section >
302+ </ section >
127303 </ section >
128304 </ main >
129305
130306 < footer >
131307 < p >
132- Growth mode normalizes every country to its year-2000 baseline.
133- Absolute mode reveals economic scale where the underlying units are
134- comparable; ETF prices remain a normalized public-market proxy.
308+ Methodology: the main comparison covers 20 countries with comparable
309+ country ETF histories from 2000 to 2023. Growth mode normalizes each
310+ country to its year-2000 baseline. Absolute mode is shown only where
311+ units are comparable; ETF prices remain a normalized investable-market
312+ proxy.
313+ </ p >
314+ < p >
315+ Market capitalization comes from World Bank listed-company market cap
316+ data where reliable. Recent gaps are filled with the matching iShares
317+ MSCI country ETF price as a proxy; Russia, China, India, and Sweden
318+ are excluded from the market-cap comparison because of spotty data.
135319 </ p >
136320 </ footer >
137321 </ div >
0 commit comments