style: reduce AI writing patterns in all three blog posts

Author: shenxianpeng

docs/blog/posts/ai-native-commit-check.md

@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ authors:
 # AI-native: JSON output and a Python API
 
 More and more commits are written — or at least drafted — by AI agents and
-automation. So Commit Check is built to be *consumed* by machines, not only
-read by humans squinting at ASCII art in a terminal. This post covers the two
+automation. So Commit Check is also built for machines — not just humans reading
+terminal output. This post covers the two
 features that make that possible: machine-readable JSON output and an
 import-friendly Python API.
 
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ echo "feat: add streaming support" | commit-check -m --format json
 }
 ```
 
-The interesting case is failure. Each failing check carries the full `error`
+When a check fails, each result carries the full `error`
 and `suggest` fields an agent needs to **self-correct** — no scraping required:
 
 ```bash
@@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ echo "wip bad commit" | commit-check -m --format json
 }
 ```
 
-Feed that `suggest` string straight back to an LLM and it has everything it
-needs to rewrite the message and try again.
+Pass the `suggest` string back to an LLM, and it has what it needs to
+rewrite the message and retry.
 
 ## Quieter text, for humans
 
@@ -87,10 +87,10 @@ echo "wip bad commit" | commit-check -m --compact
 
 ## The Python API — no subprocess needed
 
-For tools and agents already running in Python, spawning a subprocess just to
-validate a string is wasteful. The `commit_check.api` module exposes a
-lightweight interface that returns plain dicts — easy to serialize, forward to
-an LLM, or chain into a larger workflow:
+For tools and agents running in Python, spawning a subprocess to validate
+a string adds unnecessary overhead. The `commit_check.api` module exposes
+functions that return plain dicts — easy to serialize, forward to an LLM,
+or chain into a larger workflow:
 
 ```python
 from commit_check.api import validate_message, validate_branch, validate_all
@@ -112,5 +112,5 @@ automated one — and gives that agent the precise feedback it needs to fix its
 own mistakes. One `cchk.toml`, enforced identically whether the author is a
 person, a CI job, or a model.
 
-Read the full AI-native guide in the
+Read more in the
 [README](https://github.com/commit-check/commit-check#ai-native-usage).

docs/blog/posts/configuring-commit-check.md

@@ -14,9 +14,8 @@ authors:
 # From zero-config to org-wide policy
 
 Commit Check works the moment you install it, but its real strength shows up
-when you start shaping the policy to fit your team. This post walks from the
-default behavior all the way to a configuration shared across an entire
-organization.
+when you start shaping the policy to fit your team. This post covers everything from the default behavior to organization-wide
+shared configuration.
 
 <!-- more -->
 
@@ -84,9 +83,9 @@ loosen a shared rule without forking the whole policy.
 
 ## Share one policy across many repos
 
-The feature that turns Commit Check from a per-repo tool into an
-organizational standard is `inherit_from`. Point each repository at a base
-config and override only what differs:
+`inherit_from` is the feature that makes Commit Check work across an
+organization. Point each repository at a base config and override only what
+differs:
 
 ```toml
 # .github/cchk.toml — inherit the org base, then adjust locally
@@ -123,15 +122,14 @@ repos:
         stages: [pre-push]
 ```
 
-One note worth repeating from the docs: piping `git push` into `commit-check`
-is **not** a prevention mechanism. By then the push has already started, and
-standard `git push` output doesn't carry the ref metadata the check relies on.
-Use the `pre-push` hook instead.
+A note: piping `git push` into `commit-check` is **not** a prevention
+mechanism — by then the push has already started. Use the `pre-push` hook
+instead.
 
-## The takeaway
+## Summary
 
 Start with zero config, add a `cchk.toml` when you want stricter rules, and
 reach for `inherit_from` when you want one standard across every repository.
-Same engine, same file format, growing with your team.
+Same engine, same file format, scaling with your team.
 
 Full reference: <https://commit-check.github.io/commit-check/configuration.html>

docs/blog/posts/introducing-commit-check.md

@@ -12,10 +12,9 @@ authors:
 
 # One policy file for your Git history
 
-Every team eventually writes the same wiki page: "How we write commit
-messages." It lists a commit convention, a branch naming scheme, a rule about
-signing off, and a plea to keep author emails consistent. Then nobody reads it,
-and the rules quietly rot.
+Most teams have a wiki page titled something like "How we write commit
+messages." It covers commit conventions, branch naming, sign-offs, and
+author email consistency — and then nobody reads it.
 
 **Commit Check** exists to turn that wiki page into something Git actually
 enforces.
@@ -33,9 +32,9 @@ commit that live around your code rather than inside it:
 - **Sign-off trailers** — `Signed-off-by` for DCO workflows
 - **Push safety** — catch accidental force-pushes before they rewrite history
 
-The important word is *policy*. Instead of scattering these rules across a CI
-script here, a pre-commit hook there, and a half-remembered convention
-everywhere, you write them **once** in a versioned `cchk.toml`.
+That word — *policy* — matters. Instead of scattering rules across a CI
+script, a pre-commit hook, and a stale convention doc, you write them
+**once** in a versioned `cchk.toml`.
 
 ## Write it once, enforce it everywhere
 
@@ -54,7 +53,7 @@ The same `cchk.toml` then drives:
 
 Because the policy is committed alongside your code, it is reviewed, diffed, and
 versioned like everything else. When the rules change, the change shows up in a
-pull request — not in a Slack message that scrolls away.
+pull request.
 
 ## Zero configuration to start
 
@@ -68,9 +67,9 @@ convention. That is enough to get value on day one.
 echo "feat: add streaming support" | commit-check -m
 ```
 
-When you are ready to tighten things up — a maximum subject length, required
-sign-off, an allow-list of commit types — you add a `cchk.toml` and grow into
-it. We will cover that in the next post.
+When you need stricter rules — a maximum subject length, required sign-off,
+or an allow-list of commit types — add a `cchk.toml`. The next post walks
+through the details.
 
 ## Add the badge