Changing signatures yourself #4661
tomasz-osadzinski
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Pardon me kind of new to anti-cheat thinking. If there's an existing book or documentation please direct me.
By replacing most primitive operators with say more complex math from the Math class, like low amplitude/randomized frequency sinusoidal waves, instead of just perfectly linear outputs, and do this for every feature, would it make the cheat unrecognizable enough that if properly injected VAC wouldn't detect it?
The more complex math the better.
Another example, instead of locking on to (0,0) of an enemy's head, too obvious, anywhere within the area of the circle? Randomize trigger frequency between 0.0ms and 0.27ms? Or even taking integrals of the enitre body's area etc.
Point is if the math is so overcomplicated that you hardly recognize what it's doing in the source code, VAC surely won't in the binary, right?
Maybe even add margin of error tolerance to overshoot and the aimbot would flick with certain humanlike speed, not completely linear. Exponential, as most Global Elite do anyway non-suspiciously?
Am i understanding this correctly?
Looking forward to true discussion. Thanks.
All reactions