fix: truncate rewritten training JSON - #1933
Conversation
Fixes #1909 Coding-Agent: Codex Codex-Version: codex-cli 0.149.0 Model: gpt-5.6-sol Reasoning-Effort: xhigh
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 49 minutes Limit details: You’ve used all 2 included reviews currently available. You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?Wait for the limit to reset, then comment An organization admin can change what happens after included review limits in Billing. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits within each organization. For paid Pro and Pro+ reviews, CodeRabbit uses a developer's included PR review attempts over the past 7 days to set the current hourly allowance. At typical activity levels, the full plan allowance applies. Higher sustained activity can lower the allowance until earlier attempts leave the 7-day window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1933 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 49.80% 49.80%
=======================================
Files 83 83
Lines 14986 14987 +1
=======================================
+ Hits 7464 7465 +1
Misses 7522 7522 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
njzjz-bot
left a comment
njzjz-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Independent review C
I found no blocking correctness, regression, security, or API issue in this change. CI/check evidence was considered alongside the full patch and relevant surrounding implementation. A formal APPROVE state cannot be submitted because the active njzjz-bot account is the PR author; GitHub self-review rules permit only a COMMENT review here.
Coding agent: Codex
Codex version: codex-cli 0.151.0
Model: gpt-5.6-sol
Reasoning effort: xhigh
njzjz-bot
left a comment
njzjz-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Independent review B
No blocking findings. I reviewed the full diff, relevant surrounding behavior, tests, and current check status. GitHub does not permit njzjz-bot to APPROVE or REQUEST_CHANGES on its own pull request, so this review is recorded as COMMENT only.
Coding agent: Codex
Codex version: codex-cli 0.151.0
Model: gpt-5.6-sol
Reasoning effort: xhigh
njzjz-bot
left a comment
njzjz-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Independent review B
No blocking findings. I reviewed the full diff, relevant surrounding behavior, tests, and current check status. GitHub does not permit njzjz-bot to APPROVE or REQUEST_CHANGES on its own pull request, so this review is recorded as COMMENT only.
Coding agent: Codex
Codex version: codex-cli 0.151.0
Model: gpt-5.6-sol
Reasoning effort: xhigh
njzjz-bot
left a comment
njzjz-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Independent review A
No blocking findings after reviewing the full diff, relevant surrounding implementation/tests, and the current check rollup. GitHub does not permit njzjz-bot to approve or request changes on its own PR, so this COMMENT review records the no-blocking-findings conclusion; no formal approval state is claimed.
Coding agent: Codex
Codex version: codex-cli 0.151.0
Model: gpt-5.6-sol
Reasoning effort: xhigh
1 participant
Summary
Tests
python -m unittest tests.test_util -vruff check dpgen/util.py tests/test_util.pyruff format --check dpgen/util.py tests/test_util.pyFixes #1909
Coding agent: Codex
Codex version: codex-cli 0.149.0
Model: gpt-5.6-sol
Reasoning effort: xhigh