Skip to content

Missing data validity check (backport #1269) - #1321

Open
mergify[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
2.14.xfrom
mergify/bp/2.14.x/pr-1269
Open

mergify[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
2.14.xfrom
mergify/bp/2.14.x/pr-1269

Conversation

@mergify

@mergify mergify Bot commented Sep 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description

This PR addresses the missing check for data validity before printing the received message. It was causing that the empty message receiving was being printed one extra time.

@Mergifyio backport 3.2.x 2.14.x

Contributor Checklist

  • Commit messages follow the project guidelines.
  • Code snippets related to the added documentation have been provided.
  • [N/A] Documentation tests pass locally.
  • The Pro version badge has been added if the documented feature is exclusive to Fast DDS Pro.
  • Applicable backports have been included in the description.

Reviewer Checklist

  • The PR has a milestone assigned.
  • The title and description correctly express the PR's purpose.
  • Check contributor checklist is correct.
  • CI passes without warnings or errors.

This is an automatic backport of pull request #1269 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

* Missing data validity check

Signed-off-by: zesk1999 <zesk1999@gmail.com>

* Review applied

Signed-off-by: zesk1999 <zesk1999@gmail.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: zesk1999 <zesk1999@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit b2af9ca)
@mergify mergify Bot mentioned this pull request Sep 16, 2026
8 tasks
@zesk1999
zesk1999 requested review from richiprosima and removed request for richiprosima September 17, 2026 09:43
@emiliocuestaf
emiliocuestaf self-requested a review September 18, 2026 06:48

@emiliocuestaf emiliocuestaf left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with green CI

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants