T3MP3ST is evidence-first: a finding should say whether it is backed by tool output, context, or only model reasoning.
If the evidence vault says Provenance: none or model-asserted, the finding is
not yet verified. Treat it as a hypothesis until a tool result, retest, or
operator-supplied artifact backs the claim.
A finding becomes tool-proven when all of these are true:
- The agent requests an Arsenal tool.
- T3MP3ST executes that tool through the harness.
- The returned output is captured as evidence.
- The finding records the tool name or evidence reference that supports it.
Final prose from a model is useful analysis, but it is not the same thing as tool-backed evidence.
For keyless runs, connect a local agent in the War Room Settings first: Claude Code, Codex, Hermes, or another supported local-agent backend.
The local agent must request tools through T3MP3ST. If it only writes a final answer in prose, the harness has no tool output to attach and findings should stay unverified/model-asserted.
For a quick sanity check:
- Start the War Room with
npm run server. - Connect a local agent in Settings.
- Use a local or explicitly authorized target.
- Run a harmless reconnaissance path.
- Open the evidence/finding view and check that at least one finding cites a tool name and captured output.
If every finding remains Provenance: none, the run may still be useful as a
planning pass, but it did not verify findings through the tool loop.
- No API provider or local agent is connected.
- The chosen agent produced prose instead of a tool request.
- The tool request could not be parsed by the local-agent/tool-call bridge.
- The tool was catalog-only, missing locally, or receipt-gated.
- The target or action was out of scope, so the harness correctly refused it.
- The final report promoted model analysis before a retest or evidence item was attached.
Before trusting a finding:
- Is there an evidence item?
- Does the evidence item include tool output, a command result, a screenshot, or another reproducible artifact?
- Does the finding cite the evidence or tool name?
- Did any receipt or scope gate apply?
- Has the claim been retested or falsified?
When in doubt, keep the finding labeled as unverified and queue a retest.