Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 7, 2026. It is now read-only.

Latest commit

 

History

History
49 lines (31 loc) · 1.7 KB

File metadata and controls

49 lines (31 loc) · 1.7 KB

Frame Dragging

Status: CANONICAL Paper: 24 — A Transformation-Based Definition of Local Lorentz Invariance and Its Connection to Frame Dragging


Frame Dragging in SSZ

Frame dragging (Lense-Thirring effect) in GR arises from the off-diagonal g_{tφ} metric components near rotating masses. SSZ does not modify the angular structure but affects the time component through Ξ.


SSZ Approach

For a rotating mass (Kerr-like geometry):

  • The angular momentum J creates an off-diagonal metric term
  • SSZ modifies the g_tt component: g_tt = -(1 - 2Ξ(r)) instead of -(1 - r_s/r)
  • The g_{tφ} cross-term is treated via standard PPN orbit machinery

Method Assignment

Frame dragging is a timelike orbit observable → uses PPN (β, γ), NOT Ξ-only.


Local Lorentz Invariance

SSZ maintains local Lorentz invariance by construction:

  • The speed of light c is locally invariant everywhere
  • Effects arise from geometry/path + clock mapping, not local speed changes
  • The transformation between frames preserves the local light cone structure

The transformation-based definition (Paper 24) shows that SSZ's modified time dilation is compatible with local Lorentz invariance because Ξ enters as a position-dependent scale, not a velocity-dependent one.


Observable Consequences

Observable Method SSZ vs GR
Lense-Thirring precession PPN Identical (weak field)
Geodetic precession PPN Identical (weak field)
Frame dragging near NS PPN + Ξ correction Different (strong field)

In the weak field (where frame dragging has been measured, e.g., Gravity Probe B), SSZ = GR exactly.


© 2025–2026 Carmen N. Wrede, Lino P. Casu