Repository navigation
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathCITATION.cff
More file actions
42 lines (42 loc) · 1.88 KB
/
Copy pathCITATION.cff
File metadata and controls
42 lines (42 loc) · 1.88 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
cff-version: 1.2.0
title: "TNFR-Python-Engine: Resonant Fractal Nature Theory Implementation"
message: "If you use this software, please cite it as below."
type: software
version: "0.0.3.9"
date-released: "2026-10-20"
authors:
- given-names: "F. F."
family-names: "Martinez Gamo"
orcid: "https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6116-0613"
repository-code: "https://github.com/fermga/TNFR-Python-Engine"
url: "https://github.com/fermga/TNFR-Python-Engine/releases/tag/v0.0.3.9"
# Project concept DOI (all versions); the URL above identifies this release.
doi: "10.5281/zenodo.17602860"
license: "MIT"
keywords:
- "TNFR"
- "Resonant Fractal Nature Theory"
- "complex systems"
- "network dynamics"
- "structural operators"
- "coherence theory"
- "physics simulation"
- "fractals"
- "resonance"
- "nodal equation"
- "phase synchronization"
abstract: >-
Python framework for investigating organized mathematical objects under
declared nodal laws. Objects retain the form, capacity, phase, support,
constituent information and context needed for their identity and response.
The engine integrates registered structural operators, grammar admission,
atomic execution stages, continuous and relational dynamics, and detached
observations and conditional certificates. Mathematical results address
formation, recovery, interaction, memory and collective actions under their
specific models. Identity, state sufficiency, supplied intervention and
autonomous occurrence remain distinct claims. Shared numerical admission,
report contracts and reproducible instruments support this investigation.
The basic primality utility remains separate; unsupported advanced arithmetic
integrations and the factorization lab are retired from active research.
Exact identities, conditional proofs and finite computational evidence do not
constitute empirical validation or select a unique fundamental law.