You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Commit 8015c6e
Browse filesBrowse the repository at this point in the historyBrowse files
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.4}Results on Levine\_32dim}{5}{subsection.3.4}\protected@file@percent }
38
38
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces ARI comparison on Levine\_32dim. Error bars show standard deviation over 3 runs. \texttt {densitree}{} achieves the highest ARI with the lowest variance.}}{6}{figure.caption.7}\protected@file@percent }
39
39
\newlabel{fig:benchmark}{{2}{6}{ARI comparison on Levine\_32dim. Error bars show standard deviation over 3 runs. \densitree {} achieves the highest ARI with the lowest variance}{figure.caption.7}{}}
40
+
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.4}Results on Levine\_32dim}{6}{subsection.3.4}\protected@file@percent }
40
41
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.5}Results on synthetic data}{6}{subsection.3.5}\protected@file@percent }
41
-
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.6}Ablation: contribution of each component}{6}{subsection.3.6}\protected@file@percent }
42
+
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.6}Results on Levine\_13dim}{6}{subsection.3.6}\protected@file@percent }
42
43
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Benchmark results on synthetic data (50{,}000 cells, 15 features, 12 populations). Bold indicates best.}}{7}{table.caption.8}\protected@file@percent }
43
44
\newlabel{tab:synthetic}{{2}{7}{Benchmark results on synthetic data (50{,}000 cells, 15 features, 12 populations). Bold indicates best}{table.caption.8}{}}
44
-
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Ablation study on Levine\_32dim. Each row adds one component cumulatively. MBK = MiniBatchKMeans.}}{7}{table.caption.9}\protected@file@percent }
45
-
\newlabel{tab:ablation}{{3}{7}{Ablation study on Levine\_32dim. Each row adds one component cumulatively. MBK = MiniBatchKMeans}{table.caption.9}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}Decoupling as a general principle}{7}{subsection.4.2}\protected@file@percent }
50
-
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespacesAblation study on Levine\_32dim. Each bar adds one component cumulatively. Error bars show ARI standard deviation. The mixed-linkage consensus eliminates the high variance introduced by decoupled clustering while further improving accuracy.}}{8}{figure.caption.10}\protected@file@percent}
51
-
\newlabel{fig:ablation}{{3}{8}{Ablation study on Levine\_32dim. Each bar adds one component cumulatively. Error bars show ARI standard deviation. The mixed-linkage consensus eliminates the high variance introduced by decoupled clustering while further improving accuracy}{figure.caption.10}{}}
51
+
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Ablation study on Levine\_32dim. Each row adds one component cumulatively. MBK = MiniBatchKMeans.}}{8}{table.caption.10}\protected@file@percent }
52
+
\newlabel{tab:ablation}{{4}{8}{Ablation study on Levine\_32dim. Each row adds one component cumulatively. MBK = MiniBatchKMeans}{table.caption.10}{}}
53
+
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}Decoupling as a general principle}{8}{subsection.4.2}\protected@file@percent}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Ablation study on Levine\_32dim. Each bar adds one component cumulatively. Error bars show ARI standard deviation. The mixed-linkage consensus eliminates the high variance introduced by decoupled clustering while further improving accuracy.}}{9}{figure.caption.11}\protected@file@percent }
61
+
\newlabel{fig:ablation}{{3}{9}{Ablation study on Levine\_32dim. Each bar adds one component cumulatively. Error bars show ARI standard deviation. The mixed-linkage consensus eliminates the high variance introduced by decoupled clustering while further improving accuracy}{figure.caption.11}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Distribution of ARI over 20 independent runs on Levine\_32dim. \texttt {densitree}{} (left) achieves consistently high ARI with minimal variance, while FlowSOM-style (right) exhibits a bimodal distribution with frequent low-quality runs. Dashed lines indicate mean ARI.}}{9}{figure.caption.11}\protected@file@percent }
62
-
\newlabel{fig:stability}{{4}{9}{Distribution of ARI over 20 independent runs on Levine\_32dim. \densitree {} (left) achieves consistently high ARI with minimal variance, while FlowSOM-style (right) exhibits a bimodal distribution with frequent low-quality runs. Dashed lines indicate mean ARI}{figure.caption.11}{}}
\bibcite{weber2016comparison}{Weber and Robinson(2016)}
70
72
\bibcite{wilkerson2010consensus}{Wilkerson and Hayes(2010)}
71
-
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Example \texttt {densitree}{} tree output on Levine\_32dim with 20 clusters. Left: nodes colored by median CD45 expression (viridis colormap). Right: nodes sized proportionally to cell count. The tree captures the phenotypic hierarchy of the bone marrow compartment.}}{10}{figure.caption.15}\protected@file@percent }
72
-
\newlabel{fig:tree}{{5}{10}{Example \densitree {} tree output on Levine\_32dim with 20 clusters. Left: nodes colored by median CD45 expression (viridis colormap). Right: nodes sized proportionally to cell count. The tree captures the phenotypic hierarchy of the bone marrow compartment}{figure.caption.15}{}}
73
-
\gdef\@abspage@last{10}
73
+
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Distribution of ARI over 20 independent runs on Levine\_32dim. \texttt {densitree}{} (left) achieves consistently high ARI with minimal variance, while FlowSOM-style (right) exhibits a bimodal distribution with frequent low-quality runs. Dashed lines indicate mean ARI.}}{10}{figure.caption.12}\protected@file@percent }
74
+
\newlabel{fig:stability}{{4}{10}{Distribution of ARI over 20 independent runs on Levine\_32dim. \densitree {} (left) achieves consistently high ARI with minimal variance, while FlowSOM-style (right) exhibits a bimodal distribution with frequent low-quality runs. Dashed lines indicate mean ARI}{figure.caption.12}{}}
75
+
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Example \texttt {densitree}{} tree output on Levine\_32dim with 20 clusters. Left: nodes colored by median CD45 expression (viridis colormap). Right: nodes sized proportionally to cell count. The tree captures the phenotypic hierarchy of the bone marrow compartment.}}{11}{figure.caption.16}\protected@file@percent }
76
+
\newlabel{fig:tree}{{5}{11}{Example \densitree {} tree output on Levine\_32dim with 20 clusters. Left: nodes colored by median CD45 expression (viridis colormap). Right: nodes sized proportionally to cell count. The tree captures the phenotypic hierarchy of the bone marrow compartment}{figure.caption.16}{}}
0 commit comments